Civilization

The word civilization (or civilisation) has a variety of meanings related to human society. The word "civilization" comes from the Latin word for townsman or citizen, civis, and its adjectival form, civilis. To be "civilized" essentially meant being a townsman, governed by the constitution and legal statutes of that community. Roman Civil Law was gathered together into a consolidated body of the “Code Civil” in the 6th Century for Emperor Justinian (483-565 CE). Justinian's code was rediscovered and used by law professors at the first University established in Western Europe, at Bologna in the 11th century. From 1388 the word “civil” appeared in English, while “civilization” as a “law which makes a criminal process civil”, appeared in 1704, closely followed in 1722 with “civilization” - meaning the opposite of “barbarity” and coming probably from the French language.

By the most minimal, literal definition, a civilization is a complex society. Technically, anthropologists distinguish civilizations in which many of the people live in cities and get their food from agriculture, from band and tribal societies in which people live in small settlements or nomadic groups and subsist by foraging, hunting, or working small horticultural gardens. When used in this sense, civilization is an exclusive term, applied to some human groups and not others.

In a broader sense, civilization often can refer to any distinct society, whether complex and city dwelling, or simple and tribal. This sense is often perceived as less exclusive and ethnocentric, or alternatively less useful and meaningful, than the first. In this sense, civilization is nearly synonymous with culture.

"Civilization" can sometimes refer to human society as a whole, as in "A nuclear war would wipe out Civilization" (see End of civilization) or "I'm glad to be safely back in Civilization after being lost in the wilderness for 3 weeks". Additionally, it is used in this sense to refer to the potential global civilization.

Civilization can also mean the standard of behavior, similar to etiquette. "Civilized" behavior is contrasted with "barbaric" or crude behavior. In this sense, civilization implies sophistication and refinement.

Another use of civilization combines the first and fourth meanings of the word, implying that a complex society is naturally superior to less complex societies. This point of view has been used to justify racism and imperialism; powerful societies have often believed it was their right to "civilize," or culturally dominate, weaker ones ("barbarians"). (The colonization or 'civilizing' of non-Western peoples was sometimes called the "White Man's Burden" when engaged in by Modern Europeans.) Alternatively, it can be said that most people choose to live in increasingly complex societies because of increased standards of living: one of the major population shifts of the last two hundred years has been the migration of people from outlying rural and undeveloped areas to cities.

This article will mainly treat civilizations in the first, narrow, sense. See culture, society, etiquette, and ethnocentrism and for topics related to the broader senses of the term. See also Problems with the term.

Morton Fried, a conflict theorist, and Elman Service, an integration theorist, have produced a system of classification for all human cultures and societies based on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state. This system of classification contains four categories:

• hunter-gatherer bands, which are generally egalitarian.
• tribal societies in which there are some limited instances of social rank and prestige.
• stratified structures led by chieftains.
• civilizations, with complex social hierarchies and organized, institutional governments.

File:Egyptianplow.jpg

Literally, a civilization is a complex society, as distinguished from a simpler society. Everyone lives in a society and a culture, but not everyone lives in a civilization. Historically, civilizations have shared some or all of the following traits (some of these were suggested by V. Gordon Childe):

• Intensive agricultural techniques, such as the use of human power, crop rotation, and irrigation. This has enabled farmers to produce a surplus of food that is not necessary for their own subsistence.
• A significant portion of the population that does not devote most of its time to producing food. This permits a division of labor. Those who do not occupy their time in producing food may instead focus their efforts in other fields, such as industry, war, science or religion. This is possible because of the food surplus described above.
• The gathering of some of these non-food producers into permanent settlements, called cities.
• A form of social organization. This can be a chiefdom, in which the chieftain of one noble family or clan rules the people; or a state society, in which the ruling class is supported by a government or bureaucracy. Political power is concentrated in the cities.
• The institutionalized control of food by the ruling class, government or bureaucracy.
• The establishment of complex, formal social institutions such as organized religion and education, as opposed to the less formal traditions of other societies.
• Development of complex forms of economic exchange. This includes the expansion of trade and may lead to the creation of money and markets.
• The accumulation of more material possessions than in simpler societies.
• Development of new technologies by people who are not busy producing food. In many early civilizations, metallurgy was an important advancement.
• Advanced development of the arts, including writing.

By this definition, some societies, like Greece, are clearly civilizations, whereas others like the Bushmen clearly are not. However, the distinction is not always clear. In the Pacific Northwest of the US, for example, an abundant supply of fish guaranteed that the people had a surplus of food without any agriculture. The people established permanent settlements, a social hierarchy, material wealth, and advanced artwork (most famously totem poles), all without the development of intensive agriculture. Meanwhile, the Pueblo culture of southwestern North America developed advanced agriculture, irrigation, and permanent, communal settlements such as Taos. However, the Pueblo never developed any of the complex institutions associated with civilizations. Today, many tribal societies live inside states and under their laws. The political structures of civilization have been superimposed on their way of life, so they too occupy a middle ground between tribal and civilized.

The evolution of most civilizations has been summarized as follows:

1. All civilizations start small, establishing their genesis with the creation of state systems for maintaining the elite.
2. Successful civilizations then flourish and grow, becoming larger and larger in an accelerating fashion.
3. They then reach a limiting maximum extent, perhaps managing to hold a degree of stability for a length of time.
4. Competition between states in a civilization may result in one achieving predominance over the others.
5. Dominance may be indirect, or may formalize into the structure of single multi-ethnic empires.
6. Over the long term civilizations either collapse or get replaced by a larger, more dynamic civilization.

"Civilization" can also describe the culture of a complex society, not just the society itself. Every society, civilization or not, has a specific set of ideas and customs, and a certain set of items and arts, that make it unique. Civilizations have even more intricate cultures, including literature, professional art, architecture, organized religion, and complex customs associated with the elite. Civilization is such in nature that it seeks to spread, to have more, to expand, and it has the means by which to do this.

Nevertheless, some tribes or peoples remained uncivilized even to this day (2006). These cultures are called primitive. They do not have hierarchical governments, organized religion, writing systems or money. The little hierarchy that exists, for example respect for the elderly, is mutual and not instituted by force, rather by a sort of mutual agreement. Government does not exist, or at least the civilized version of government which most of us are familiar with.

The civilized world is spread by introducing agriculture, writing and religion to primitive tribes. Some tribes may willingly adapt to civilized behavior. But civilization is also spread by force: if a tribe does not wish to use agriculture or accept a certain religion it is often forced to do so by the civilized people, and they usually succeed due to their more advanced technology. Civilization often uses religion to justify its actions, claiming for example that the uncivilized are savages, barbarians or the like, which should be subjugated by civilization.

It is difficult for the uncivilized world to mount any counter-assault on civilization since that would mean complying to civilization's standards and concepts of advanced violence (war). They would need to become civilized in order to engage in any sort of war.

Thus, the intricate culture associated with civilization has a tendency to spread to and influence other cultures, sometimes assimilating them into the civilization (a classic example being Chinese civilization and its influence on Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and so forth). Many civilizations are actually large cultural spheres containing many nations and regions. The civilization in which someone lives is that person's broadest cultural identity. A female of African descent living in the United States has many roles that she identifies with. However, she is above all a member of "Western civilization". In the same way, a male of Kurdish ancestry living in Iran is above all a member of "Persian civilization".

Many historians have focused on these broad cultural spheres and have treated civilizations as single units. One example is early twentieth-century philosopher Oswald Spengler, even though he uses the German word "Kultur", "culture", for what we here call a "civilization". He said that a civilization's coherence is based around a single primary cultural symbol. Civilizations experience cycles of birth, life, decline and death, often supplanted by a new civilization with a potent new culture, formed around a compelling new cultural symbol.

This "unified culture" concept of civilization also influenced the theories of historian Arnold J. Toynbee in the mid-twentieth century. Toynbee explored civilization processes in his multi-volume A Study of History, which traced the rise and, in most cases, the decline of 21 civilizations and five "arrested civilizations". Civilizations generally declined and fell, according to Toynbee, because of moral or religious decline, rather than economic or environmental causes.

Samuel P. Huntington similarly defines a civilization as "the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have short of that which distinguishes humans from other species." Besides giving a definition of a civilization, Huntington has also proposed several theories about civilizations, discussed below.

Another group of theorists, making use of systems theory, look at civilizations as complex systems or networks of cities that emerge from pre-urban cultures, and are defined by the economic, political, military, diplomatic, and cultural interactions between them.

For example, urbanist Jane Jacobs defines cities as the economic engines that work to create large networks of people. The main process that creates these city networks, she says, is "import replacement". Import replacement is the process by which peripheral cities begin to replace goods and services that were formerly imported from more advanced cities. Successful import replacement creates economic growth in these peripheral cities, and allows these cities to then export their goods to less developed cities in their own hinterlands, creating new economic networks. So Jacobs explores economic development across wide networks instead of treating each society as an isolated cultural sphere.

Systems theorists look at many types of relations between cities, including economic relations, cultural exchanges, and political/diplomatic/military relations. These spheres often occur on different scales. For example, trade networks were, until the nineteenth century, much larger than either cultural spheres or political spheres. Extensive trade routes, including the silk road through Central Asia and Indian Ocean sea routes linking the Roman Empire, Persia, India, and China, were well established 2000 years ago, when these civilizations scarcely shared any political, diplomatic, military, or cultural relations.

Many theorists argue that the entire world has already become integrated into a single "world system," a process known as globalization. Different civilizations and societies all over the globe are economically, politically, and even culturally interdependent in many ways. There is debate over when this integration began, and what sort of integration - cultural, technological, economic, political, or military-diplomatic - is the key indicator in determining the extent of a civilization. David Wilkinson has proposed that economic and military-diplomatic integration of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations resulted in the creation of what he calls the "Central Civilization" around 1500 BCE. Central Civilization later expanded to include the entire Middle East and Europe, and then expanded to a global scale with European colonization, integrating the Americas, Australia, China and Japan by the nineteenth century. According to Wilkinson, civilizations can be culturally heterogeneous, like the Central Civilization, or relatively homogeneous, like the Japanese civilization. What Huntington calls the "clash of civilizations" might be characterized by Wilkinson as a clash of cultural spheres within a single global civilization. Others point to the Crusades as the first step in globalization. The more conventional viewpoint is that networks of societies have expanded and shrunk since ancient times, and that the current globalized economy and culture is a product of recent European colonialism.

Political scientist Samuel P. Huntington has argued that the defining characteristic of the 21st century will be a clash of civilizations. According to Huntington, conflicts between civilizations will supplant the conflicts between nation-states and ideologies that characterized the 19th and 20th centuries.

Currently, world civilization is in a stage that has created what may be characterized as an industrial society, superseding the agrarian society that preceded it. Some futurists believe that civilization is undergoing another transformation, and that world society will become an informational society.

Historian William McGaughey, for instance, interprets world history in terms of five civilizations which have appeared in succession, each introduced by a new communication technology. Civilization itself began with writing in an ideographic form. Alphabetic writing, printing, electronic recording and broadcasting, and computer communication have introduced the remaining four civilizations, the last being in its infancy. The future of this civilization depends on organic processes similar to those in earlier ones. To a certain degree, we are able to predict the future by reviewing the course of past civilizations. Computer-based communication will shape the future of global society.

The Kardashev scale classifies civilizations based on their level of technological advancement, specifically measured by the amount of energy a civilization is able to harness. The Kardashev scale makes provisions for civilizations far more technologically advanced than any currently known to exist. (see also: Civilizations and the Future, Space civilization)

There have been many explanations put forwards for the collapse of civilization.

Edward Gibbon's massive work "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" began an interest in the Fall of Civilizations, that had begun with the historical divisions of Petrarch[1] between the Classical period of Ancient Greece and Rome, the succeeding Medieval Ages, and the Renaissance. For Gibbon:-

"The decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the cause of the destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest; and, as soon as time or accident and removed the artificial supports, the stupendous fabric yielded to the pressure of its own weight. The story of the ruin is simple and obvious: and instead of inquiring why the Roman Empire was destroyed we should rather be surprised that it has subsisted for so long."[Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 2nd ed., vol. 4, ed. by J. B. Bury (London, 1909), pp. 173-174.] Gibbon suggested the final act of the collapse of Rome was the collapse of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453 AD.

Theodor Mommsen in his "History of Rome", suggested Rome collapsed with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD and he also tended towards a biological analogy of "genesis", "growth", "senescence", "collapse" and "decay".

Oswald Spengler, in his "Decline of the West" rejected Petrarch's chronological division, and suggested that there had been only eight "mature civilizations". Growing cultures he argued tend to develop into imperialistic civilizations which expand and ultimately collapse, with democratic forms of government ushering in plutocracy and ultimately imperialism.

Arnold Toynbee in his monumental "A Study of History" suggested that there had been a much larger number of civilizations, including a small number of arrested civilizations, and that all civilizations tended to go through the cycle identified by Mommsen. The cause of the fall of a civilization occurred when a cultural elite became a parasitic elite, leading to the rise of internal and external proletariat.

Joseph Tainter in "The Decline of Complex Societies" suggested that there was a diminishing return to complexity, in which as states achieved a maximum permissible complexity, would decline when further increases actually produced a negative return. Tainter suggested that Rome achieved this figure in the 2nd Century AD.

Jared Diamond in his recent book "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed" suggests five major reasons for the collapse of 41 studied cultures.

• Environmental damage, such as deforestation and soil erosion
• Climate change
• Dependence upon long-distance trade for needed resources
• Increasing and rising levels of internal and external violence, such as war or invasion
• Societal responses to internal and environmental problems

Generally explanations for the collapse of civilization have shifted from inherent biological analogies to more systemic ecological understandings where sustainable cultures fail to be built.

Civilization has been criticized from a variety of viewpoints and for a variety of reasons. However, few critics have objected to all aspects of civilization; rather, most have argued that civilization brings a mixture of good and bad effects.

The best known opponents of civilization are people who have voluntarily chosen to live outside it. These include hermits and religious ascetics who, in many different times and places, have attempted to eliminate the influence of civilization over their lives in order to concentrate on spiritual matters. Monasteries represent an effort by these ascetics to create a life somewhat apart from their mainstream civilizations. In the 19th century, Transcendentalists believed civilization was shallow and materialistic, so they wanted to build a completely agrarian society, free from the oppression of the city.

Civilizations have shown an inclination towards conquest and expansion. When civilizations were formed, more food was produced and the society's material possessions increased, but wealth also became concentrated in the hands of the powerful. The communal way of life among tribal people gave way to aristocracy and hierarchy. As hierarchies are able to generate sufficient resources and food surpluses capable of supplying standing armies, civilizations were capable of conquering neighboring cultures that made their livings in different ways. In this manner, civilizations began to spread outward from Eurasia across the world some 10,000 years ago - and are finishing the job today in the remote jungles of the Amazon and New Guinea.

Many environmentalists criticize civilizations for their exploitation of the environment. Through intensive agriculture and urban growth, civilizations tend to destroy natural settings and habitats. This is sometimes referred to as "dominator culture". Proponents of this view believe that traditional societies live in greater harmony with nature than civilizations; people work with nature rather than try to subdue it. The sustainable living movement is a push from some members of civilization to regain that harmony with nature.

Primitivism is a modern philosophy totally opposed to civilization. Primitivists accuse civilizations of restricting human potential, oppressing the weak, and damaging the environment. They wish to return to a more primitive way of life which they consider to be in the best interests of both nature and human beings. A leading proponent is John Zerzan, whereas a critic is Roger Sandall.

However, not all critics of past and present civilization believe that a primitive way of life is better. Some have argued that a third alternative exists, which is neither primitive nor "civilized" in the current sense of the word. This may be described as a radically different form of civilization. Karl Marx, for instance, argued that the beginning of civilization was the beginning of oppression and exploitation, but also believed that these things would eventually be overcome and communism would be established throughout the world. He envisioned communism not as a return to any sort of idyllic past, but as a quantum leap forward to a new stage of civilization. Conflict theory in the social sciences also views present civilization as being based on the domination of some people by others, but makes no moral judgments on the issue.

Among Eastern schools of thought, Taoism was one of the first to reject the Confucian concern for civilization.

As discussed above, "civilization" has a number of meanings, and its use can lead to confusion and misunderstanding.

However, "civilization" can be a highly connotative word. It might bring to mind qualities such as superiority, humaneness, and refinement. Indeed, many members of civilized societies have seen themselves as superior to the "barbarians" outside their civilization.

Many 19th-century anthropologists backed a theory called cultural evolution. They believed that people naturally progress from a simple state to a superior, civilized state. John Wesley Powell, for example, classified all societies as Savage, Barbarian, and Civilized; the first two of his terms would shock most anthropologists today. The early 20th century saw the first cracks in this world view within Western Civilization: Joseph Conrad's 1902 novel "Heart of Darkness", for example, told a story set in the Congo Free State, in which the most savage and uncivilized behavior was initiated by a white European. This hierarchical world view was dealt further serious blows by the atrocities of World War I and World War II and so on.

Today most social scientists believe at least to some extent in cultural relativism, the view that complex societies are not by nature superior, more humane, or more sophisticated than less complex or technologically advanced groups. This view has its roots in the writings of Franz Boas.

A minority of scholars reject the relativism of Boas and mainstream social science. English biologist John Baker, in his 1974 book Race, gives about 20 criteria that make civilizations superior to non-civilizations. Baker tries to show a relation between the cultures of civilizations and the biological disposition of their creators.

Many postmodernists, and a considerable proportion of the wider public, argue that the division of societies into 'civilized' and 'uncivilized' is arbitrary and meaningless. On a fundamental level, they say there is no difference between civilizations and tribal societies; that each simply does what it can with the resources it has. In this view, the concept of "civilization" has merely been the justification for colonialism, imperialism, genocide, and coercive acculturation.

On the other hand, critics of this view argue that there are real differences between civilizations and tribal or hunter-gatherer societies. The modes of social organization, they say, are fundamentally altered in complex, urban societies that gather large amounts of unrelated people together into cities. Additionally, it is argued that the complex division of labor and specialized economic activities that characterize civilizations produce better standards of living for their inhabitants.

For all of the above reasons, many scholars today avoid using the term "civilization" as a stand-alone term; they prefer to use urban society or intensive agricultural society, which are much less ambiguous, more neutral-sounding terms. "Civilization" however remains in common academic use when describing specific societies, such as "Mayan Civilization".

The earliest known civilizations (as defined in the traditional sense) arose in Mesopotamia between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in modern-day Iraq, the Nile valley of Egypt, the Indus Valley region of modern-day Pakistan and North India, and the parallel development of Chinese civilizations in the Huang He (Yellow River) and Yangtze River valleys of China, while smaller civilizations arose in Elam in modern-day Iran, and on the island of Crete in the Aegean Sea, as well as the Olmec civilization in present-day Mexico. The inhabitants of these areas built cities, created writing systems, learned to make pottery and use metals, domesticated animals, and created complex social structures with class systems.

The Mesopotamian civilization of Sumer officially began at around 4000-3500 BCE, and ended at 2334 BCE with the rise of Assyria. It was the world's first civilization. The oldest granary yet found dates back to 9500 BCE and is located in the Jordan Valley. The earliest known settlement in Jericho (9th millennium BCE) in modern-day Israel, was a PPNA culture that eventually gave way to more developed settlements later, which included in one early settlement (8th millennium BCE) mud-brick houses surrounded by a stone wall, having a stone tower built into the wall. In this time there is evidence of domesticated emmer wheat, barley and pulses and hunting of wild animals. However, there are no indications of attempts to form communities (early civilizations) with surrounding peoples. Nevertheless, by the 6th millennium BCE we find what appears to be an ancient shrine and cult, which would likely indicate intercommunal religious practices in this era. Findings include a collective burial (with not all the skeletons completely articulated, jaws removed, faces covered with plaster, cowries used for eyes). Other finds from this era include stone and bone tools, clay figurines and shell and malachite beads. Around 1500 to 1200 BCE Jericho and other cities of Canaan had become vassals of the Egyptian empire.

Several miles southwest of Ur, Eridu was the southernmost of a conglomeration of early temple-cities, in Sumer, southern Mesopotamia, with the earliest of these settlements carbon dating to around 5000 BCE. The Sialk ziggurat of Kashan, Iran, also dates to this era. By the 4th millennium BCE, in Nippur we find, in connection with a sort of ziggurat and shrine, a conduit built of bricks, in the form of an arch. Sumerian inscriptions written on clay also appear in Nippur. By 4000 BCE an ancient city of Susa, in Mesopotamia, seems to emerge from earlier villages. Sumerian cuneiform script dates to no later than about 3500 BCE. Sumer, which was Mesopotamia's first civilization in what is now Iraq, is recognized as the world's earliest civilization. Other villages begin to spring up around this time in the Ancient Near East (Middle East) as well.

The Egyptian civilization of the Nile Valley began at around 3200 BCE, and ended at around 80 BCE when Augustus conquered the Nile Valley. It is one of the three oldest civilizations in the world. Anthropological and archaeological evidence both indicate a grain-grinding culture farming along the Nile in the 10th millennium BC using sickle blades. But another culture of hunters, fishers and gathering peoples using stone tools replaced them. Evidence also indicates human habitation in the southwestern corner of Egypt, near the Sudan border, before 8000 BC. Climate changes and/or overgrazing around 8000 BC began to desiccate the pastoral lands of Egypt, eventually forming the Sahara (c.2500 BC), and early tribes naturally migrated to the Nile river where they developed a settled agricultural economy and more centralized society. Domesticated animals had already been imported from Asia between 7500 BC and 4000 BC (see Sahara: History, Cattle period), and there is evidence of pastoralism and cultivation of cereals in the East Sahara in the 7th millennium BC. The earliest known artwork of ships in ancient Egypt dates to 6000 BCE.

By 6000 BC predynastic Egyptians in the southwestern corner of Egypt were herding cattle and constructing large buildings. Symbols on Gerzean pottery, c.4000 BC, resemble traditional hieroglyph writing [2]. In ancient Egypt mortar (masonry) was in use by 4000 BC, and ancient Egyptians were producing ceramic faience as early as 3500 BC. There is evidence that ancient Egyptian explorers may have originally cleared and protected some branches of the Silk Road. Medical institutions are known to have been established in Egypt since as early as circa 3000 BC. ancient Egypt gains credit for the tallest ancient pyramids and early forms of surgery, mathematics, and barge transport (see ancient Egypt: Ancient Achievements).

The Indus Valley civilization began in the 33rd century BCE at Harappa, followed by Mohenjo-Daro a few centuries later. By 2800 BCE, it had developed into the largest and most advanced civilization of its time, covering almost all of Pakistan and much of northern India. The earliest-known farming cultures in South Asia emerged in the hills of Balochistan, Pakistan, which included Mehrgarh in 7000 BCE. These semi-nomadic peoples domesticated wheat, barley, sheep, goat and cattle. Pottery was in use by the 6th millennium BC. The oldest granary yet found in Mehrgarh in the Indus Valley dates from 6000 BC. Their settlement consisted of mud buildings that housed four internal subdivisions. Burials included elaborate goods such as baskets, stone and bone tools, beads, bangles, pendants and occasionally animal sacrifices. Figurines and ornaments of sea shell, limestone, turquoise, lapis lazuli, sandstone and polished copper have been found. By the 4th millennium BCE we find much evidence of manufacturing. Technologies included stone and copper drills, updraft kilns, large pit kilns and copper melting crucibles. Button seals included geometric designs.

By 4000 BCE, a pre-Harappan culture emerged, with trade networks including lapis lazuli and other raw materials. Villagers domesticated numerous other crops, including peas, sesame seed, dates, and cotton, plus a wide range of domestic animals, including the water buffalo which still remains essential to intensive agricultural production throughout Asia today. There is also evidence of sea-going craft. Archaeologists have discovered a massive, dredged canal and docking facility at the coastal city of Lothal, India, perhaps the world's oldest sea-faring harbor. Judging from the dispersal of artifacts the trade networks integrated portions of Afghanistan, the Persian coast, northern and central India, Mesopotamia (see Meluhha) and Ancient Egypt (see Silk Road).

Archaeologists studying the remains of two men from Mehrgarh, Pakistan, discovered that these peoples in the Indus Valley Civilization had knowledge of medicine and dentistry as early as circa 3300 BC. Recently there was found dentistry as early as 7000 BC ( see http://archaeology.about.com/od/inventions/qt/dentistry.htm). The Indus Valley Civilization gains credit for the earliest known use of decimal fractions in a uniform system of ancient weights and measures, as well as negative numbers (see Timeline of mathematics). Ancient Indus Valley artifacts include beautiful, glazed stone faïence beads.

The Indus Valley Civilization boasts the earliest known accounts of urban planning. Major cities included Lothal (2400 BCE), Harappa (3300 BCE), and Mohenjo-Daro (2500 BCE) As seen in Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and (recently discovered) Rakhigarhi, Dholavira, India, their urban planning included the world's first urban sanitation systems. Evidence suggests efficient municipal governments. Streets were laid out in perfect grid patterns comparable to modern New York City. Houses were protected from noise, odors and thieves. The sewage and drainage systems developed and used in cities throughout the Indus Valley were far more advanced than that of contemporary urban sites in Mesopotamia and Egypt and also more advanced than that of any other Bronze Age or even Iron Age civilization. For an unknown reason, the Harappan civilization came to an end at around 1700 BCE.

Some historians, however, believe in an ancient civilization in present-day Gujarat known as the Sorath civilization, dating back to 3700 BCE. This view is starting to gain credence among historians, but has not yet been verified. This civilization was completely different from the Harappan civilization, with 90% different pottery, different crops, and a rural rather that urban aspect.

Another earlier claim was presented by oceanographical researchers of an Indian institution called NIOT in the Gulf of Cambay which consists in possible underwater structures resembling Harappan ones but dated about 7000 BC.

The Elamite Kingdom is one of the oldest civilizations on record, beginning around 2700 BCE and discovered and acknowledged very recently. This civilization was a hub of activity in the Middle East and would probably have been in contact with the civilizations of Sumer. There is evidence of an even older civilization called the Jiroft Kingdom, but not everybody acknowledges this civilization. There are records of numerous ancient and technologically advanced civilizations on the Iranian plateau before the arrival of Aryan tribes from the north, many of whom are still unknown to historians today. Archeological findings place knowledge of Persian prehistory at middle paleolithic times (100,000 years ago).[3] The earliest sedentary cultures date from 18,000-14,000 years ago. In 6000 BC the world saw a fairly sophisticated agricultural society and proto-urban population centers. 7000 year old jars of wine excavated in the Zagros Mountains (now on display at The University of Pennsylvania) and ruins of 7000 year old settlements such as Sialk are further testament to this. Many a dynasty have ruled Persia throughout the ages. Scholars and archeologists are only beginning to discover the scope of the independent, non-Semitic Elamite Empire and Jiroft civilizations (2) 5000 years ago. At the end of second millennium, the Aryan nomads from central Asia settled in Persia.

According to ancient dialects, the Huang He was irrigated at around 2200 BCE by an emperor named Yu the Great, starting the supposed Xia Dynasty. It is not known if this dynasty ever existed, but the earliest verifiable dynasty, the Shang Dynasty, emerged around 1750 BCE. Developed agriculture appears in the 7th millennium BC in the Peiligang culture (discovered in 1977) of Henan, China, including storing and redistributing crops, millet farming and animal husbandry (pigs). Evidence also indicates specialized craftsmenship and administrators (see History of China: Prehistoric times). This culture is one of the oldest in ancient China to show evidence of pottery-making. China's first historical dynasty, the Xia Dynasty, emerged in 2033 BC and may have been a late Neolithic or early Bronze Age culture.

Attributed to a later Chinese culture, in the Shang Dynasty (1600-1046 BC), are bronze artifacts and oracle bones, which were turtle shells or cattle scapula on which are written the first recorded Chinese characters and found in the Huang He valley, Yinxu (a capital of the Shang Dynasty). One of the few innovations to reach China from the outside world was the chariot, introduced at around 1300 BCE. The Shang Dynasty collapsed when western Chinese led a rebellion and started the Zhou Dynasty, which marked the end of the original civilization.

Another source of ancient chinese civilisation is Sanxingdui, which demonstrated astonishing bronze craftwork,but suddenly dispeared aroud 1000BC leaving no historic records.1

The first signs of civilization in Greece was on the island of Crete from around 2600 BCE, and by 2000 BCE, it had risen to become a large civilization across much of Greece. Aegean civilization is the general term for the prehistoric civilizations in Greece, mostly throughout the Aegean Sea. It was formerly called "Mycenaean" because its existence was first brought to popular notice by Heinrich Schliemann's excavations at Mycenae starting in 1876. It is more usual now to use the more general geographical title. The Mycenaean civilization is now known to have succeeded the earlier Minoan, flourished in the Greek island of Crete, for which the most representative site explored up to now is Cnossus. The site of Cnossus has yielded valuable and the most various and continuous evidence from the Neolithic age to the twilight of classical civilization. Human habitation on the site, began with the founding of the first Neolithic settlement in ca 7000 BC. Remains of food producing societies in Greece have also been found at the Franchthi Cave, and a number of sites in Thessaly, carbon-dated to ca 6500 BC. The list of significant archeological site's include the Akrotiri at the island of Thera. The oldest signs of human settlement in Thera are Late Neolithic (4th millennium BC or earlier), but since ca. 2000–1650 BC Akrotiri developed into one of the Aegean's major Bronze Age ports [4], with recovered objects that had come not just from Crete but also from Anatolia, Cyprus, Syria and Egypt, from the Dodecanese islands and the Greek mainland.

The language of the Minoans may have been written in the Cretan hieroglyphs and the Linear A script, but both remain undeciphered. Approximately 3,000 tablets bearing the writing have been discovered so far, many apparently being inventories of goods or resources. In the Mycenean period, Linear A was replaced by Linear B. The later was successfully undeciphered by Michael Ventris in the 1950s, proven to be a very archaic version of the Greek language.

Regarding the Aegean art many items have been excavated. One Aegean sculpture (a face figure), has been greately popularized due to its appearance in the Athens 2004 opening ceremony. Another one was the idea behind the game's mascots. Aegean figures are intriguing, since they show a high resemblance with modern sculptures (e.g. in Henry Moore's works).

The Olmec civilization was the first New World civilization, beginning at around 1200 BCE and ending at around 400 BCE. By 2700 BCE, settlers in the Americas had begun to grow their first crop, maize, and a number of cities were built. Around 1200 BCE, these small cities coalesced into this civilization. A prominent civilization thus emerged. The centers of these cities were ceremonial complexes with pyramids and walled plazas. The first of these centers was at San Lorenzo, with another one following it at La Venta. Olmec artisans sculpted jade and clay figurines of Jaguars and humans, and giant heads of the emperor were standing at every major city. Strangely enough, this civilization was much younger and less advanced that its much older counterparts in Eurasia, where farming started around 8000 BCE. The ruling families, however, eventually lost their grip on the surrounding regions, and the civilization ended in 400 BCE, with the defacing and destruction of San Lorenzo and La Venta, two of the major cities. This civilization paved the way for later New World empires and societes such as the Maya and Aztec, which originated thousands of years later.

Socialists had a dual attitude towards civilization.

A positive view of civilization was that they wanted to make everybody civilized. Workers needed to civilize themselves by learning to read and write. They needed to read literature, go to theater and become modern atheistic citizens.

A negative view of civilization was the belief that society and state would wither away. Class struggle, difference between men and women, parliament, school, authority, state would all disappear and be replaced by the socialist society during a worldrevolution.

There was a strong belief among socialists of all kinds that a world revolution was very near. They just needed to wait. In 1872, a major breach occurred between anarchists and marxists. Marxists believed that the revolution needed a strict organization with only one ideology. Anarchists accepted pluriformity of ideas. Revisionism tried to make an end to the marxist dogmas by emphasizing on the lack individualism in the collective ideology. Still, all three kinds of ideologies believed that a revolution was near.

The Soviet Union was the first socialist state, which theoretically wanted to civilize all peoples and which wanted to quicken the pace of the fall of capitalist society.

A cultural revolution in the 1920s and early 1930s met with little succes. The policy of collectivisation was aimed at destroying the peasant culture. A large scale industrialization project was a strictly organized in theory, but a was largely chaotic in reality. The population witnessed large scale mass murder, destruction of churches and mosques, separating families (considered a bourgeois institute), ending school discipline and very poor living conditions (millions died of hunger and families lived in overcrowded flats with shared kitchens). Many Christian peasants believed that the Apocalypse had started and remained Christian. Muslim peasants started holy wars which were impossible to win. The separation of families led to 'hooliganism': gangs of youth were uncontrollable, many people became alcoholics, and apathy among workers led to low production.

In the middle of the 1930s, the Communist policy was adjusted to more traditional methods. Income differences were reinstated. Discipline became important again at school and in factories. Family values were praised by the State-run media and propaganda outlets. Religion was tacitly allowed and the Church was incorporated in the state. Nationalism was reintroduced, especially during World War 2. The withering away of society in this view had failed.

In the meanwhile, socialists were losing faith in the revolution in many western countries. Social democratic labour parties became protectors of democracy and peace and wanted to cooperate with 'bourgeois' political parties to build up the welfare state. They became advocates of solidarity within a capitalist society. Communist parties and anarchists were strong opposers of the social democrats.

Youth culture and socialism became intermingled in the 1960s and 1970s. Many believed that the enormous wealth of the economic growth wasn't helping humanity very well. They wanted an political emphasis on welfare instead of wealth. Peace and equal sharing became more important then they used to be. Attempts were made to make an end to rascism and laissez faire capitalism. The opposition against this youth culture was strong. Some anarchists and communists became left-wing terrorists who killed many people. The atricities of the Soviet Union and communist China became public knowledge in the 1970s. This lead to a great deception. The young people of the 1960s started families and made careers. Materialism replaced their socialist ideals.

The ideal of civilising collapsed. The dominant ideology became that no culture is better then the other. Mass popular culture pushed away elite culture.

Socialists lost faith in the ideal of the worldrevolution, while the ideal of civlizing was gone as well. They became the main advocates of the welfare state.

Neoliberalism has become the dominant ideology in the world. Anti-globalists try to do their best to end the dominance of the market orientated ideology. Overpopulation is threatening the human wealth and welfare in the meanwhile.

• End of civilization
• List of pre-Columbian civilizations
• Dystopia
• Utopia
• Kardashev scale

• BBC on civilization
• Wiktionary: civilization, civilize
  
  
• Brinton, Crane ; et al. (1984). A History of Civilization: Prehistory to 1715 (6th ed. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0133898660. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
• Casson, Lionel (1994). Ships and Seafaring in Ancient Times. London: British Museum Press. ISBN 0714117358.
• Chisholm, Jane (1991). Early Civilization. illus. Ian Jackson. London: Usborne. ISBN 1580860222. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
• Collcutt, Martin (1988). Cultural Atlas of Japan. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0816019274. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
• Drews, Robert (1993). The End of the Bronze Age: Changes in Warfare and the Catastrophe ca. 1200 B.C. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691048118.
• Edey, Maitland A. (1974). The Sea Traders. New York: Time-Life Books. ISBN 0705400603.
• Fairservis, Walter A., Jr. (1975). The Threshold of Civilization: An Experiment in Prehistory. New York: Scribner. ISBN 068412775X.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Fernández-Armesto, Felipe (2000). Civilizations. London: Macmillan. ISBN 0333901711.
• Ferrill, Arther (1985). The Origins of War: From the Stone Age to Alexander the Great. New York: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0500250936.
• Fitzgerald, C. P. (1969). The Horizon History of China. New York: American Heritage. ISBN 0828100055.
• Fuller, J. F. C. (1954–57). A Military History of the Western World. 3 vols. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  1. From the Earliest Times to the Battle of Lepanto. ISBN 0306803046 (1987 reprint).
  2. From the Defeat of the Spanish Armada to the Battle of Waterloo. ISBN 0306803054 (1987 reprint).
  3. From the American Civil War to the End of World War II. ISBN 0306803062 (1987 reprint).
• Gowlett, John (1984). Ascent to Civilization. London: Collins. ISBN 0002170906.
• Hawkes, Jacquetta (1968). Dawn of the Gods. London: Chatto & Windus. ISBN 0701113324.
• Hawkes, Jacquetta (1976). The Atlas of Early Man. London: Dorling Kindersley. ISBN 0312097468 (1993 reprint). {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
• Hicks, Jim (1974). The Empire Builders. New York: Time-Life Books.
• Hicks, Jim (1975). The Persians. New York: Time-Life Books.
• Johnson, Paul (1987). A History of the Jews. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 0297790919.
• Keppie, Lawrence (1984). The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble. ISBN 0389204471.
• Lansing, Elizabeth (1971). The Sumerians: Inventors and Builders. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0070363579.
• Lee, Ki-Baik (1984). A New History of Korea. trans. Edward W. Wagner, with Edward J. Shultz. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674615751.
• McGaughey, William (2000). Five Epochs of Civilization: World History as Emerging in Five Civilizations. Minneapolis: Thistlerose. ISBN 0960563032.
• Nahm, Andrew C. (1983). A Panorama of 5000 Years: Korean History. Elizabeth, N.J.: Hollym International. ISBN 093087823X.
• Oliphant, Margaret (1992). The Atlas of the Ancient World: Charting the Great Civilizations of the Past. London: Ebury. ISBN 0091770408.
• Rogerson, John (1985). Atlas of the Bible. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0816012067.
• Sandall, Roger (2001). The Culture Cult: Designer Tribalism and Other Essays. Boulder, Colo.: Westview. ISBN 0813338638.
• Sansom, George (1958). A History of Japan: To 1334. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0804705232 (1996 reprint).
• Southworth, John Van Duyn (1968). The Ancient Fleets: The Story of Naval Warfare Under Oars, 2600 B.C.–1597 A.D. New York: Twayne.
• Thomas, Hugh (1981). An Unfinished History of the World (rev. ed. ed.). London: Pan. ISBN 0330264583. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
• Yap, Yong (1975). The Early Civilization of China. New York: Putnam. ISBN 0399115951. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)