User talk:Kirill Lokshin: Difference between revisions

User:Kirill Lokshin/A

Thanks for fixing that up for me. What do you think so far? Mrprada911 (talk) 03:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you made an edit to the incident listed in the Administrators notice board, it is requested that you confirm the details of the incident here (section 1.1.2)

This is as the incident is used as the basis of an argument and needs to be confirm by persons familar with the event

Regards --User:Mitrebox talk 2008-02-22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.11.244.78 (talk) 07:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirill, I am still working on catching up the Native American military history articles. In that vein, I just posted an article which I think is military history, but on which I would like another, wiser opinion. In 1871, the Army, tired of Indian raids, (drat those pesky indians who would just not accept the theft of their land and go quietly to the reservation!), had three Kiowa chiefs arrested and tried in a Texas state court for murder, for the Warren Wagon Train Raid. This became an international cause celebre. Wikipedia did not have an article on this interesting event, so I wrote one, and just posted it. To me, since it was an integral part of the Indian Wars, it is clearly a part of Military History. Am I right? Thanks for always listening, I don't know we are all going to do when you are gone from the project!  :( JohninMaryland (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you put up WP1.0, but I'll be darn if I can find anywhere in their pages what their divisions/categories are. I know you gave it to me once before, but I can't find it. I'll follow your page. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find divisions at Wikipedia:Version 0.5 but don't find anything similar for 1.0 SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The index page itself is what I was referring to; the statistics for each project will indicate the number of FAs for the area in question. Kirill 03:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. I thought you were referring to the organizational scheme at 0.5, which someone suggested once. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kirill, sorry to bother you but I was wondering if you had the time could you please have a look at the Cleomenean War and tell me what you think needs to be improved before I can begin it's push for FAC. Thanks. Kyriakos (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kirill. Its going to seem real wierd to not have you at the helm of this particular battleship though, but all good things must come to an end I suppose. Take care, and good luck :) TomStar81 (Talk) 00:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind message and for all the help you have given me in the past. I look forward with keen pleasure to further collaboration with you in the future :) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 00:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the order of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of your outstanding organizational work, your painstaking maintenance work, and your unstinting advice. For the coordinators, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 01:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]