Talk:Rimsky-Korsakoffee House/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 02:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Another Believer (Talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 02:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with other FAs: Weather Machine, Rufus Does Judy at Carnegie Hall, & Music for a Time of War. Also verified with one GA: Allow Me (Portland, Oregon)
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Thorough check on Google in parallel with the criteria 2 above. Cross-checked with other FAs: Weather Machine, Rufus Does Judy at Carnegie Hall, & Music for a Time of War. Also verified with one GA: Allow Me (Portland, Oregon)
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) & (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:
- The first sentence of the lead should include the notability of the coffeehouse.
- I re-arranged the wording a bit so that "the city's oldest" is now in the first sentence. --Another Believer (Talk) 21:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give Relative emphasis to the Reception.
- I added a bit. More? --Another Believer (Talk)
- It's perfect now. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- I added a bit. More? --Another Believer (Talk)
- The lead needs to be expanded.
- I added a bit. More? --Another Believer (Talk)
- Doing... --Another Believer (Talk) 21:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's perfect now. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- "eclectic haunt" a "spooky alternative" ... .[6] (Check on source 6, unsuccessful, more is inaccessible to me, check on Google, query quote "eclectic haunt" + "spooky alternative", this quote appears in another RS (http://local.yahoo.com/info-21970299-rimskykorsakoffee-house-portland?viewtype=map) as "About: Attractive ice cream desserts and rich coffee are served while live classical music is performed in what was once the living room of an old, reportedly haunted Portland residence. This eclectic haunt is a spooky alternative to visiting a bar, club or movie. Sit at one of the tables or lounge on a couch.", either this link in ref needs to be confirmed or replaced)
- Yes, when I click on Ref. No. 6, and click on "More", I see both pieces of text ("eclectic haunt", "spooky alternative"). Perhaps you have popups disabled on your Internet browser? --Another Believer (Talk) 16:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- You're right. Works for me too, after changing browser settings. Good. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, when I click on Ref. No. 6, and click on "More", I see both pieces of text ("eclectic haunt", "spooky alternative"). Perhaps you have popups disabled on your Internet browser? --Another Believer (Talk) 16:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please confirm that link to source 6 for the above quotes works for you? Else it would need to be replaced.
- Works for me! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
"bizarre 70's style" ... [15] (Check on source 15 (Google Book), unsuccessful, No results found in this book for bizarre 70's style - Search all books », not in source 15)I think you might be referring to the wrong reference here. Immediately following the quote are two inline citations, including Number 5. When I view source Number 5, I see the quotation in the text. Let me know if this is fine. --Another Believer (Talk) 21:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Apologies. Thanks. It's indeed in the '5'. In fact, I did check it unknowingly in source 5 while checking for the quote "nearly hidden from view", but somehow missed it :). --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)No need to apologize. Just making sure! Thanks. --Another Believer (Talk) 21:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
It's a very promising GA nominee. I'm delighted to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Seabuckthorn, for your time and assistance. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for enriching our lives with music. Thanks for such fabulous articles. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)