Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

::::I agree. I don't think this organization has any standing here, and the situation you've been put in is unfair. However, a block at this precise moment is likely to generate drama/noise (appeals, admin action review, wheel warring) without addressing the underlying issues. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 17:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

::::This is disgraceful, Arbcom. You’ve made an exception to a hard and fast rule so someone can post a cherry picked attack, using user rights that are normally granted and revoked through [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions|community processes]]. After basically using this exception to attack an editor, you’ve had a line of admins (count me among them) that would be happy to issue a NOTHERE block, but are using your soft powers to prevent that. You have chosen to bend over backwards in the name of transparency for this noneditor that you are subjecting editors (complaint #1?) to abuse. For absolute shame, Arbcom. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

::::I'm going to have to object there. This is a much more Pinter-esque scenario. A true ''Waiting for Godot'' moment. [[User:Iskandar323|Iskandar323]] ([[User talk:Iskandar323|talk]]) 17:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)