Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittain Fraley

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 06:28, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn vanity. TheMidnighters 02:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Vanity. Flowerparty ^talk 02:44, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As above. Agentsoo 09:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Abstain. Truly less important than some drummer of a band that hasn't had a hit yet? --Wetman 10:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Some dude. In my hierarchy, at any rate, we have significant organizations that require articles, and then there is a much smaller subset of significant individuals whose participation in such a group makes them in need of biography. Please note that the most significant and wonderful organization in the world does not lead to biographies of every person in the organization. A biography is required when the biography itself is notable, when the person is known outside the organization. Otherwise, you'd say something of the person in the article on the organization and simply redirect the name to that article. In this case, we have an organization that is not significant enough for an article and some dude in it. Geogre 17:53, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• In the unlikely event that Westlake Data Corporation gets kept, merge with it. JYolkowski // talk 22:52, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete as nn. Denni☯ 23:37, 2005 July 26 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.