User talk:ElectricEye: Difference between revisions

Thanks for the welcome!Sirberus 01:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See here. -- Lonewolf BC 01:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am currently having a problem with a Vandal I believe to be RevolverOcelotX. He deleted my attempts at a check user on a Apocalyptic Destroyer. If you check my page you will see that another user has been active there and my IP adress page has even been vandalised. I rarely edit, but wanted the it to be known about this puppeteer.ShuckyDucky 03:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence of policy violation here, so there no rationale for a checkuser. This is a retaliatory request by ShuckyDucky for his content dispute in the Bruce Lee article. ShuckyDucky made improper report here which should be deleted. Guardian Tiger

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 23:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry this is being brought up on your page...but I have no prior dealings with Guardian Tiger before tonight. It is rather curious that he is following me around to every page I have edited. Why was the my report deleted? The admins can dismiss the report if it is wrong? Thank You.ShuckyDucky 04:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming talk pages with the same message and adhere to Wikipedia's policies. What you did is considered vandalism in Wikipedia. I suggest that you gain consensus on the talk page before making drastic changes to other editor's works. Guardian Tiger

Thank you for such a warm welcome to wikipedia, I hope to stay for a few months a be a great help. Rasillon 11:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added some stuff I thought would be notable, but I am writing about myself, and I can't really get references. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ronnie davis (talk • contribs) 11:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Replied[1][2] to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 11:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Happy New Year! I just saw your article on Mr. Blumenfeld and would like you to expand on it. For example, I did have a Chemistry teacher by that name 25 or so years ago in a NYC suburb - could this be him or someone else? What subject did he teach? where did he teach? Anything along those lines would be appreciated. And in the future, please categorize!  :) Cathy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.162.30.96 (talk) 13:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided I wish to join the Welcome Committie. How do I do it? and is there any advice you can give me? Rasillon 18:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interesting contribution about Japan's justice system. IMHO, however, this does not belong in a separate article. I've begun a discussion on the article's talk page, and I look forward to your input. Thank you. LordAmeth 11:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't erase "She has been taking courses with the Church of Scientology since 2004" Johnpedia 21:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 07:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not attacking the user clown, I just think we don't need that page anymore. The user hasn't edited for a while now, and the comment "All I know that he is a bad motherfucker" is patent nonsense.--Rasillon 15:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 04:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message[3]. The account is a clear sockpuppet, created in an attempt to antagonize me, see its contributions- Deathrocker 14:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 14:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What items specifically are unreferenced? - CobaltBlueTony 15:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electric Eye, I do not know anything about sockpuppets nor do I know user Deathrocker other than the accusing note to me in response to my musing over the user's claim of being a musical guru, which I found interesting. Upon investigation I can see that this user has tangled with others all over wikipedia. Musical Guru 16:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer for assistance. Is all the work I did this morning lost altogether? I'm very new to this, so I'm not sure where to watch for a reply to this except on my own talk page. Please forgive the newbie! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IGuy (talk • contribs) 18:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were also deleted nonsense articles which don't show up in the user's contribs. This user knew exactly what they were doing and they were surprised to have been stopped so soon, thinking they had more timewasting rope available to them than they actually had. I'd be 103% sure they will reappear as a different, and equally vandalism-inclined, user in the near future. Hope this helps. ⇨REDVEЯS 19:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to help clean up this page, but need some advice. Most of the information written about YGS is from his autobiography entitled "Wings to Freedom". Since this is autobiographical, I'm not sure if any of it is encyclopedic. Other information about him is on his website, which again is perhaps unencyclopedic. The only 3rd party sources I've found are several magazine articles. There are also audio interviews with him on radio stations. What of these sources can be used to build a credible article? Thanks. Hamsacharya dan 08:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support at Template talk:Warn. Are you aware that there is a project for renewing user warnings? I have just been invited to it today, and they set themselves a deadline of Jan 21, which is really short for the gigantic task at hand. In my view, there isn't even agreement about the basic definitions yet. — Sebastian 01:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the material at User:Haluskein is a textbook {{db-band}} speedy deletion, why did you:

a) move it into user space?

b) cut and paste it, thereby breaking GFDL?

--Calton | Talk 07:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Electric Eye. I have been having a bit of a struggle lately with one article which has been a the receiving end of what I am experiencing as rather unhelpful and repetitive comments which seem to me to depart from the iterative dialogue by which Wikipedia contributors refine any particular Wikipedia entry. e.g. Instead of correcting a specific error or modifying a particular conclusion the article is constantly labelled as not meeting certain Wikipedia standards. I stand ready to be corrected (I hope) but I would appreciate your help and opinion on the 'History' of the entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Patch_Park Every time I reopen this article there is a message possibly automatically generated saying, for instance: This article or section reads like a personal reflection or essay and may require cleanup. Please help improve this article by rewriting this article or section in an encyclopedic style. (help, talk).This article includes a list of works cited but its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations. You can help Wikipedia by introducing more precise citations. How can I deal with what seems to me like a constant reproach. Sometimes it is difficult to locate precise citations. I did remove one that I agree was imprecise because it referred to Birmingham Central Library where I had been given assistance in starting my research on the Black Patch article. Could the person who is generating what feels to me like a rather intrusive and judgmental message not try to help by finding references themselves or should I just remove the whole article? That's ridiculous I realise, especially as I am no longer it's only author but I am in a quandary as to what to do to get this article made acceptable to Wikipedia - especially as I have never minded asking for editorial and formating assistance in the case of the many other articles I have contributed either by starting them from scratch or by adding to a stub. I think that what is happening in the case of Black Patch Park is that a self-appointed collective of regional editors have decided to apply their own 'worthy' criteria to 'raising the standard' as they see it of all articles on Wikipedia that deal with the West Midlands under the heading West Midlands WikiProject http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WestMids I am finding myself in a dilemma. I am also for the way truth can be arrived at through debate and collective editing but I am feeling that in this instance there is an imbalance between creative contributions to understanding and the editing of that contribution. Can you please look at the Black Patch park article and have a go at giving it a make-over so that it passes muster? Sincerely Simon Baddeley 09:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 14:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Since you are an ex member of the now dead wikiproject Esperanza, which I tried to re-establish. (But failed). You may be pleased to know I' am trying to create this [4] Alphawiki, which is a completely improved, new version of Esperanza. If you are intrested let me know. Eaomatrix 15:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A RfC has been started regarding the use of sources as "exceptional claims" on the above article. As an previously interested party, your input would be most valued. Comment Talk:Nick_Baker_(prisoner_in_Japan)#Request_for_comments. Thank you. Sparkzilla 06:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talk page. --ElectricEye (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Jimbo Wales...)

Do not waste your time writing a message to me.

I am no longer in support of Wikipedia and have joined the ranks of those who oppose it.

Then join new ranks. Several ex-wikipedians have made the leap [5]

Disclaimer: If you think I'm spamming you then please write on my talk age and I will never bother you again

--ElectricEye (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]