Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Malinaccier (talk | contribs) →Amendment 1: Comment |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2:
= {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment|Requests for amendment|[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment|Requests for amendment]]}} =
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment/Header}}
==Request to amend prior case: EEML (2)==
'''Initiated by ''' <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|403]]''</sup> 06:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Line 123 ⟶ 199:
==== Comment by Martintg ====
??? I don't recall Varsovian ever being discussed on the EEML, unless he is a sock of someone we did discuss. I do note that he only joined on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Varsovian September 28, 2009], ''after'' the EEML case was opened. BTW, I did a quick check (I'm on vacation so I didn't really spend too much time on this) in the Baltic topic space and there are also quite a few unreferenced BLPs. If the Committee are of a mind to amend the remedy, perhaps it could be made more generic to cover the other sub-topic areas within EE.--[[User:Martintg|Martin]] ([[User talk:Martintg|talk]]) 12:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
===Amendment 2===
| |||