Jump to content

Rhombic antenna: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:


==Advantages of Rhombic Antennas ==
==Advantages of Rhombic Antennas ==
[[File:Radio Antenna Engineering-Fig3-77.png|300px|right|A horizontal rhombic antenna]]
[[File:Radio Antenna Engineering-Fig3-77.png|300px|right|A horizontal rhombic antenna]]
* Its input impedance & radiation pattern are relatively constant over a 2:1 range of frequencies. Its impedance can be made relatively constant over a frequency range 4:1 or more, with the forward gain increasing at 6 dB per octave.
* Its input impedance & radiation pattern are relatively constant over a 2:1 range of frequencies. Its impedance can be made relatively constant over a frequency range 4:1 or more, with the forward gain increasing at 6 dB per octave.
* Multiple rhombic antennas can be connected in an end-to-end fashion to form MUSA (Multiple Unit Steerable Antenna). MUSA arrays can receive long distance, short wave, horizontally polarized down coming waves.
* Multiple rhombic antennas can be connected in an end-to-end fashion to form MUSA (Multiple Unit Steerable Antenna). MUSA arrays can receive long distance, short wave, horizontally polarized down coming waves.

Revision as of 18:52, 12 November 2009

File:Antenna boom comparison.png
Rhombic antenna signal-gathering action compared to other end-fire, backfire and traveling-wave types.

A rhombic antenna is a broadband directional antenna co-invented by Edmond Bruce and Harald Friis,[1] mostly commonly used in HF (high frequency, also called shortwave) ranges.

Technical Detail

It is named after its "rhombic" diamond shape, with each side typically at least one wavelength (λ) or longer in length. Each vertex is supported by a pole, typically at least one wavelength high. It is typically fed at one of the two sharper angles through a balanced transmission line. Less commonly, it can be fed with coaxial cable through a balun transformer. The opposite end is either left open for bi-directional use, or terminated at the opposite sharp angle with a non-inductive resistor. It is directional towards the resistor end, so the termination end points towards the region of the world it is designed to serve. Even when unterminated (bi-directional) the rhombic is not perfectly bi-directional. This is because of losses in the system primarily caused by radiation, conductor resistance, and coupling to the lossy soil below the antenna.

The rhombic antenna can radiate at elevation angles close to the horizon or at higher angles depending on its height above ground relative to the operating frequency and its physical construction. Likewise, its beam can be narrow or broad, depending primarily on its length. A proper combination of size, height, and operating frequency make it fit for medium or long range communication.

A rhombic requires a large area of land—especially if several antennas are installed to serve a variety of geographic regions at different distances or directions or to cover widely different frequencies. The rhombic suffers from efficiency problems due to earth losses below the antenna, significant power-wasting spurious lobes, termination losses, and the inability to maintain constant current along the length of the conductors. Typical radiation efficiency is in the order of 40-50%. The low efficiency significantly reduces gain for a given main lobe beamwidth when compared to other arrays of the same beamwidth.[2]

At the expense of system simplicity, it is possible to improve efficiency by recirculation of power wasted in the termination resistance of unidirectional rhombics. Use of a recirculating termination system can move efficiency into the 70-80% range by combining power that would have been wasted in the termination with the transmitter power. Such systems bring a low-loss balanced line back from the termination end to the feedpoint through a matching and phasing system. Energy that would otherwise dissipated in the termination resistance is applied in-phase with the excitation.

Prior to WWII, the rhombic was one of the most popular point-to-point high frequency antenna arrays. After WWII the rhombic largely fell out of favor for shortwave broadcast and point-to-point communications work, being replaced by log periodics and curtain arrays. Larger log periodics provide wider frequency coverage with comparable gain to rhombics. Distributed feed curtains or HRS curtain arrays provided a cleaner pattern, ability to steer the pattern in elevation and azimuth, much higher efficiency, and significantly higher gain in less space.

On the other hand, the rhombic remains one of the least complex medium-gain options for sustained long distance communications over point-to-point circuits. Rhombics also handle considerable transmitter power, since they have essentially uniform voltage and current distribution. The rhombic's low cost, simplicity, reliability, and ease of construction sometimes outweighs performance advantages offered by other more complex arrays.[3][4][5]

Advantages of Rhombic Antennas

A horizontal rhombic antenna
  • Its input impedance & radiation pattern are relatively constant over a 2:1 range of frequencies. Its impedance can be made relatively constant over a frequency range 4:1 or more, with the forward gain increasing at 6 dB per octave.
  • Multiple rhombic antennas can be connected in an end-to-end fashion to form MUSA (Multiple Unit Steerable Antenna). MUSA arrays can receive long distance, short wave, horizontally polarized down coming waves.
  • These can be modelled to offer up to 120 dB of directivity.

Patents

References

  1. ^ Harald T. Friis at IEEE GHN.org http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Harald_T._Friis
  2. ^ Antennas and Transmission Lines, J. Kuecken
  3. ^ Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems, Jordon-Balmain,Prentice-Hall EE Series,2nd edition
  4. ^ Antennas,J. Kraus, McGraw-Hill EE series, pgs 408-412
  5. ^ Radio Antenna Engineering, E.A, Laport, McGraw-Hill, 1952, pp. 315-334