Jump to content

User talk:Tehonk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
i wanted to cancel pending one
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 5: Line 5:


{{unblock|reason=I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. [[User:Tehonk|Tehonk]] ([[User talk:Tehonk#top|talk]]) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|reason=I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. [[User:Tehonk|Tehonk]] ([[User talk:Tehonk#top|talk]]) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)}}
*Per [[WP:BLANKING]], you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests. If you do so again, I will revoke your access to this page.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 02:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:31, 18 August 2021

August 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tehonk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What about 8 reverts? 4 in 24 hours + another 5 in 24 hours (now 6). What about referenced materials he removed from not just mine but different users with these blind reverts? Including box office magazine from another user and release details I added with refs? I'm the one who makes use of most of the talk page, he's going on without getting his consensus and while discussion was still continuing. If you unblock me I needed to participate in dispute resolution thread. It's not fair when I can't voice my side there. I did not report him when he breached 4 reverts (mine was only 3) out of good faith, and now you only block me because I was trying to use talk page Tehonk (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tehonk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. Tehonk (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. [[User:Tehonk|Tehonk]] ([[User talk:Tehonk#top|talk]]) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. [[User:Tehonk|Tehonk]] ([[User talk:Tehonk#top|talk]]) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was using talk page all the time and I was not disruptive, I was trying to prevent what was disruptive. This is not fair when I'm unable to participate on discussions like dispute resolution, because then he uses this to deceive and say I refuse to participate. [[User:Tehonk|Tehonk]] ([[User talk:Tehonk#top|talk]]) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}