User talk:You Can Act Like A Man: Difference between revisions
→Discretionary sanctions warning: new section |
|||
Line 1,328: | Line 1,328: | ||
:::I've removed your comment(s) again, hope you don't mind - just appears confusing otherwise! [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
:::I've removed your comment(s) again, hope you don't mind - just appears confusing otherwise! [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::I suppose it would rather ''hang'' in mid-air slightly....! Cheers. <font face="Georgia">[[User:You Can Act Like A Man|<span style="color:Green">'''Basket''' </span><sub><span style="color:orange">'''Feudalist''' </span></sub>]]</font> 17:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
:::I suppose it would rather ''hang'' in mid-air slightly....! Cheers. <font face="Georgia">[[User:You Can Act Like A Man|<span style="color:Green">'''Basket''' </span><sub><span style="color:orange">'''Feudalist''' </span></sub>]]</font> 17:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Discretionary sanctions warning == |
|||
Per [[WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES]], all articles that "could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland" are under a [[WP:1RR]] restriction and are subject to [[WP:DS|discretionary sanctions]]. You just came very close to violating the 1RR - please take more care in the future, and consider your tone when discussing these articles with other editors. Thanks. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|<span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span>]] 18:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:04, 21 February 2013
You Can Act Like A Man (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom run
Unfortunately, you are not eligible to run for ArbCom this year because you do not meet the required edit count. Please read WP:NOTNOW - it is written to those applying for administrator, but is also applicable for ArbCom candidates, as the standard for ArbCom is even higher. Thank you. --Rschen7754 02:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Basket Feudalist (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- If an administrator would spell out the terms of a mentoring program, I would be willing to help facilitate one. I've never done it before, so it would largely be on the job training, but I think that I can be of some help. I would just want to know what kind of mentoring would be needed. Traditional adoption? Just a few lessons? --Go Phightins! 02:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm thinking it's just a bit of an "interpersonal skills" issue that we have here. (Again, I hope Mr Basket will not be offended at this suggestion.) Anyone who's been around wikipedia a while and has plenty of editing experience should be able to give him the right kind of advice/assistance, as long as they are willing to give the time to it. In your case, it looks like you're not really working in the same subject area, which would make you more objective and thus a good candidate. Deb (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- So what would exactly be expected of me? Running him through some lessons from here such as five pillars, dispute resolution, and policies? Or just generally monitoring his contributions? Go Phightins! 20:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say you'd be someone he could go to when he couldn't decide what to do - particularly when faced with some kind of dispute. On his part, it would be evidence of good faith and a wish to avoid any conduct that might lead to a block in the future. Deb (talk) 12:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- So what would exactly be expected of me? Running him through some lessons from here such as five pillars, dispute resolution, and policies? Or just generally monitoring his contributions? Go Phightins! 20:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm thinking it's just a bit of an "interpersonal skills" issue that we have here. (Again, I hope Mr Basket will not be offended at this suggestion.) Anyone who's been around wikipedia a while and has plenty of editing experience should be able to give him the right kind of advice/assistance, as long as they are willing to give the time to it. In your case, it looks like you're not really working in the same subject area, which would make you more objective and thus a good candidate. Deb (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Joeoconnell82a.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joeoconnell82a.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Joeoconnell82a.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joeoconnell82a.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access. Template:Z20 |
- Hi Floater thanks for the offer of help and apologies for the slight delay in response! The image that is to be deleted; I think it is copyright free (from an election pamphlet) but I didn't understand the file tagging! Any advice appreciated! Basket Feudalist 12:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Suggest
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Battle of Mortimer's Cross
I'll be honest, I don't even remember being there. I'm sure it's worth expanding and improving, and I don't see any issues with what you've done. Any typos, etc, can be corrected as we go along. Deb (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Request.
{{admin help}} This article Martin O'Connell (Irish republican) needs to be moved as per WP:COMMON to Joe O'Connell (Irish republican) as Joe rather than Martin was the name he was familiarly known by (as the image shows)- I tried moving the article to the new page but it wouldn't let me. Thanks in advance! Basket Feudalist 17:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done. You need to provide a non-free use rationale for the image, which should refer to the new title as the article where the image is used. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks John. Is it absolutely certain that there is no free-use of it? It was originally a leaflet publically distributed. Thanks for your advice either way. Basket Feudalist 18:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Image copyright is a pain.
- If it is a "free" image, it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, which makes it available to all the Wikimedia projects. But "free" means that it is demonstrable that the image is in the "public domain" (which is a technical term in copyright law and does not mean "available to the public"), or it is available under a license compatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA. You could try asking at commons:Commons:Upload help, but I don't think there is any chance that having been used as a poster or handed out as a leaflet is enough - the copyright still belongs to somebody, and the fact that nobody knows who that is is not a reason for ignoring it.
- If it is not free, it can still be used on the English Wikipedia under a "Fair use rationale", if it meets all ten of the conditions at WP:NFCC, which should be possible here. A FUR needs to be supplied for each article that uses it (only one, in this case), and there is Template:Non-free use rationale that you can use.
- General advice at WP:Image use policy. JohnCD (talk) 18:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Gotya! -I'll deal with that ASAP.. i.e., probably tomorrow now! -but thanks. Basket Feudalist 18:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Image copyright is a pain.
- Thanks John. Is it absolutely certain that there is no free-use of it? It was originally a leaflet publically distributed. Thanks for your advice either way. Basket Feudalist 18:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
May I interest you in something I have been trying to create?
User: TheOriginalSoni/Rolling Ball - A place where new and old editors alike can freely discuss things, ideas and projects. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Userbox
Hey You Can Act Like A Man. Here is a userbox you might like to add on your user page:
Cheers. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 10:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- You can find more at this page! CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 22:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, The page is up and running. We also have a Wikipedia:Rolling Ball/Hang Out Zone for everyone to discuss whatever they want. You are also requested to watchlist/keep and eye on the Hangout page so you can keep track of whatever everyone's talking about. Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Umm... Your name is not there at the TAFI page... Did you actually join it? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) (Leave a Talkback)
- Also, please make the colours in your talk page a bit more lighter... Its not easy to read against such a bright green and orange, but it will be visible against a maybe lighter shade of them TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Some inquiry
Hi You Can Act Like A Man, I am a bit confused about the article creation process, and I would be grateful if you could rid my confusion. As far as I can remember, I never had to undergo the article submission and approval process earlier for new article creation in Wikipedia before. Has there been any change in the protocol lately or did I initiate a wrong protocol? I must confess that it was very long ago that I had created any new article. I would be grateful if you could approve it soon, so that my wiki friends can work on it too. The article as it stands is a rough draft that I had removed from another article, since the story was getting too long. I hope to work on it in coming months, but accessing the article via Article Creation link feels too clumsy. I hope you understand. (Manoguru (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC))
Please comment on Talk:Marseille
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Marseille. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Are you interested in welcoming and reporting new users? I figured it might be good if I could interest you in this under-development script thats being developed. Maybe you will find something interesting here.
And thanks for the colour change - It looks a lot better now.
Cheers! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks TOSoni, it's a lot easier on my eyes too!!! -yes I'd be pleased to do something like that, sounds interesting. Although I haven't got much more time on my hands than most people (I guess), I'm getting into doing new things here. Basket Feudalist 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Same here :) Do look into Snuggle and leave your comments there. I found it very useful in figuring out who to send Welcome templates. Hopefully the newer editors who get those welcomes find the community side of Wikipedia, and some decide to actually stay here! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is it 'live' and ready for use yet? I've signed my name Basket Feudalist 19:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- There's a working prototype thats available. I often use it just to keep an eye out for promising and disruptive newcomers. Then I manually go to their respective pages and send the necessary Welcome or ARV tags. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think there will be more features added later on. Those will probably make sure we can use Snuggle to send the welcomes etc. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is it 'live' and ready for use yet? I've signed my name Basket Feudalist 19:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Same here :) Do look into Snuggle and leave your comments there. I found it very useful in figuring out who to send Welcome templates. Hopefully the newer editors who get those welcomes find the community side of Wikipedia, and some decide to actually stay here! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Are you quite sure about this AfC decline you made? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The forbes reference checks out. There is a Navin Laddha, and he is indeed the owner of Mayfield corp. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi both, Demiuge, thanks for pointing that out: the short answer is, "no way!". I must have clicked the wrong reason. Can it be changed? Soni, I know Forbes must be WP:RS (and if he's in that he must be notable, right?) but half the other links are to the aon site? Do you both reckon it was a bad call?Basket Feudalist 19:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've told the article creator that the aon refs are basically worthless and should be removed. He's going to reformat things and maybe add some more refs and then resubmit it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Excellent, cheers for that. You unwittingly save my reputation (HA!) such as it is Basket Feudalist 20:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Notable? I think so. So it was a bad call on the tag that was placed. Not quite sure whether it still fails the AfC or not. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've told the article creator that the aon refs are basically worthless and should be removed. He's going to reformat things and maybe add some more refs and then resubmit it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi both, Demiuge, thanks for pointing that out: the short answer is, "no way!". I must have clicked the wrong reason. Can it be changed? Soni, I know Forbes must be WP:RS (and if he's in that he must be notable, right?) but half the other links are to the aon site? Do you both reckon it was a bad call?Basket Feudalist 19:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for your great efforts it has been gratefully appreciated, you are a star! Ladytwentytwo (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC) |
TODD PEDERSEN article:
You commented that my AfC on Pedersen looked "dodgey". How so? I can fix that if it is. Thanks! Oldnoah (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Oldnoah
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred A. Thorne, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen's College, Dunelm and Georgetown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jewish diaspora
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish diaspora. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Certificates of Claim
You have recently reviewed the article I created on Certificates of Claim and awarded it a C-grade, which I find both inexplicable and unacceptable.
The criteria for this grade is that the article "...is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material..." and it, "...may need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research." For the reader it is "...useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study." In other words, the article lacks credibility.
I guess from your profile that you may not have much knowledge of colonial Nyasaland nor of the legal issues surrounding the land issues there, but you have presumably had some basis for your judgement. Could you please therefore draw my attention to:
1. What important content is missing or what material is irrelevant?
2. Where it is unclear, unbalanced or not flowing?
3. Where there is bias or original research?
4. Why it does not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study?
Admittedly I am the author, but I don't see how it fails to gain a GA-grade om its merits. If you can find a better summary of the topic let me know.
Finally, I have gone to a significant amount of time and trouble to prepare this article because as someone who has both lived and worked in Malawi and studied it academically, I want it to be better-known and reported. However, it is extremely demotivating to be told what, in the face of it, is a wholly credible article is third or fourth rate.
I would therefore ask you either to review and upwardly revise your grading or justify it in detail.
Shscoulsdon (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
I really do apologise old man, I thought that was exactly hat had been awarded. Unfortunately, 90% of articles that are accepted are C-class or stubs, so that sometimes it is habit forming. A lapse of concentration, I'm afraid. Au contraire neither my profile nor my interests prevent me from recognising a good article when I see one! Anyway, dispense with your demotivation, and carry on!!!. Thanks for alerting me. Basket Feudalist 15:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks, I have a number of Malawi-related articled in course of preparation and hope to put these up soon. Regards, Shscoulsdon (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Aćif Hadžiahmetović
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Aćif Hadžiahmetović. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cooper Square
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cooper Square. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Germans
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Germans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Nantucket
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nantucket. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
GA?
Robert Langs, seriously? Where is the nomination and where is the review page per the process at Wikipedia:Good article nominations? I am going to demote this one as out of process. --ukexpat (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Huh Maybe he's my dad LOL Basket Feudalist 21:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, friend
I have written a proposed remedy to the Richard Arthur Norton affair, to be taken to AN/I in the event that ArbCom defers the case. Since the original thread is hatted, the proposal has been made on his talk page (User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_)). As you were a participant in the original thread, I would very much appreciate your comments as to whether the proposed remedy satisfies your concerns. Thanks, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 23:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:John Calvin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Calvin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Herero and Namaqua Genocide
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Herero and Namaqua Genocide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:John Calvin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Calvin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Guns, Germs, and Steel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guns, Germs, and Steel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Talk:Westboro Baptist Church, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. - MrX 13:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joe O'Connell (Irish republican), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Auric talk 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you're watching this page, sweetcheeks. Don't ever template me again. Your reversion is the reversion of a revert. Thúighim tú??? Basket Feudalist 17:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
The Tea Leaf - Issue Seven
Hello again! We have some neat updates about the Teahouse:
- We’ve added badges! Teahouse awards is a pilot project to learn how acknowledgement impacts engagement and retention in Teahouse and Wikipedia.
- We’ve got a new WikiLove Badge script that makes giving badges quick and easy. Add it here. You can give out badges to thank helpful hosts, welcome guests, acknowledge great questions and more.
- Come join the experiment and let us know what you think!
- And...for all of your great work and all of the progress that you've helped the Teahouse make, we hereby award you the Host Badge:
Teahouse Host Badge | |
Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time. Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden. |
- You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here
Thanks again! Ocaasi 02:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Shark Island Extermination Camp
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shark Island Extermination Camp. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Feudal Contracts of Indenture.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Schenka (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:February 2013 nor'easter
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:February 2013 nor'easter. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Just a quickie follow up, if you are confident that text is lifted off another website, remove it immediately, and if the entire article is copied, propose it for speedy deletion via {{db-copyvio}}. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks mate. I already declined the AfC though I'm afraid (on the grounds i gave)- so can it still be deleted etc? Basket Feudalist 12:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the Gxx ("general") CSD criteria (such as copyright - which is G12), apply to absolutely any page on Wikipedia, and speedy deleting AfC submissions as copyvios is fair game. A copyright violation is a copyright violation, regardless of where it appears. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks mate. I already declined the AfC though I'm afraid (on the grounds i gave)- so can it still be deleted etc? Basket Feudalist 12:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
http: //indianarmy.nic.in/Site/FormTemplete/frmTemp1PTC3C_1.aspx?MnId=LBt/XEEwz1vtrcm2C4ZWJw==&ParentID=O9qo4YLDWEhPEXNQwu8Fiw==
India: Foreign Policy & Government Guide Vol. I, International Business Publications, USA, 2011
http: //www.indianetzone.com/50/army_service_corps.htm
You Can Act Like A Man, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello You Can Act Like A Man! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Slavery in Africa
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavery in Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Buchenwald Trial
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Buchenwald Trial. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:History of Vojvodina
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of Vojvodina. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Please comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ford
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ford. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
TAFI
Hello,
The Project is almost ready to hit the Main Page, where it will be occupying a section just below "Did you Know" section. Three article from the weekly batch of 7 will be displayed randomly at the main page, the format of which can be seen at the Main Page sandbox. There is also an ongoing discussion at the Main page talk over the final details before we can go forward with the Main Page. If you have any ideas to discuss with everyone else, please visit the TAFI Talk Page and join in on the ongoing discussions there. You are also invited to add new nominations, and comment and suport on the current ones at the Nominations page. You can also help by helping in the discussions at the Holding Area. Above all, please do not forget to improve our current Today's Articles for Improvement Thank you and hoping to have some productive work from you at the Project, |
Thank you!!! for adding "Major Edit" tag on "Impalement"!!
I ceratainly prefer to be "alone" about restructuring of article here; thought about doing this prior to GA nomination, on basis of short thrift there, have decided to comprise article in major way to make it more readable to less ghoulish readers than myself. :-)Arildnordby (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Allah Las article rejection
The article I submitted for review about the Allah Las was rejected for not having references that proved its noteworthiness (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Allah_Las).
Among other sources, the article referenced: 1. NPR's national website 2. LA Weekly, a major LA news and events periodical 3. Amoeba Music's website, one of the largest (if not the largest) independent record stores in the Unites States that is also known as an arbiter of up and coming musical acts
The references in the Allah Las article seem every bit as strong as the sources cited in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Growlers
Can you please clarify?
Jeffrey.stottlemyer (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Some falafel for you!
Thank you for accepting my article! :) Raad17 (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:Ahbashism campaign
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ahbashism campaign. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
YuMe
Hi,
You reviewed my submission, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/YuMe
I have updated it to reflect your comment of it not being written encyclopaedically. This is my first Wiki entry. I hope the edits suffice. Let me know your thoughts. I appreciate your help and patience with me in getting this published.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missmichellemeyer (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:East–West Schism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:East–West Schism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I have removed your "brick wall" comment from this talk page. Although editors stated it should be struck, I would go further as I predict this editor would pounce on it as evidence of Wikipedia being a troublesome and problematic environment. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Which it might be... for him Fair do's though, I would've done as requested but AFK there, making a hot toddy. Basket Feudalist 16:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've removed your comment(s) again, hope you don't mind - just appears confusing otherwise! GiantSnowman 17:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- I suppose it would rather hang in mid-air slightly....! Cheers. Basket Feudalist 17:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Which it might be... for him Fair do's though, I would've done as requested but AFK there, making a hot toddy. Basket Feudalist 16:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions warning
Per WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES, all articles that "could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland" are under a WP:1RR restriction and are subject to discretionary sanctions. You just came very close to violating the 1RR - please take more care in the future, and consider your tone when discussing these articles with other editors. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)