Back Ss112 • ...I Care Because You Do • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Article ...I Care Because You Do (Log · Page History)
User Ss112 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 53
Minor edits 23 (43.4%)
(Semi-)automated edits 2 (3.8%)
Reverted edits 3 (5.7%)
atbe1 48.7
Added (bytes)2 300
Deleted (bytes) -2,633
Minor edits · 23 (43.4%)
Major edits · 30 (56.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 2 (3.8%)
Manual edits · 51 (96.2%)
Reverted edits · 3 (5.7%)
Unreverted edits · 50 (94.3%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2023-07-31 15:27 Diff · History 115 captions
2021-02-06 18:57 Diff · History -1 →Track listing: note params
2019-08-23 09:38 Diff · History 29 But Marc Weidenbaum did write the review of ICBYD in that piece. There was no reason to remove this. An author does not have to write the entirety of an article before we can credit them; if there are multiple, we can just list the applicable author
2019-07-29 07:10 Diff · History 16 (reverted)  anagrams of "Aphex Twin". Just stating they're anagrams is vague
2019-02-16 21:29 Diff · History 0 don't revert edits wholesale because you're too lazy to distinguish. Andrzejbanas: believes Richard D. James didn't produce his own record
2019-02-16 21:28 Diff · History -2 It IS in the source by stating "everything" was done by him, and I'm not arguing you with over a common sense issue thanks very much. I can't believe you're actually disputing that he produced music on a record credited to him. REGARDLESS, don't undo the other parts of my edit
2019-02-16 21:21 Diff · History 42 (reverted)  "Everything by Richard D. James." Quite sure that includes the music on the record. Please, do point me to another example of music on an Aphex Twin record that's by someone other than Richard D. James.
2019-02-16 21:19 Diff · History 13 Undid revision 883666596 by Andrzejbanas (talk) Erm? "Everything created by me" is the credit. That includes production, as he is a PRODUCER. Don't be ridiculous
2019-02-16 19:17 Diff · History 13 (reverted)  Sentence fragment (WP:LQ), punctuation...why is the producer field blank? Obviously James produces his own music
2019-02-15 11:32 Diff · History 0 wording; Rolling Stone review was in 1998, which wasn't on its release
2019-02-10 15:19 Diff · History 1
2019-02-09 04:10 Diff · History -1
2019-02-09 04:08 Diff · History 0 not a correct use of the hyphen; "all-time best" or the like is when to use it, not just saying "all time"
2019-02-09 04:06 Diff · History -10 differentiate
2019-02-09 04:04 Diff · History -169 yet another
2019-02-09 04:04 Diff · History -315 another repeated ref
2019-02-09 04:02 Diff · History -152 again...another repeated ref
2019-02-09 04:00 Diff · History -147 ELs should not be references that are already in the article, as this is
2019-02-09 03:58 Diff · History -180 Ref names...use them
2019-02-09 03:57 Diff · History 2 consistent link
2019-02-09 03:57 Diff · History -272 FFS, another one?
2019-02-09 03:56 Diff · History -29 consistent spacing in refs, not every parameter on a new line
2019-02-09 03:55 Diff · History -16 Yes, the AllMusic website was published in 1971. Very accurate
2019-02-09 03:54 Diff · History -2 don't need hexadecimal code
2019-02-09 03:53 Diff · History -1 spacing; sentence fragments are subject to WP:LQ
2019-02-09 03:52 Diff · History -236 stop repeating refs when you move stuff around
2019-02-09 03:51 Diff · History 10 website=UK Albums Chart? Righto. It's the OCC website
2019-02-09 03:50 Diff · History -257 don't need to repeat the ref
2019-02-09 03:50 Diff · History -15 don't need 1 in author parameters if there's only one author
2019-02-09 03:49 Diff · History -77 what is this for?
2019-02-09 03:48 Diff · History -8 replace ellipsis characters with three actual dots; MOS:CURLY
2019-02-09 03:47 Diff · History 0 WP:LQ, trip hop is not hyphenated there as it's not a quote
2019-02-02 10:54 Diff · History 0 rm ellipsis character; consistency
2019-02-02 10:54 Diff · History -17 →Track listing:
2019-02-02 10:53 Diff · History 0
2019-02-02 10:53 Diff · History -43 unexplained reordering of genres; trivia sections are discouraged
2019-01-28 07:44 Diff · History -22 Per Template:Infobox album, and source should say 21 January 2019 in the accessdate as it was added to this article then
2018-11-07 17:15 Diff · History -23 caps; date format
2018-09-20 13:02 Diff · History 33 differentiate
2018-08-23 04:05 Diff · History 23 →Personnel: Squeezed slightly next to and above that though is "Design help from John."
2018-08-23 04:04 Diff · History 0 →Reception:
2018-08-21 05:52 Diff · History 21 →Charts: sortable function useless for one entry
2018-08-21 05:51 Diff · History -17 formatting
2018-06-06 07:56 Diff · History -111 Reverted edits by 2600:387:B:9:0:0:0:84 (talk) to last version by PikaSka
2018-03-19 20:47 Diff · History 14 →Production: specific
2017-08-06 13:45 Diff · History 18 →Track listing: not the default
2017-08-06 13:45 Diff · History -481 →Track listing: No need to repeat the same tracks
2016-07-06 15:34 Diff · History 4 →Track listing: Cases of letters.
2016-07-06 15:00 Diff · History 2 →Reception:
2016-07-06 14:18 Diff · History 12 →Style: Wording.
2016-07-06 14:18 Diff · History -25 →Style: Fixed link.
2016-07-06 14:18 Diff · History 3 →Style:
2016-07-06 10:47 Diff · History -4 Wording.
All times are in UTC.