Jump to content

Mencius: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jiang (talk | contribs)
m fmt to fit 300px
 
(845 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Confucian philosopher (c. 371 – c. 289 BC)}}
{| cellpadding=3px cellspacing=0px width="300px" bgcolor=#f7f8ff style="float:right; border:2px solid; margin:5px"
{{About|the ancient Chinese philosopher|the book|Mencius (book)}}
|colspan=2 align=center style="border-top:2px solid"|[[Image: Mencius1.jpg|center|250px|Mencius]]
{{Family name hatnote|[[Meng (surname)|Meng]]|lang=Chinese}}
|-
{{Infobox philosopher
!style="background:#ccf; border-bottom:2px solid" colspan=2|Mencius
| image = Half Portraits of the Great Sage and Virtuous Men of Old - Meng Ke (孟軻).jpg
|-
| caption = As depicted in the album ''Half Portraits of the Great Sage and Virtuous Men of Old'' ({{lang|zh|至聖先賢半身像}}){{snd}}held by the [[National Palace Museum]] in Taipei
|align=right style="border-top:1px solid"|[[Chinese family name|Ancestral name]] (&#22995;):||style="border-top:1px solid"|J&#299; <small>([[Chinese language|Ch]]: </small>&#23020;<small>)</small>
|birth_name = Meng Ke
|-
|birth_date = {{circa|371&nbsp;BC}}
|align=right style="border-top:1px solid"|[[Chinese clan name|Clan name]] (&#27663;):||style="border-top:1px solid"|Mèng&sup1; <small>(Ch: </small>&#23391;<small>)</small>
| birth_place = [[Zou (state)|Zou]], Zhou dynasty {{nwr|(modern [[Zoucheng]], Shandong)}}
|-
| death_date = {{circa|289&nbsp;BC}}
|align=right style="border-top:1px solid"|[[Chinese given name|Given name]] (&#21517;):||style="border-top:1px solid"|K&#275; <small>(Ch: </small>&#36603;<small>)</small>
| death_place = Zou, Zhou dynasty
|-
| region = [[Chinese philosophy]]
|align=right style="border-top:3px solid"|[[Chinese courtesy name|Courtesy name]] (&#23383;):||style="border-top:3px solid"|Unknown&sup2;
| era = [[Ancient philosophy]]
|-
| school_tradition = [[Confucianism]]
|align=right style="border-top:1px solid"|[[Posthumous name]] (&#35610;):||style="border-top:1px solid"|Master Meng the Second Sage&sup3;
| main_interests = [[Ethics]], [[social philosophy]], [[political philosophy]]
|-
| notable_ideas = {{hlist|[[Right to revolution]] as an aspect of the [[Mandate of Heaven]]|Goodness of human nature}}
|align=right | ||<small>(Ch: </small>&#20126;&#32854;&#23391;&#23376;<small> ; Py: Yàshèng Mèngz&#464;)
| module = {{Infobox Chinese|child=yes
|-
| c = {{linktext|孟子}}
|align=right style="border-top:1px solid"|Styled:||style="border-top:1px solid"|Master Meng&sup4;
| l = "Master Meng"
|-
| bpmf = {{bpmfsp|ㄇㄥˋ|ㄗˇ}}
|align=right| ||<small>(Ch: </small>&#23391;&#23376;; <small>Py: Mèngz&#464;)</small>
| p = Mèngzǐ
|-
| tp = Mèng-zǐh
|colspan=2 align=left style="border-top:3px solid"|<small><sup>'''1'''</sup> The original clan name was Mengsun (</small>&#23391;&#23403;<small>), but was shortened into Meng (</small>&#23391;<small>), before or after Mencius's life, it is not possible to say.
| w = Meng4-tzu3
|-
| mi = {{IPAc-cmn|m|eng|4|.|zi|3}}
|align=right |
| myr = Mèngdž
|-
| j = Maang6 zi2
|colspan=2 align=left |<small><sup>'''2'''</sup> Traditionally, his courtesy name was assumed to be Ziche (</small>&#23376;&#36554;<small>), sometimes incorrectly written as Ziyu (</small>&#23376;&#36671;<small>) or Ziju (</small>&#23376;&#23621;<small>), but recent scholarly works show that these courtesy names appeared in the 3rd century AD and apply to another historical figure named Meng Ke who also lived in Chinese antiquity and was mistaken for Mencius.
| y = Maahngjí
|-
| ci = {{IPAc-yue|m|aang|6|-|z|i|2}}
|align=right |
| tl = Bīng-tsú
|-
| poj = Bēng-chú
|colspan=2 align=left |<small><sup>'''3'''</sup> I.e. the 2nd sage after [[Confucius]]. Posthumous name given in [[1530]] by the [[Jiajing Emperor]]. In the two centuries preceding 1530, the posthumous name was "The Second Sage Duke of Zou" (</small>&#37138;&#22283;&#20126;&#32854;&#20844;<small>) which is still the name that can be seen carved in the Mencius ancestral temple in [[Zoucheng]].
| wuu = Man-tsy
|-
| mc = Mæ̀ng-tzí
|align=right |
| oc-bs = &ast;{{IPA|mˤraŋ-s tsəʔ}}
|-
| altname = Birth name
|colspan=2 align=left |<small><sup>'''4'''</sup>Romanized as Mencius.
| c2 = 孟軻
|}
| p2 = Mèng Kē
}}}}
{{Confucianism}}
'''Mencius'''{{efn|Alternatively '''Mengzi''', born '''Meng Ke'''.}} ({{respell|MEN|shee|əs}}; {{circa|371|289&nbsp;BC}}) was a Chinese [[Confucian]] philosopher, often described as the '''Second Sage''' ({{lang|zh|亞聖}}) to reflect his traditional esteem relative to [[Confucius]] himself. He was part of Confucius's fourth generation of disciples, inheriting his ideology and developing it further.<ref>Mei, Yi Pao (1985). "Mencius", ''The New Encyclopedia Britannica'', v. 8, p. 3.</ref><ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|last=Shun|first=Kwong Loi|title=Mencius|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/mencius/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|access-date=18 November 2017}}</ref> Living during the [[Warring States period]], he is said to have spent much of his life travelling around the states offering counsel to different rulers. Conversations with these rulers form the basis of the ''[[Mencius (book)|Mencius]]'', which would later be canonised as a [[Confucian classic]].


One primary principle of his work is that human nature is righteous and humane. The responses of citizens to the policies of rulers embodies this principle, and a state with righteous and humane policies will flourish by nature. The citizens, with freedom from good rule, will then allocate time to caring for their wives, brothers, elders, and children, and be educated with rites and naturally become better citizens. This placed him at odds with his near contemporary, [[Xun Kuang|Xunzi]], who believed that human nature is evil by birth.<ref>{{Citation |last=Goldin |first=Paul R. |title=Xunzi |date=2018 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/xunzi/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Fall 2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2022-05-15}}</ref>
'''Mencius''' (most accepted dates: [[372 BC]] - [[289 BC]]; other possible dates: [[385 BC]] - [[303 BC]] or [[302 BC]]) was born in the [[State of Zou]] (&#37138;&#22283;), now forming the territory of the [[county-level city]] of [[Zoucheng]] (&#37049;&#22478;&#24066;), [[Shandong]] province, only 30 km.(18 miles) south of [[Qufu]], the town of [[Confucius]]. He was an itinerant [[China|Chinese]] [[philosopher]] and sage, and one of the principal interpreters of [[Confucianism]]. Like [[Confucius]], according to legend, he travelled China for forty years to offer advice to rulers for reform. He served as an official during the [[Warring States]] (403 - 221 BC) in the [[State of Qi]] (&#40778; qì) from [[319 BC]] to [[312 BC]]. He expressed his filial devotion when he took an absence of three years from his official duties for Qi to mourn his mother's death. Disappointed at his failure to effect changes in his contemporary world, he retired from public life.
{{anchor|History|Biography}}


==Life==
A follower of [[Confucianism]], Mencius argued for the infinite goodness of the individual, believing that it was society's influence&mdash;its lack of a positive cultivating influence&mdash;which caused bad character. He even argued that it was acceptable for people to overthrow or even kill a ruler who ignored the people's needs and ruled harshly. Mencius argued that human beings are born with an innate moral sense which society has corrupted, and that the goal of moral cultivation is to return to one's innate morality.
Mencius was born '''Meng Ke''' in the [[state of Zou]], in what is now [[Zoucheng]], Shandong. He was an itinerant philosopher and sage, and one of the principal interpreters of [[Confucianism]]. He was supposedly a pupil of Confucius's grandson [[Zisi]] ({{circa|481|402&nbsp;BC}}). Like Confucius, according to legend, he travelled throughout China for forty years to offer advice to rulers for reform.<ref>Chan 1963: 49.</ref> During the [[Warring States period]] ({{circa|475}}{{snd}}221&nbsp;BC), Mencius served as an official and scholar at the [[Jixia Academy]] in the [[state of Qi]] from 319 to 312&nbsp;BC. He expressed his [[filial piety]] when he took three years leave of absence from his official duties for Qi to mourn his mother's death. Disappointed at his failure to effect changes in his contemporary world, he retired from public life.<ref>[[Jaroslav Průšek]] and Zbigniew Słupski, eds., Dictionary of Oriental Literatures: East Asia (Charles Tuttle, 1978): 115-116.</ref>


Mencius was buried in the [[Cemetery of Mencius]] ({{zhi|c=孟子林|p=Mèngzi lín}}), located {{cvt|12|km}} to the northeast of Zoucheng's central urban area. A [[stele]] carried by a giant [[bixi (tortoise)|stone tortoise]] and crowned with dragons stands in front of his grave.<ref>[http://www.infobase.gov.cn/intro/fjms/l8/l8016/index.htm 孟子林] {{webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120805110526/http://www.infobase.gov.cn/intro/fjms/l8/l8016/index.htm |date=2012-08-05 }} (Mencius Cemetery)</ref>
Mencius' interpretation of Confucianism has generally been considered the orthodox version by subsequent Chinese philosophers, especially the [[Neo-Confucian]]s of the [[Song dynasty]]. '''''Mencius''''' (also spelled '''''Mengzi''''' or '''''Meng-tzu'''''), a book of his conversations with kings of the time, is one of the [[Four books]] which form the core of orthodox Confucian thinking. In contrast to the sayings of Confucius which are short and self-contained, ''Mencius'' consists of long dialogues with extensive prose.


===Mother===
Mencius spoke frequently and highly of the [[well-field system]].
{{Anchor|Mencius's mother}}Mencius's mother is often held up as an exemplary female figure in Chinese culture. One of the most famous traditional ''[[chengyu]]'' is {{zhc|c=孟母三遷|p=mèngmǔ sānqiān|l=Mencius's mother moves three times}}); this saying refers to the legend that Mencius's mother moved houses three times before finding a location that she felt was suitable for the child's upbringing. As an expression, the idiom refers to the importance of finding the proper environment for raising children.

Mencius's father Meng Ji ({{zhi|t=孟激}}) died when Mencius was very young. His mother Zhang ({{lang|zh|仉}}) or [[Meng Mu]] ({{zhi|t=孟母}}) {{clarify|reason=name?|date=July 2021}} raised her son alone. They were very poor. At first they lived by a cemetery, where the mother found her son imitating the paid mourners in funeral processions. Therefore, the mother decided to move. The next house was near a market in the town. There the boy began to imitate the cries of butchers. So the mother moved to a house next to a school. Inspired by the scholars and students, Mencius began to study. His mother decided to remain, and Mencius became a scholar.

Another story further illustrates the emphasis that Mencius's mother placed on her son's education. As the story goes, once when Mencius was young, he was a truant. His mother responded to his apparent disregard for his education by taking up a pair of scissors and cutting the cloth she had been weaving in front of him. This was intended to illustrate that one cannot stop a task midway, and her example inspired Mencius to be diligent in his studies.

There is another legend about his mother and his wife, involving a time when his wife was at home alone and was discovered by Mencius not to be sitting properly. Mencius thought his wife had violated a rite, and demanded a divorce. His mother claimed that it was written in ''The Book of Rites'' that before a person entered a room, he should announce his imminent presence loudly to let others prepare for his arrival; as he had not done that in this case, the person who had violated the rite was Mencius himself. Eventually Mencius admitted his fault.

She is one of 125 women of which biographies have been included in the ''[[Biographies of Exemplary Women]]'', written by [[Liu Xiang (scholar)|Liu Xiang]].

== Key ideas ==
{{main|Mencius (book)}}
[[File:Mencius.jpg|thumb|Mencius, from ''Myths and Legends of China'' (1922) by E. T. C. Werner]]

===Human nature===
Mencius expounds on the concept that the human is naturally righteous and humane. It is the influence of society that causes bad [[moral character]]. Mencius describes this in the context of educating rulers and citizens about the nature of man. "He who exerts his mind to the utmost knows his nature"<ref>The ''Mencius'' 7:A1 in Chan 1963: 78.</ref> and "the way of learning is none other than finding the lost mind."<ref>The ''Mencius'' 6:A11 in Chan 1963: 58.</ref>

=== The four beginnings ===
To show innate goodness, Mencius used the example of a child falling down a well.
{{cquote|Witnesses of this event immediately feel alarm and distress, not to gain friendship with the child's parents, nor to seek the praise of their neighbors and friends, nor because they dislike the reputation [of lack of humanity if they did not rescue the child]...

The feeling of commiseration definitely is the beginning of humanity;
the feeling of shame and dislike is the beginning of righteousness;
the feeling of deference and compliance is the beginning of propriety;
and the feeling of right or wrong is the beginning of wisdom.

Men have these Four Beginnings just as they have their four limbs. Having these Four Beginnings, but saying that they cannot develop them is to destroy themselves.<ref>The ''Mencius'' 2A:6 in Chan 1963: 65. Formatting has been applied to ease readability.</ref>}}

Human nature has an innate tendency towards goodness, but moral rightness cannot be instructed down to the last detail. This is why merely external controls always fail in improving society. True improvement results from educational cultivation in favorable environments. Likewise, bad environments tend to corrupt the human will. This, however, is not proof of innate evil because a clear thinking person would avoid causing harm to others. This position of Mencius puts him between Confucians such as [[Xunzi (philosopher)|Xunzi]], who thought people were innately bad, and Taoists who believed humans did not need cultivation, they just needed to accept their innate, natural, and effortless goodness. The four beginnings/sprouts could grow and develop, or they could fail. In this way Mencius synthesized integral parts of Taoism into Confucianism. Individual effort was needed to cultivate oneself, but one's natural tendencies were good to begin with. The object of education is the cultivation of benevolence (''[[Ren (philosophy)|ren]]'').{{Citation needed|date=April 2022}}

===Education===
[[File:Great Confucian Figures - Painting of Mengzi by Kanō Sansetsu.jpg|thumb|upright=1|Painting of Mencius by [[Kanō Sansetsu]] (1632)]]
According to Mencius, education must awaken the innate abilities of the human mind. He denounced memorization and advocated active interrogation of the text, saying "One who believes all of a book would be better off without books" ({{zhi|t=盡信書,則不如無書}}, from {{zhi|t=孟子.盡心下}}). One should check for internal consistency by comparing sections and debate the probability of factual accounts by comparing them with experience.{{Citation needed|date=February 2010}}

===Destiny===
Mencius also believed in the power of Destiny in shaping the roles of human beings in society. What is destined cannot be contrived by the human intellect or foreseen. Destiny is shown when a path arises that is both unforeseen and constructive. Destiny should not be confused with Fate. Mencius denied that Heaven would protect a person regardless of his actions, saying, "One who understands Destiny will not stand beneath a tottering wall". The proper path is one which is natural and unforced. This path must also be maintained because, "Unused pathways are covered with weeds." One who follows Destiny will live a long and successful life. One who rebels against Destiny will die before his time.{{Citation needed|date=April 2022}}

===Politics and economics===

Mencius emphasized the significance of the common citizens in the state. While Confucianism generally regards rulers highly, he argued that it is acceptable for the subjects to overthrow or even kill a ruler who ignores the people's needs and rules harshly. This is because a ruler who does not rule justly is no longer a true ruler. Speaking of the overthrow of the wicked [[King Zhou of Shang]], Mencius said, "I have merely heard of killing a villain Zhou, but I have not heard of murdering [him as] the ruler."<ref>The ''Mencius'' 1B:8 in Chan 1963: 62.</ref>

This saying should not be taken as an instigation to violence against authorities but as an application of Confucian philosophy to society. Confucianism requires a clarification of what may be reasonably expected in any given relationship. All relationships should be beneficial, but each has its own principle or inner logic. A ruler must justify his position by acting benevolently before he can expect reciprocation from the people. In this view, a king is like a steward. Although Confucius admired kings of great accomplishment, Mencius is clarifying the proper hierarchy of human society. Although a king has presumably higher status than a commoner, he is actually subordinate to the masses of people and the resources of society. Otherwise, there would be an implied disregard of the potential of human society heading into the future. One is significant only for what one gives, not for what one takes.{{Citation needed|date=April 2022}}

Mencius distinguished between superior men who recognize and follow the virtues of righteousness and benevolence and inferior men who do not. He suggested that superior men considered only righteousness, not benefits. That assumes "permanent property" to uphold common morality.<ref>Yagi, Kiichiro (2008). "China, economics in," ''[[The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics]], v. 1, p. 778. [http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000577&edition=current&q=mencius&topicid=&result_number=1 Abstract.]</ref> To secure benefits for the disadvantaged and the aged, he advocated [[free trade]], low [[tax rate]]s, and a more equal sharing of the [[tax burden]].<ref>[[Michael H. Hart|Hart, Michael H.]] (1978), ''The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History'', p. 480.</ref>

In regards to the Confucian perspective of the marketplace, more about Confucius’ thoughts from Mencius than from the philosopher himself are learned. The government should have a mostly hands-off approach regarding the marketplace.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Chen |first=Huanzhang |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/492146426 |title=The economic principles of Confucius and his school |date=1911 |publisher=Columbia University, Longmans, Green & Co., Agents; [etc., etc.] |oclc=492146426}}</ref> This was in part, to prevent state-run monopolies, however, it was also the state's responsibility to protect against future monopolies that might come into existence. Mencius also advocated for no taxes on imports; the market was to exchange for what you lacked so taxing merchants importing goods would ultimately hurt the villagers. The thought behind this is that people are inherently good and rational and can be trusted to regulate themselves, so price gouging or deception would not be an issue. Taxes on the property were acceptable and to be the only means by which the dukes and states would collect money. They did not need to collect much because taxes were only for supplemental funds.<ref name=":0" /> These taxes were also progressive, meaning the families that owned larger, more fertile pieces of land would pay more than the families with uniform land allotments. Scarcity is an issue in any market; however, Mencius emphasizes the reframing of the idea of a scarce resource.<ref>{{Cite book |date=2012-11-12 |title=The Analects of Confucius |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203715246 |doi=10.4324/9780203715246|isbn=9780203715246 |last1=Estate |first1=The Arthur Waley }}</ref> Instead of scarce, resources are to be seen as abundant. Resources are gained through work ethic not by any other means so there are no unfair competitions or gains. To preserve these natural resources, they needed to be used or harvested according to their cycles of growth or replenishing. In many cases, posterity has priority over profit.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Martin |first=Michael R. |date=1990-02-01 |title=David L. Hall and Roger T. Ames, Thinking Through Confucius, State University of New York Press, 19137. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15406253-01704005 |journal=Journal of Chinese Philosophy |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=495–503 |doi=10.1163/15406253-01704005 |issn=0301-8121}}</ref>

==Influence==
[[File:Temple of Mencius - possibly Yuan bixi near Qisheng Hall - P1050933.JPG|thumb|upright|A [[Yuan dynasty]] [[bixi (tortoise)|turtle]] with a stele honoring Mencius]]
Mencius's interpretation of Confucianism has generally been considered the orthodox version by subsequent Chinese philosophers, especially by the [[Neo-Confucians]] of the [[Song dynasty]]. Mencius's disciples included a large number of feudal lords, and he is said to have been more influential than Confucius had been.<ref name="test">Charles O. Hucker, ''China to 1850: A Short History'', Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978, p. 45</ref>

The ''[[Mencius (book)|Mencius]]'' is one of the [[Four Books]] that [[Zhu Xi]] (1130–1200) grouped as the core of orthodox Neo-Confucian thought. In contrast to the sayings of Confucius, which are short and self-contained, the ''Mencius'' consists of long dialogues, including arguments, with extensive prose. It was generally neglected by the [[Jesuit China missions|Jesuit missionaries]] who first translated the Confucian canon into Latin and other European languages, as they felt that the Neo-Confucian school largely consisted of Buddhist and Taoist contamination of Confucianism. [[Matteo Ricci]] also particularly disliked what they had believed to be condemnation of celibacy as unfilial, which is rather a mistranslation of a similar word referring more to aspects of personality.{{Citation needed|date=November 2023}} [[François Noël (missionary)|François Noël]], who felt that Zhu's ideas represented a natural and native development of Confucius's thought, was the first to publish a full edition of the ''Mencius'' at [[Prague]] in 1711{{sfnp|Noël|1711}} as the [[Chinese Rites controversy]] had been recently decided against the [[Jesuits]]; however, his edition attained little influence outside central and eastern Europe.

In a 1978 book that estimated the hundred most influential persons in history to that point, Mencius was ranked at 92.<ref>[[Michael H. Hart|Hart, Michael H.]] (1978), ''The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History'', p. 7, discussed on pp. 479–81.</ref>

==Mencius Institute==
The first Mencius Institute was established in [[Xuzhou]], [[China]] in 2008 under a collaboration between [[Jiangsu Normal University]], China Zoucheng Heritage Tourism Bureau, and Xuzhou Mengshi Clan Friendship Network.<ref name = "UTARMenciusInstitute">{{cite web|url=https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2016/08/12/proud-addition-to-university-utar-campus-chosen-as-site-for-first-mencius-institute-outside-of-china/|title=Proud addition to university|work=The Star}}</ref>

First Mencius Institute outside of China is located at [[Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman|Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR)]] Kampar Campus, [[Malaysia]] in 2016.<ref name="UTARMenciusInstitute"/>


==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal|China|Biography|Philosophy}}
*[[Chinese philosophy]]
* [[Cheng Yi (philosopher)]]
* [[Lu Jiuyuan]]
* [[Wang Yangming]]

==Notes==
{{noteslist}}

==References==
===Citations===
{{Reflist|30em}}

===Bibliography===
{{refbegin}}
*Chan, Alan K. L. (ed.), 2002, ''Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations'', Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
*Chan, Wing-tsit (trans.), 1963, ''A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy'', Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
*Graham, A.C., 1993, ''Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China'', Chicago: Open Court Press. {{ISBN|0-8126-9087-7}}
*[[Mingyuan Hu]] (trans.), 2023, ''Virtue Politics: Mencius on Kingly Rule'', London: Hermits United.
*[[Philip J. Ivanhoe|Ivanhoe, Philip J.]], 2002, ''Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mencius and Wang Yangming'', 2nd edition, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
* {{citation |last=Liščák |first=Vladimir |title=Anthropologia Integra |volume=6 |date=2015 |issue=2 |contribution=François Noël and His Latin Translations of Confucian Classical Books Published in Prague in 1711 |pages=45–52 |contribution-url=https://www.academia.edu/19749487/Fran%C3%A7ois_No%C3%ABl_1651_1729_and_his_Latin_translations_of_Confucian_Classical_books_published_in_Prague_in_1711 }}.
* {{citation |editor-last=Liu |editor-first=Xiusheng |editor-mask=Liu Xiusheng |editor2-first=Philip J. |editor2-last=Ivanhoe |editor2-link=Philip J. Ivanhoe |display-editors=1 |date=2002 |title=Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi |location=Indianapolis |publisher=Hackett Publishing }}.
* {{citation |editor-last=Noël |editor-first=François |editor-link=Francois Noel (missionary) |contribution=Sinensis Imperii Liber Quartus Classicus Dictus Memcius, Sinicè Mem Tsu [The Fourth Classic Book of the Chinese Empire, Called the Mencius or, in Chinese, Mengzi] |contribution-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A0K0bjBLmMYC&pg=PA199 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A0K0bjBLmMYC |title=Sinensis Imperii Libri Classici Sex ''[''The Six Classic Books of the Chinese Empire'']'' |location=Prague |publisher=Charles-Ferdinand University Press |date=1711 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=A0K0bjBLmMYC&pg=PA199 199–472] }}. {{in lang|la}}
*[[David S. Nivison|Nivison, David S.]], 1996, ''The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy'', La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. (Includes a number of seminal essays on Mencius, including "Motivation and Moral Action in Mencius," "Two Roots or One?" and "On Translating Mencius.")
*Shun, Kwong-loi, 1997, ''Mencius and Early Chinese Thought'', Stanford: Stanford University Press.
*[[Bryan W. Van Norden|Van Norden, Bryan W.]] (trans.), 2008, ''Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries'', Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
*[[Bryan W. Van Norden|Van Norden, Bryan W.]], 2007, ''Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy'', New York: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 4 is on Mencius.)
*Wang, Robin R. (ed.), 2003, ''Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture: Writings from the Pre–Qin Period through the Song Dynasty'', Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (See the translation of the stories about Mencius's mother on pp.&nbsp;150–155.)
*Yearley, Lee H., 1990, ''Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage'', Albany: State University of New York Press.
{{refend}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
{{commons category|Mencius}}
*[http://www.hm.tyg.jp/~acmuller/contao/mencius.html English translation of the <i>Mencius</i> by Charles Muller]
{{wikiquote|Mencius}}
[[Category:Chinese thinkers]]
{{Collier's Poster|Mencius}}
[[Category:Confucian texts]]
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/mencius/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry]
[[Category:Korean confucianism]]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mencius/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry]
[[de:Mengzi]]
*[http://ctext.org/mengzi Mengzi]: Chinese text with English translation and links to [[Zhu Xi|Zhuxi]]'s commentary
[[eo:Mencius]]
*[http://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/mencius.html English translation by A. Charles Muller] Annotated scholarly translation with Chinese text
[[fr:Mencius]]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060529010501/http://www.the-philosopher.co.uk/good%26evil.htm Article discussing the view of ethics of Mencius from ''The Philosopher'']
[[hr:Mencije]]
*{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Mencius |volume=18 |pages=112–115 |first=James |last=Legge |short=1}}
[[ms:Mencius]]
* {{Gutenberg author |id=7977}}
[[ja:&#23391;&#23376;]]
* {{Internet Archive author}}
[[pl:Mencjusz]]

[[zh:&#23391;&#23376;]]
{{Chinese philosophy}}
{{Ethics}}
{{Social and political philosophy}}
{{Political philosophy}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:372 BC births]]
[[Category:289 BC deaths]]
[[Category:4th-century BC Chinese people]]
[[Category:4th-century BC Chinese philosophers]]
[[Category:3rd-century BC Chinese people]]
[[Category:3rd-century BC Chinese philosophers]]
[[Category:Chinese Confucianists]]
[[Category:Epistemologists]]
[[Category:Humanists]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:People from Jining]]
[[Category:Philosophers from Lu (state)]]
[[Category:Philosophers of culture]]
[[Category:Philosophers of education]]
[[Category:Philosophers of language]]
[[Category:Philosophers of law]]
[[Category:Philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:Chinese political philosophers]]
[[Category:Sinchang Maeng clan]]
[[Category:Social philosophers]]
[[Category:Zhou dynasty essayists]]
[[Category:Zhou dynasty philosophers]]
[[Category:4th-century BC Confucianists]]
[[Category:3rd-century BC Confucianists]]

Latest revision as of 01:49, 10 July 2024

Mencius
As depicted in the album Half Portraits of the Great Sage and Virtuous Men of Old (至聖先賢半身像) – held by the National Palace Museum in Taipei
Born
Meng Ke

c. 371 BC
Zou, Zhou dynasty (modern Zoucheng, Shandong)
Diedc. 289 BC
Zou, Zhou dynasty
EraAncient philosophy
RegionChinese philosophy
SchoolConfucianism
Main interests
Ethics, social philosophy, political philosophy
Notable ideas
Chinese name
Chinese孟子
Literal meaning"Master Meng"
Birth name
Chinese孟軻

Mencius[a] (MEN-shee-əs; c. 371 – c. 289 BC) was a Chinese Confucian philosopher, often described as the Second Sage (亞聖) to reflect his traditional esteem relative to Confucius himself. He was part of Confucius's fourth generation of disciples, inheriting his ideology and developing it further.[1][2] Living during the Warring States period, he is said to have spent much of his life travelling around the states offering counsel to different rulers. Conversations with these rulers form the basis of the Mencius, which would later be canonised as a Confucian classic.

One primary principle of his work is that human nature is righteous and humane. The responses of citizens to the policies of rulers embodies this principle, and a state with righteous and humane policies will flourish by nature. The citizens, with freedom from good rule, will then allocate time to caring for their wives, brothers, elders, and children, and be educated with rites and naturally become better citizens. This placed him at odds with his near contemporary, Xunzi, who believed that human nature is evil by birth.[3]

Life[edit]

Mencius was born Meng Ke in the state of Zou, in what is now Zoucheng, Shandong. He was an itinerant philosopher and sage, and one of the principal interpreters of Confucianism. He was supposedly a pupil of Confucius's grandson Zisi (c. 481 – c. 402 BC). Like Confucius, according to legend, he travelled throughout China for forty years to offer advice to rulers for reform.[4] During the Warring States period (c. 475 – 221 BC), Mencius served as an official and scholar at the Jixia Academy in the state of Qi from 319 to 312 BC. He expressed his filial piety when he took three years leave of absence from his official duties for Qi to mourn his mother's death. Disappointed at his failure to effect changes in his contemporary world, he retired from public life.[5]

Mencius was buried in the Cemetery of Mencius (孟子林; Mèngzi lín), located 12 km (7.5 mi) to the northeast of Zoucheng's central urban area. A stele carried by a giant stone tortoise and crowned with dragons stands in front of his grave.[6]

Mother[edit]

Mencius's mother is often held up as an exemplary female figure in Chinese culture. One of the most famous traditional chengyu is 孟母三遷 (mèngmǔ sānqiān; 'Mencius's mother moves three times')); this saying refers to the legend that Mencius's mother moved houses three times before finding a location that she felt was suitable for the child's upbringing. As an expression, the idiom refers to the importance of finding the proper environment for raising children.

Mencius's father Meng Ji (孟激) died when Mencius was very young. His mother Zhang () or Meng Mu (孟母) [clarification needed] raised her son alone. They were very poor. At first they lived by a cemetery, where the mother found her son imitating the paid mourners in funeral processions. Therefore, the mother decided to move. The next house was near a market in the town. There the boy began to imitate the cries of butchers. So the mother moved to a house next to a school. Inspired by the scholars and students, Mencius began to study. His mother decided to remain, and Mencius became a scholar.

Another story further illustrates the emphasis that Mencius's mother placed on her son's education. As the story goes, once when Mencius was young, he was a truant. His mother responded to his apparent disregard for his education by taking up a pair of scissors and cutting the cloth she had been weaving in front of him. This was intended to illustrate that one cannot stop a task midway, and her example inspired Mencius to be diligent in his studies.

There is another legend about his mother and his wife, involving a time when his wife was at home alone and was discovered by Mencius not to be sitting properly. Mencius thought his wife had violated a rite, and demanded a divorce. His mother claimed that it was written in The Book of Rites that before a person entered a room, he should announce his imminent presence loudly to let others prepare for his arrival; as he had not done that in this case, the person who had violated the rite was Mencius himself. Eventually Mencius admitted his fault.

She is one of 125 women of which biographies have been included in the Biographies of Exemplary Women, written by Liu Xiang.

Key ideas[edit]

Mencius, from Myths and Legends of China (1922) by E. T. C. Werner

Human nature[edit]

Mencius expounds on the concept that the human is naturally righteous and humane. It is the influence of society that causes bad moral character. Mencius describes this in the context of educating rulers and citizens about the nature of man. "He who exerts his mind to the utmost knows his nature"[7] and "the way of learning is none other than finding the lost mind."[8]

The four beginnings[edit]

To show innate goodness, Mencius used the example of a child falling down a well.

Witnesses of this event immediately feel alarm and distress, not to gain friendship with the child's parents, nor to seek the praise of their neighbors and friends, nor because they dislike the reputation [of lack of humanity if they did not rescue the child]...

The feeling of commiseration definitely is the beginning of humanity; the feeling of shame and dislike is the beginning of righteousness; the feeling of deference and compliance is the beginning of propriety; and the feeling of right or wrong is the beginning of wisdom.

Men have these Four Beginnings just as they have their four limbs. Having these Four Beginnings, but saying that they cannot develop them is to destroy themselves.[9]

Human nature has an innate tendency towards goodness, but moral rightness cannot be instructed down to the last detail. This is why merely external controls always fail in improving society. True improvement results from educational cultivation in favorable environments. Likewise, bad environments tend to corrupt the human will. This, however, is not proof of innate evil because a clear thinking person would avoid causing harm to others. This position of Mencius puts him between Confucians such as Xunzi, who thought people were innately bad, and Taoists who believed humans did not need cultivation, they just needed to accept their innate, natural, and effortless goodness. The four beginnings/sprouts could grow and develop, or they could fail. In this way Mencius synthesized integral parts of Taoism into Confucianism. Individual effort was needed to cultivate oneself, but one's natural tendencies were good to begin with. The object of education is the cultivation of benevolence (ren).[citation needed]

Education[edit]

Painting of Mencius by Kanō Sansetsu (1632)

According to Mencius, education must awaken the innate abilities of the human mind. He denounced memorization and advocated active interrogation of the text, saying "One who believes all of a book would be better off without books" (盡信書,則不如無書, from 孟子.盡心下). One should check for internal consistency by comparing sections and debate the probability of factual accounts by comparing them with experience.[citation needed]

Destiny[edit]

Mencius also believed in the power of Destiny in shaping the roles of human beings in society. What is destined cannot be contrived by the human intellect or foreseen. Destiny is shown when a path arises that is both unforeseen and constructive. Destiny should not be confused with Fate. Mencius denied that Heaven would protect a person regardless of his actions, saying, "One who understands Destiny will not stand beneath a tottering wall". The proper path is one which is natural and unforced. This path must also be maintained because, "Unused pathways are covered with weeds." One who follows Destiny will live a long and successful life. One who rebels against Destiny will die before his time.[citation needed]

Politics and economics[edit]

Mencius emphasized the significance of the common citizens in the state. While Confucianism generally regards rulers highly, he argued that it is acceptable for the subjects to overthrow or even kill a ruler who ignores the people's needs and rules harshly. This is because a ruler who does not rule justly is no longer a true ruler. Speaking of the overthrow of the wicked King Zhou of Shang, Mencius said, "I have merely heard of killing a villain Zhou, but I have not heard of murdering [him as] the ruler."[10]

This saying should not be taken as an instigation to violence against authorities but as an application of Confucian philosophy to society. Confucianism requires a clarification of what may be reasonably expected in any given relationship. All relationships should be beneficial, but each has its own principle or inner logic. A ruler must justify his position by acting benevolently before he can expect reciprocation from the people. In this view, a king is like a steward. Although Confucius admired kings of great accomplishment, Mencius is clarifying the proper hierarchy of human society. Although a king has presumably higher status than a commoner, he is actually subordinate to the masses of people and the resources of society. Otherwise, there would be an implied disregard of the potential of human society heading into the future. One is significant only for what one gives, not for what one takes.[citation needed]

Mencius distinguished between superior men who recognize and follow the virtues of righteousness and benevolence and inferior men who do not. He suggested that superior men considered only righteousness, not benefits. That assumes "permanent property" to uphold common morality.[11] To secure benefits for the disadvantaged and the aged, he advocated free trade, low tax rates, and a more equal sharing of the tax burden.[12]

In regards to the Confucian perspective of the marketplace, more about Confucius’ thoughts from Mencius than from the philosopher himself are learned. The government should have a mostly hands-off approach regarding the marketplace.[13] This was in part, to prevent state-run monopolies, however, it was also the state's responsibility to protect against future monopolies that might come into existence. Mencius also advocated for no taxes on imports; the market was to exchange for what you lacked so taxing merchants importing goods would ultimately hurt the villagers. The thought behind this is that people are inherently good and rational and can be trusted to regulate themselves, so price gouging or deception would not be an issue. Taxes on the property were acceptable and to be the only means by which the dukes and states would collect money. They did not need to collect much because taxes were only for supplemental funds.[13] These taxes were also progressive, meaning the families that owned larger, more fertile pieces of land would pay more than the families with uniform land allotments. Scarcity is an issue in any market; however, Mencius emphasizes the reframing of the idea of a scarce resource.[14] Instead of scarce, resources are to be seen as abundant. Resources are gained through work ethic not by any other means so there are no unfair competitions or gains. To preserve these natural resources, they needed to be used or harvested according to their cycles of growth or replenishing. In many cases, posterity has priority over profit.[15]

Influence[edit]

A Yuan dynasty turtle with a stele honoring Mencius

Mencius's interpretation of Confucianism has generally been considered the orthodox version by subsequent Chinese philosophers, especially by the Neo-Confucians of the Song dynasty. Mencius's disciples included a large number of feudal lords, and he is said to have been more influential than Confucius had been.[16]

The Mencius is one of the Four Books that Zhu Xi (1130–1200) grouped as the core of orthodox Neo-Confucian thought. In contrast to the sayings of Confucius, which are short and self-contained, the Mencius consists of long dialogues, including arguments, with extensive prose. It was generally neglected by the Jesuit missionaries who first translated the Confucian canon into Latin and other European languages, as they felt that the Neo-Confucian school largely consisted of Buddhist and Taoist contamination of Confucianism. Matteo Ricci also particularly disliked what they had believed to be condemnation of celibacy as unfilial, which is rather a mistranslation of a similar word referring more to aspects of personality.[citation needed] François Noël, who felt that Zhu's ideas represented a natural and native development of Confucius's thought, was the first to publish a full edition of the Mencius at Prague in 1711[17] as the Chinese Rites controversy had been recently decided against the Jesuits; however, his edition attained little influence outside central and eastern Europe.

In a 1978 book that estimated the hundred most influential persons in history to that point, Mencius was ranked at 92.[18]

Mencius Institute[edit]

The first Mencius Institute was established in Xuzhou, China in 2008 under a collaboration between Jiangsu Normal University, China Zoucheng Heritage Tourism Bureau, and Xuzhou Mengshi Clan Friendship Network.[19]

First Mencius Institute outside of China is located at Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) Kampar Campus, Malaysia in 2016.[19]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Alternatively Mengzi, born Meng Ke.

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Mei, Yi Pao (1985). "Mencius", The New Encyclopedia Britannica, v. 8, p. 3.
  2. ^ Shun, Kwong Loi. "Mencius". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
  3. ^ Goldin, Paul R. (2018), "Xunzi", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2022-05-15
  4. ^ Chan 1963: 49.
  5. ^ Jaroslav Průšek and Zbigniew Słupski, eds., Dictionary of Oriental Literatures: East Asia (Charles Tuttle, 1978): 115-116.
  6. ^ 孟子林 Archived 2012-08-05 at archive.today (Mencius Cemetery)
  7. ^ The Mencius 7:A1 in Chan 1963: 78.
  8. ^ The Mencius 6:A11 in Chan 1963: 58.
  9. ^ The Mencius 2A:6 in Chan 1963: 65. Formatting has been applied to ease readability.
  10. ^ The Mencius 1B:8 in Chan 1963: 62.
  11. ^ Yagi, Kiichiro (2008). "China, economics in," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, v. 1, p. 778. Abstract.
  12. ^ Hart, Michael H. (1978), The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, p. 480.
  13. ^ a b Chen, Huanzhang (1911). The economic principles of Confucius and his school. Columbia University, Longmans, Green & Co., Agents; [etc., etc.] OCLC 492146426.
  14. ^ Estate, The Arthur Waley (2012-11-12). The Analects of Confucius. doi:10.4324/9780203715246. ISBN 9780203715246.
  15. ^ Martin, Michael R. (1990-02-01). "David L. Hall and Roger T. Ames, Thinking Through Confucius, State University of New York Press, 19137". Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 17 (4): 495–503. doi:10.1163/15406253-01704005. ISSN 0301-8121.
  16. ^ Charles O. Hucker, China to 1850: A Short History, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978, p. 45
  17. ^ Noël (1711).
  18. ^ Hart, Michael H. (1978), The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, p. 7, discussed on pp. 479–81.
  19. ^ a b "Proud addition to university". The Star.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]