Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

:I am merely asking, both on the OP's talk page and here, to '''discuss and gain consensus''' first, nor am I seeking to remvoe the content (while keeping the disputed sources hidden). Why the ego to have it up as one wants and not attempt to discuss as ive requested? In fact the point of a fact tag IS to improve on sources, or at the very least have a second source.[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 06:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

::{{ping|Someguy1221}} How is "my version" to stand the issue? If it was "my version" I would keep the content out, and upon that revert, even the source. On the contrary, I have kept the content ''and'' even the source n the editing box as an accomodation. (the latter being hidden from readership in the '''interim'''). I have also praised the editor of the civil discussion for his valuable additions. Is that problematic? Who is being "problamtic" w/ NPAs (both in summary and this section title (after notifying him on his talk page and he replied that h e would come here instead of discussing, or even for tht matter apologizing)) and spurning ''requests'' for discussion to ''resolve'' the issue amicably? Did I sulk when the AFd was closed?[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 06:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)