User talk:Skäpperöd: Difference between revisions
→Hi: new section |
→AE request involving you: new section |
||
Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
I've filed a request for mediation here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-09-12/Treaties_of_Bautzen_and_Merseburg].[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz|talk]]) 21:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
I've filed a request for mediation here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-09-12/Treaties_of_Bautzen_and_Merseburg].[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz|talk]]) 21:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== AE request involving you == |
|||
I mention you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Discussion_concerning_Varsovian here]. [[User:Varsovian|Varsovian]] ([[User talk:Varsovian|talk]]) 14:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:24, 15 September 2010
Contents |
---|
DYK for Lutici
![]() | On May 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lutici, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Oñate treaty
![]() | On June 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oñate treaty, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello
Okay. B-Machine (talk) 17:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
Thanks for the quick instructions on how to edit Kruszwica's history section. I was reading that section and immediately recognized it as coming from Lewinski-Corwin's book, because I had literally started reading the book earlier in the day. I felt compelled to create a user account for the sole purpose inquiring on how to give credit to this book, but now that I have it will probably try to contribute here and there where I can.
I saw on your account profile you are from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, and was pleased to see someone is working towards expanding English based pages detailing the region and it's history.
Thanks again.
--MeckPomm (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png/130px-Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Treaty of Constantinople (1700)
![]() | On June 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Constantinople (1700), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Treaty of Kiel
![]() | On June 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Kiel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Treaties of Cölln and Mewe
![]() | On July 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaties of Cölln and Mewe, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Neutral notification
As somebody who took part in the previous move discussion, you may be interested in the current move discussion here. Varsovian (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello Skäpperöd. Somebody suggested that 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames might be a good candidate for WP:DYK, but it's a little short at 1200 characters. Do you think you could expand the article a little bit to bring it to 1500 characters? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- I added a short section on parallel renaming in Silesia. Perhaps the scope and title of the article is better changed to be more general than just East Prussia. BTW, the source I added also has information on the subsequent renaming by Polish authorities after the war which could be useful in the parallel article.radek (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Radeksz. It's long enough for DYK now. I suppose you should raise the question of scope and title on the article's Talk page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I've nominated 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Lancken-Granitz dolmens
![]() | On July 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lancken-Granitz dolmens, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames
![]() | On July 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
good to know
that Wikipedia already had an article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chy%C5%BCans&diff=next&oldid=374239532. However, when redirecting, can you please remember to carry over inter'wiki links and the like. Radek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radeksz (talk • contribs)
Peace at fifty?
![]() |
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
Well I look back at your previous DYK entries and notice a fine balance between biographies, wars and treaties. I haven't added them up myself but I'm hoping there are more treaties than wars. On the other hand if there are more wars than treaties then ... could you fix the balance of the scores before you get to 100? More seriously - thanks from me and the wiki. Fifty is a real achievement. Well done. Victuallers (talk) 13:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much - I think I wrote many more articles about treaties, but I haven't counted either. Much appreciated Skäpperöd (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Archaeologists discover Britain's 'oldest house
This story was posted to the BBC News Website, you may find it of interest
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-10929343
--Woogie10w (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Your harassment
![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Yes_check.svg/20px-Yes_check.svg.png)
I leave the project. Too much harassment and stalking. I did like to do disambiguation work, fixing lots of wrong incoming links to ambiguous article titles etc. Hope the stalkers can have a nice party now. ADIOS! Schwyz (talk) 10:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello again? I do not oppose you coming back and do uncontroversial dab work, but not like that. Skäpperöd (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
A good day
My compliments for keeping your nerve in a big moving thing today. Good editor. Here is my Written Barnstar. -DePiep (talk) 01:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! I appreciated your comments, too. Skäpperöd (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Veste Landskron
![]() | On 18 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Veste Landskron, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Courcelles 18:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
You can set the record straight. Go for it.
Skapperod you are there, what can you tell us about this surge of Neo-Nazi activity in your backyard?
NDR online is interesting, the world has gotten a lot smaller with the internet
BTW I am giving you an opening to point out that most people in Germany today condemn the Neo-Nazis. Too many people in here in the US believe that the Germans are still Nazis. You can set the record straight. Go for it.--Woogie10w (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wonder what record am I supposed to set straight??? You were asking about the "surge", and I am glad you moved the comment here because the article talk page is not suitable for that kind of conversation. First, it is not a surge, rather a small, but persistent annoyance. The neo Nazis here are a small, heterogeneous group. Part of them are violent, loud and seemingly disorganized (small local groups not subordinate to any larger association). The degree to which they actually are neo Nazis varies considerably, some are just using Nazi symbols to some extend but are not really involved with the ideology. Others are members of local NPD groups, who atm are trying to avoid violent acts of their members (with limited success) to present a more right-wing-populist and less Nazi-like image. Others are organized in small splinter parties who periodically get banned and altogether are insignificant and unknown. Politicians and NGOs of all coleurs have been trying to ban the NPD for years now, but the Verfassungsschutz had inadvertedly torpedoed the last ban initiative by infiltrating the NPD to such a degree that the case failed when brought before the supreme court (and only the court has the power to ban parties). The occasional rallies of the far right largely do not consist of local neo Nazis, but of participants who travel there from other parts of the state, and even that way they do not achieve significant levels of particpation. These people are usually escorted by the police from the trains or busses they arrive with, the police then herds them through the prepared route which is usually far away from main roads, take anyone into custody who shows any kind of illegal behavior (pretty much everything to do with Nazism is illegal in Germany), and then escorts them back to the train/bus station and disperse the group. The police is really doing a good job on this. That way, such rallies are barely noted and their impact is about zero. Maybe you understand better now why I do not want that these rallies get an attention here that's being successfully denied to them in RL. Skäpperöd (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- RL?--Woogie10w (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- real life, the wonderful universe outside of the virtual dungeons of wikipedia. Skäpperöd (talk) 17:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- RL?--Woogie10w (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- As Columbo would say Just one more thing Why do you spend so much time in the virtual dungeons of wikipedia? [5]--Woogie10w (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Lost a ring. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think a guy named Bilbo now has it.radek (talk) 08:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Lost a ring. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- As Columbo would say Just one more thing Why do you spend so much time in the virtual dungeons of wikipedia? [5]--Woogie10w (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Mass suicide in Demmin
![]() | On 3 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mass suicide in Demmin, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Skäpperöd, Thanks for your message. It's nice that we were both correct and incorrect. Best wishes, Ericoides (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Demmin 1945
Thank you for taking the time to explain the background of the current events in MVP. I now have a better understanding of the political situation there and how it relates to Germany’s tragic past. One observation that I would like to make regarding the You-Tube clips of the marches in Demmin, in my opinion the young people in those public demonstrations may be the target of police surveillance. Based on my knowledge of Germany it could also have a negative impact on their careers.
Thank you again for taking time to answer my postings, wishing you all the best. Regards --Woogie10w (talk) 00:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome. The young people are probably not target of surveillance, the ones with the ties - most definetely. Skäpperöd (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
I have no doubt that they are on Wikipedia also, anybody can edit.
Überwachungsstaat Deutschland [6]
Innenminister Lorenz Caffier setzt Initiative “Wehrhafte Demokratie” fort![7]
--Woogie10w (talk) 18:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Radical ties could also have a negative impact on the careers of young people
[8] --[9]
Woogie10w (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- I am not sure I understand what you want to tell me with that - I am aware of the above, but what is the subject you want to talk about? Their impact on wikipedia? From my experience, that is about zero. Skäpperöd (talk) 15:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- My point is that the article may attract police attention because the issue of May 8th 1945 is a hot potato in MVP (auf deutsch ein heisses Eisen). In my opinion it would be best to point out the NPD exploitation of the issue and the current efforts of the MVP government to combat Neo-Nazi activity in Demmin. --Woogie10w (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- You wrote Their impact on wikipedia? From my experience, that is about zero Nobody saw the Stasi, but you knew they were there.--Woogie10w (talk) 19:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Meine Meinung war nicht von ungefahr [10]
Deutsch Humor ist die beste [11]
--Woogie10w (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Of course the police are patrolling the web, it would be a shame if they wouldn't. I also like the haGalil approach though, they are doing a good job.
- Re "Deutsch Humor ist die beste" - arguably, not. Skäpperöd (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- I do not know what is going on upstairs. I just play the piano downstairs. [12]--Woogie10w (talk) 14:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
![]() | On 9 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Steinbach
Hi, I just made an edit at Erika Steinbach. You may want to contribute there since you have access to the German media reports on her resignation. Regards--Woogie10w (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Sounds ok. The chapter covers the time when Cossack Hetmanate was allowed to conduct an independent foreign policy trying to secure its brittle sovereignty, while being involved in what could have been an early partition of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Apparently there was a split in the Polish society at that time with possibly Poland becoming a protestant state. Russia sided with Poland, while it was contradicting the recent treaties with Zaporizhia. The single page that I mentioned is the first of that chapter which covers about three pages. A sort of similar situation situation took place in eastern Poland when the Swedish Karl XII "strolled" through the region. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- "strolled" was a good one :) I modified the ref slightly, thanks Skäpperöd (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I've filed a request for mediation here [13].radek (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
AE request involving you
I mention you here. Varsovian (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)