Commons:Administrators/Requests/CptViraj

 Support = 30;  Oppose = 0;  Neutral = 0 – 100%. Result: successful. odder (talk) 09:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

CptViraj (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 17:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi.

I'm CptViraj, I'm a native speaker of Gujarati, near-native of Hindi, intermediate of English and I have basic understanding of Fiji Hindi, Sanskrit, Marathi, Bhojpuri, Haryanvi, Nepali.

I started contributing in May 2019, I'm a license reviewer and filemover. I usually tag obvious copyvios, broken redirects, inappropriate userpages, out of scope files for (speedy) deletion. I'm fimilar with all of general guidelines/policies and copyright policies of India. On the license reviewing side I review and interesting in reviewing Bollywood Hungama and easy GODL-India files only, but I have basic knowledge of YT and Flickr files too. I have learnt from my this mistake.

If promoted, I will help at COM:DR, COM:RFR, CAT:CV, CAT:PER, COM:AN, COM:LRR, CAT:MWUDIOV, etc maintenance tasks. I won't use my rights whenever i'm in doubt and will ask for advice.

Please feel free to ask questions, Thankyou! -- CptViraj (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Deserves a chance. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Yes absolutely . Thank you for volunteering. --- FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Hopefully you'll be dealing with spambots as well. 1989_talk 19:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Natuur12 (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Awesome editor. Would be a great support for the community. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 00:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Deserving candidate. Best wishes --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 03:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, yes please. Competent enough. I feel he will do great with the admin tools, and hopefully admin backlog will be cleared so glad to support. Keep up the good works! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 03:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ahmad^talk 04:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, of course!   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Herby ^{talk thyme} 06:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 07:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -FASTILY 09:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support. —Hasley 20:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I do have some suggestions, for example to be a little more explicit. For an admin it is sometimes good to just say "per above" or "because of what another person said", but in general it is best to restate things even when the appear to be obious. When a new user first comes across a person in position of power on Commons it should be a learning experience, not an attempt to guess what gods want at this particular time. But I find it a good sign that see the mistake that was done and to act to rectify it. I look forward to seeing CptViraj as an admin on our project and hope they will prove me correct. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for volunteering and please stay safe. T Cells^Talk 18:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Jianhui67 ^T★C 03:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Yes for me. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support. Knowledge is not perfect, but seems levelheaded and conscientious to me, knows what he knows and what he doesn't know. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Why not, let's try it. --Rosenzweig τ 17:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Yeah! ミラP 22:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support We need good helpers! Thank you for volunteering for the mop & bucket. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support iMahesh (talk) 10:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, but correct answer to file:Fontainebleau, France - Synagogue (16867666306).jpg question would be "There is no freedom of panorama in France, but the synagogue was built in 1861 and the copyright is expired." Taivo (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I think CptViraj does a good job and is not afraid to ask if in doubt so I support. --MGA73 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Support this user for admin Encik Tekateki (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Mosbatho (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Late vote. odder (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Would you please give your opinion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bloom's Taxonomy for Course Design and Teaching.pdf. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Gone Postal: Thank you for commenting, I did give my opinion on the discussion page. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I have answered on that discussion page, could you please consider it and give your response. Thank you. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi, I just wanted to let you know that you will probably get the nomination even without my vote, but I wasn't trolling when I have asked for a response, I honestly was trying to make up my mind. You don't have to respond on the deletion request, if you think that it's better to respond here (or even on my talk page), but I would appreciate it if you do. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Ah apologize, somehow I didn't noticed your above comment. I'll continue on the DR page. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Another question. When do you think that speedy deletion without a deletion discussion should be allowed? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  When the reason is uncontroversial and meets our speedy deletion criteria. And for F1 and F10, I personally believe that old files should go through DR process. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question How would you respond if File:John_Muir_Trail_-_Yosemite_National_Park,_California,_USA_(27672489992).jpg was nominated for speedy deletion with the rationale: "derivative"? What would you take into consideration? --07:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

  @99of9: Thankyou for your question, here is my answer:

  As an admin: It is my own upload, so I won't make any actions. And if it wasn't my own upload, I will still leave it for another admin as I don't think it is a obvious copyvio, and currently I'm interested in performing actions for easy and obvious pages only.

  As a user/uploader: This image was part of a mass-upload I did from flickr, back then I wasn't that much fimilar with Commons copyright policies. I see that the drawing in the board could be copyrighted unless it is {{PD-old}}. I will try to find the history behind that drawing and if I failed, I will leave this to the admin. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question How would you respond if File:Fontainebleau, France - Synagogue (16867666306).jpg was nominated for speedy deletion with the rationale: "derivative"? What would you take into consideration? --07:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

  @99of9: Thankyou for your question, here is my answer:

  As an admin: It is my own upload, so I won't make any actions. And if it wasn't my own upload, I will decline the speedy deletion request and will move it to DR as this is a FOP case, so F4 doesn't apply.

  As a user/uploader: This image was part of a mass-upload I did from flickr, back then I wasn't that much fimilar with Commons copyright policies. I don't see any non-free content in the image and I'm not fimilar with COM:FOP France so I will leave this to other users. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question A photograph was taken in India in 1945, and the photographer died in 1980. Is the image acceptable for Commons, and why? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @King of Hearts: Thankyou for your question. It would be in the public domain in India per {{PD-India}} and {{PD-India-photo-1958}}, But any work originating in India must be in the public domain, or available under a free license, in both India and the United States before it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. And for US I'm fimilar with TOO rules only, but I roughly read the PD rules after your question and I think the photograph would need to meet all the three requirements mentioned in {{PD-1996}}. For the note: As I said in my nomination "Currently I review and interested in reviewing Bollywood Hungama and easy GODL-India files only". Sorry! -- CptViraj (talk) 03:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question A user uploads a painting claimed to be from 1750 but provides no source information, so another user comes along and tags it with {{No source since}}. You are patrolling the log and come across this image. How would you handle this situation? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @King of Hearts: Thankyou for your question. I will try to find the artist and the museum. If succed, I will use {{Artwork}} and for source it would be museum's institution template, for license it would be {{PD-old-100}} in {{PD-Art}}. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]