Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malibongo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Malibongo)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:38, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A cocktail thought to be invented in 2005. Gets 6 google hits, but none of them seem relevant. Wikipedia is only for subjects that have achieved a degree, however slight, of encyclopedic notability--some concoction thought up by a group of friends doesn't meet the bar. Sorry. Best, Meelar (talk) 15:20, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Similar to the way this drink is "unfettered by a determined recipe", let Wikipedia be "unfettered of a vanity article". Delete.--Scimitar parley 15:30, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Pavel Vozenilek 17:29, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think it's even patent nonsense. --DrTorstenHenning 17:46, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Nowhere near, AFAIK--see Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. Meelar (talk) 18:31, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 09:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "If being mixed/consumed in a motor vehicle (not by the driver, obviously), it is appropriate to shout out the word "Bongo" every time there may about to be a bump in the road, lest the mixers/consumers get the ratio of ingredients wrong or spill the drink in their lap." That's just silly, and the lack of Google hits confirms its non-notability. --Idont Havaname 18:41, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Yes it should be deleted, but hey, we all get silly sometimes. This is obviously a joke so let's maintain a sense of humour and not get too precious... --Mindlelor 19:41, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Above comment really by User:172.215.34.77. --Idont Havaname 03:49, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Above comment not relevant (and insufferably officious). --User:172.215.34.77 07:52, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Above comment really by User:172.215.34.77. --Idont Havaname 03:49, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.