Jump to content

Śāstra pramāṇam in Hinduism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 53: Line 53:
The meaning is ''the source of dharma is declared to be fivefold: 1) śrutiḥ; 2) smṛtiḥ; sadācāraḥ (right conduct); svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ (one's own benefit) and 5) desire born of purposeful intention (samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmaḥ)''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=70uvBAAAQBAJ|title=Re-figuring the Ramayana as Theology: A History of Reception in Premodern India|author=Ajay K. Rao|publisher=Routledge|year=2015}}</ref>}}
The meaning is ''the source of dharma is declared to be fivefold: 1) śrutiḥ; 2) smṛtiḥ; sadācāraḥ (right conduct); svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ (one's own benefit) and 5) desire born of purposeful intention (samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmaḥ)''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=70uvBAAAQBAJ|title=Re-figuring the Ramayana as Theology: A History of Reception in Premodern India|author=Ajay K. Rao|publisher=Routledge|year=2015}}</ref>}}
==Instances of conflict==
==Instances of conflict==
Conflict between different epistemic sources, generally termed as ''virodha''. When there is an instance of conflict between the smriti and the śruti, the śruti shall prevail.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=qunYrHJTf9sC|title=Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy|work= Oliver Leaman|publisher=Routledge|page=503|year=2006}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|: {{lang|sa|श्रुतिस्मृति विरोधे तु श्रुतिरेव गरीयसी॥}}'' ({{IAST|śrutismṛti virodhe tu śrutireva garīyasī}})''}}
Whenever there is an instance of conflict between different sources, termed as ''virodha'', then as per Āpastamba, it is advised to refer more preceding epistemic sources as they hold more authority. In Āpastambasmṛti, it is mentioned as
Whenever there is conflict between different sources , then as per Āpastamba, it is advised to refer more preceding epistemic sources as they hold more authority. In Āpastambasmṛti, it is mentioned as
: {{lang|sa|श्रुतिस्मृतिपुराणेषु विरुद्धेषु परस्परम् । पूर्वं पूर्वं बलीयं स्यादिति न्यायविदो विदुः ॥}}
: {{lang|sa|श्रुतिस्मृतिपुराणेषु विरुद्धेषु परस्परम् । पूर्वं पूर्वं बलीयं स्यादिति न्यायविदो विदुः ॥}}
:''{{IAST|śrutismṛtipurāṇeṣu viruddheṣu parasparam</br>pūrvaṃ pūrvaṃ balīyam syāditi nyāyavido viduḥ}}''
:''{{IAST|śrutismṛtipurāṇeṣu viruddheṣu parasparam</br>pūrvaṃ pūrvaṃ balīyam syāditi nyāyavido viduḥ}}''
:– Āpastambasmṛti
:– Āpastambasmṛti
The meaning is ''whenever there is mutual conflict between vedas, smṛtis and purāṇas, then the ones well-versed in nyāya suggest that more preceding epistemic source holds higher weightage (than the later epistemic one)''.
The meaning is ''whenever there is mutual conflict between vedas, smṛtis and purāṇas, then the ones well-versed in nyāya suggest that more preceding epistemic source holds higher weightage (than the later epistemic one)''.

==See also==
==See also==
* [[Pramāṇa]]
* [[Pramāṇa]]

Revision as of 19:50, 17 May 2020

As per Āstika tradition of Hinduism, there are four authorized epistemic authorities termed as Pramāṇas Śāstras. They are the sources of reference for Puruṣārtha (dharma, Artha, Kāma and Mokṣa), the laws of the universe and of human conduct (Ācāra). It is considered obligatory to get accord from these epistemic sources, i.e. to have Śāstra pramāṇaṃ[1]. They are specified in an order as śruti (Vedas); smṛti, "that which is remembered, tradition (Dharmaśāstra); ācāra, good custom; and ātmatuṣṭi, "what is pleasing to oneself."[2] The first two are undisputed epistemic sources (pramāṇa), where śruti holds the ultimate or supreme authority as Śāstra pramāṇam. However, there is difference of opinion for the rest of the epistemicauthorized sources.

Origins

The importance of Śāstra pramāṇam in Hinduism can be understood from Bhagavadgita (Chapter 16, verse 24), where it is commanded by Krishna to have Śāstra pramāṇam before ascertaining what is to be done.[3][4][note 1]

According to Bhavishya Purana, Brahmaparva, Adhyaya 7, there are four sources of dharma: Śruti (Vedas), Smṛti (Dharmaśāstras, Puranas), Śiṣṭa Āchāra/Sadāchara (conduct of noble people) and finally Ātma tuṣṭi (self satisfaction). From the sloka:

वेदः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियमात्मनः । एतच्चतुर्विधं प्राहुः साक्षाद्धर्मस्य लक्षणम् ॥[6]
vedaḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyamātmanaḥ
etaccaturvidhaṃ prāhuḥ sākshāddharmasya lakshaṇam
– Bhavishya Purāṇa, Brahmaparva, Adhyāya 7

The meaning is: "vedas, smritis, good (approved) tradition and what is agreeable to one's soul (conscience), the wise have declared to be the four direct evidences of dharma."

Ultimate epistemic authority

Shruti (Sanskrit: श्रुति, IAST: Śruti, IPA: [ɕɽʊtɪ]) is considered as the ultimate epistemic authority or prathama pramāṇa. Shruti in Sanskrit means "that which is heard" and refers to the body of most authoritative, ancient religious texts comprising the central canon of Hinduism.[7] Manusmriti states that Śrutistu vedo vigneyaḥ (Sanskrit: श्रुतिस्तु वेदो विज्ञेय:, lit. means "Know that Vedas are Śruti"). Thus, it includes the four Vedas including its four types of embedded texts—the Samhitas, the early Upanishads, the Brahmanas and the Aranyakas.[8][9]

Penultimate epistemic authority

Smriti (Sanskrit: स्मृति, IAST: Smṛti) is considered as the penultimate epistemic authority or dvitīya pramāṇa. Smriti literally means "that which is remembered" and it a body of Hindu texts usually attributed to an author, traditionally written down, in contrast to Śrutis (the Vedic literature) considered authorless, that were transmitted verbally across the generations and fixed.[8] Smriti is a derivative secondary work and is considered less authoritative than Sruti in Hinduism, except in the Mimamsa school of Hindu philosophy.[7][10][11] The authority of smriti accepted by orthodox schools, is derived from that of shruti, on which it is based.[12][13]

The Smrti literature is a corpus of diverse varied texts.[7] This corpus includes, but is not limited to the six Vedāngas (the auxiliary sciences in the Vedas), the epics (the Mahābhārata and Rāmāyana), the Dharmasūtras and Dharmaśāstras (or Smritiśāstras), the Arthasaśāstras, the Purānas, the Kāvya or poetical literature, extensive Bhasyas (reviews and commentaries on Shrutis and non-Shruti texts), and numerous Nibandhas (digests) covering politics, ethics (Nitisastras),[14] culture, arts and society.[15][16]

Each Smriti text exists in many versions, with many different readings.[8] Smritis were considered fluid and freely rewritten by anyone in ancient and medieval Hindu tradition.[8][10]

Antepenultimate epistemic authority

While is unanimous opinion among sages on the ultimate and penultimate epistemic authority, there is some difference of opinion what constitute as antepenultimate one or tṛtīya pramāṇa. This has been clearly pointed out during the times of Mahabharata itself. In Anuśāsana-parva of Mahabharata, it is mentioned as

धर्मं जिज्ञासमानानां प्रमाणं प्रथमं श्रुतिः । द्वितीयं धर्मशास्त्रं तु तृतीयो लोकसंग्रहः​ ॥
dharmaṃ jijñāsamānānāṃ pramāṇaṃ prathamaṃ śrutiḥ
dvitīyaṃ dharmaśāstraṃ tu tṛtīyo lokasangrahaḥ
– Mahābhāratam, Anuśāsana-parvam

The meaning is those who have the 'desire to know dharma' (dharma jijñāsa), the first pramāṇa is śruti. The second pramāṇa are the dharmaśāstras (i.e. the dharma part of smṛti). The third reference is as per the custom of the people.

Śiṣṭāchāra/Sadāchara

To Manu, Yājñavalkya, Vaśiṣṭha and Baudhayana, the virtuous conduct of Śiṣṭas (virtous learned men) and practice of good men, Sadāchara is the antepenultimate pramāṇa after Śrutis and Smṛtis. [17]. Vaśiṣṭhasmṛti verse 1.4 quotes, tadalabhe śiṣṭāchārah pramāṇam, i.e. only if the relevant referenes are absent in those both, then Śiṣṭa Āchāra can be considered as Antepenultimate pramāṇa. According to the sage Vaśiṣṭha, Śruti and Smṛti are more important sources than others.[18] The Padma Purana also prescribes as similar view.[note 2]

Ācāra (Sanskrit: आचार) is a concept used in the context of Classical Hindu law that refers to the customary laws or community norms of a particular social group.[20] These community norms are delineated and put into practice by people who have earned the respect of those within each individual group, such as a community leader or elder. Although in Dharmaśāstra the ideal person who defines the ācāra of a particular place is dictated as one who knows the Vedas or is “learned”, in actual practice this role is often deferred to group leaders along with Vedic scholars.[21] Ācāra is theologically important in Hindu law because it is considered, along with the Vedas (Śruti), and Smriti (traditional texts such as the Dharmaśāstra literature), to be one of the sources of dharma.[22] Particular regional ācāra is believed to be canonized in Dharmaśāstra texts; however scholars differ on the source for the actual accounts found within these texts.[23]

Purāṇa

However, Āpastamba considers purāṇa as antepenultimate source of reference. In his Āpastambasmṛti, it has been mentioned as

यददृष्टम् हि वेदेषु तत् द्रष्टव्यं स्मृतौ किल​ । उभाभ्यां यददृष्टस्तु तत् पुराणेषु पठ्यते ॥[note 3]
yat adṛṣṭam hi vedeṣu tat draṣṭavyaṃ smṛta kila
ubhābhyāṃ yat adṛṣṭastu tat purāṇeṣu paṭhyate
– Āpastambasmṛti

The meaning is whenever there is no reference in vedas then smṛtis are to be referred. In case references are absent in the both, then purāṇas are to be consulted.

Preantepenultimate epistemic authority

Atmatusti is usually translated into English as being "what is pleasing to oneself."[25] The first three sources of law are rooted in the vedas, whereas atmatusti is not. It is because of this that atmatusti, as a fourth source (i.e. caturtha pramāṇa), is not recognized by most scholars due to the lack of legitimacy. Only Manu and Yājñavalkya refer to atmatusti as the fourth source of dharma within the Hindu Law tradition. Textual accounts of Manu's and Yajnavalkya's placement of atmatusti as a fourth source of dharma can be found in The Law Code of Manu 2.6 and The Law Code of Yajnavalkya 1.7. Also, atmatusti does not share the same authority as sruti, smriti, and acara. Atmatusti differs significantly from the other three sources of dharma in that it is not based on an "authority exterior to man"; in other words, an individual is able to create their own authority for any issue not covered under sruti, smriti, and acara.[26]

Ātmatuṣṭi is also known as Hṛdayānujña (free will) is mentioned also by Manu, Yājñavalkya and Vishnu distinctly mention this as a or source of moral and religion knowledge[27]. Yājñavalkya goes further step adding good intent as additional fifth source of Dharma.[note 4]

Instances of conflict

Conflict between different epistemic sources, generally termed as virodha. When there is an instance of conflict between the smriti and the śruti, the śruti shall prevail.[30][note 5] Similarly, Whenever there is conflict between different epistemic sources in general, then as per Āpastamba, it is advised to refer more preceding epistemic sources as they hold more authority. In Āpastambasmṛti, it is mentioned as

श्रुतिस्मृतिपुराणेषु विरुद्धेषु परस्परम् । पूर्वं पूर्वं बलीयं स्यादिति न्यायविदो विदुः ॥
śrutismṛtipurāṇeṣu viruddheṣu parasparam
pūrvaṃ pūrvaṃ balīyam syāditi nyāyavido viduḥ
– Āpastambasmṛti

The meaning is whenever there is mutual conflict between vedas, smṛtis and purāṇas, then the ones well-versed in nyāya suggest that more preceding epistemic source holds higher weightage (than the later epistemic one).

See also

References

  1. ^ https://www.sanskritdictionary.com/?q=%C5%9B%C4%81stra-pram%C4%81%E1%B9%87a
  2. ^ Olivelle, Patrick. 2004. The Law Code of Manu. 2.6.
  3. ^ "Universal Message of the Bhagavad Gita". Swami Ranganathananda. Advaita Ashrama. 2000. p. 599.
  4. ^ https://asitis.com/16/24.html
  5. ^ https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/16/verse/24
  6. ^ http://www.vedagyana.info/maha-puranas-telugu/bhavishya-purana/brahma-parva/?chapter=7
  7. ^ a b c James Lochtefeld (2002), "Smrti", The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 2: N–Z, Rosen Publishing, ISBN 978-0823931798, page 656-657
  8. ^ a b c d Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty (1988), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, Manchester University Press, ISBN 0-7190-1867-6, pages 2-3
  9. ^ A Bhattacharya (2006), Hinduism: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology, ISBN 978-0595384556, pages 8-14
  10. ^ a b Sheldon Pollock (2011), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia (Editor: Federico Squarcini), Anthem, ISBN 978-0857284303, pages 41-58
  11. ^ Harold G. Coward; Ronald Neufeldt; Eva K. Neumaier-Dargyay (1988). Readings in Eastern Religions. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-88920-955-8.; Quote: "smriti is classified as being based on (and therefore less authoritative than) the directly revealed, shruti, literature.";
    Anantanand Rambachan (1991). Accomplishing the Accomplished. University of Hawaii Press. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-8248-1358-1.;
    Ronald Inden; Jonathan S. Walters; et al. (2000). Querying the Medieval: Texts and the History of Practices in South Asia. Oxford University Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-19-512430-9.
  12. ^ René Guénon (2009). The Essential Ren‚ Gu‚non: Metaphysics, Tradition, and the Crisis of Modernity. World Wisdom, Inc. pp. 164–. ISBN 978-1-933316-57-4.
  13. ^ Pollock, Sheldon. "The Revelation of Tradition: śruti, smrti, and the Sanskrit Discourse of Power". In Squarcini, Federico (ed.). Boundaries, Dynamics And Construction Of Traditions In South Asia. London: Anthem Press. pp. 41–62. doi:10.7135/upo9781843313977.003. ISBN 978-1-84331-397-7.
  14. ^ smRti Monier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
  15. ^ Purushottama Bilimoria (2011), The idea of Hindu law, Journal of Oriental Society of Australia, Vol. 43, pages 103-130
  16. ^ Roy Perrett (1998), Hindu Ethics: A Philosophical Study, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0824820855, pages 16-18
  17. ^ S. K. Purohit (1994). "Ancient Indian legal philosophy: its relevance to contemporary jurisprudential thought". Deep & Deep Publications. p. 34.
  18. ^ "Rajadharma in Mahabharata: With Special Reference to Shanti-Parva". Priyanka Pandey. DK Print World (P) Ltd. 2019.
  19. ^ "Guru: The Universal Teacher". Swami B. P. Puri. Simon and Schuster. 2017.
  20. ^ Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter One.
  21. ^ Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter Seven
  22. ^ Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter One
  23. ^ Lariviere, Richard W. 1997. pp. 612.
  24. ^ Kandukuri Vireesalingam (1882). stri punarvivāha śāstrasangrahamu (PDF). pp. 686, .{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  25. ^ Olivelle, Patrick. 2004. The Law Code of Manu. 2.6.
  26. ^ Lingat 1973, p. 6.
  27. ^ "Journal & Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Volume 6". Asiatic Society. 1911. p. 300.
  28. ^ http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/1_sanskr/6_sastra/4_dharma/smrti/yajn2_pu.htm
  29. ^ Ajay K. Rao (2015). "Re-figuring the Ramayana as Theology: A History of Reception in Premodern India". Routledge.
  30. ^ "Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy". Oliver Leaman. Routledge. 2006. p. 503.

Notes

  1. ^ तस्मात् शास्त्रं प्रमाणं ते कार्याकार्यव्यवस्थितौ । ज्ञात्वा शास्त्रविधानोक्तं कर्म कर्तुमिहार्हसि ॥
    tasmāt śāstraṁ pramāṇam te kāryākārya vyavasthitau
    jñātvā śāstravidhānoktam karma kartumihārhasi
    – Bhagavadgita 16.24
    The meaning is Therefore, let the (vedic) scriptures (śāstraṁ) be your authority (pramāṇam) in determining what should be done and what should not be done. Understand the scriptural injunctions and teachings, and then perform your actions in this world accordingly.[5]
  2. ^ The Padma Purana as quoted in Bhakti-Sandarbhah states Śrutismr̥tī mamaivājñe yaste ullaṅghya vartate, Ājñācchedī mama dveṣī madbhakto’pi na vaiṣṇavaḥ (Sanskrit:श्रुतिस्मृती ममैवाज्ञे यस्ते उल्लङ्घ्य वर्तते । आज्ञाच्छेदी मम द्वेषी मद्भक्तोऽपि न वैष्णवः ॥lit. means "Śruti and Smr̥ti are in truth My commands. Whoever transgresses them, disobeys Me and is a hater of Me. Though a devotee, He is not a votary of Viṣṇu.").[19]
  3. ^ Prominent social reformer Kandukuri Veeresalingam Pantulu has quoted these slokas from Āpastambasmṛti in his Telugu essay on widow remarriage, stri punarvivāha śāstrasangrahamu.[24]
  4. ^ : श्रुतिः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियं आत्मनः । सम्यक्संकल्पजः कामो धर्ममूलं इदं स्मृतम् ॥[28]
    śrutiḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ
    samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmo dharmamūlaṃ idaṃ smṛtam
    – Yājñavalkya Smṛti 1.7
    The meaning is the source of dharma is declared to be fivefold: 1) śrutiḥ; 2) smṛtiḥ; sadācāraḥ (right conduct); svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ (one's own benefit) and 5) desire born of purposeful intention (samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmaḥ).[29]
  5. ^ : श्रुतिस्मृति विरोधे तु श्रुतिरेव गरीयसी॥ (śrutismṛti virodhe tu śrutireva garīyasī)

Sources

  • Davis, Jr. Donald R. Forthcoming. Spirit of Hindu Law
  • Lingat, Robert (1973), The Classical Law of India, University of California Press

Further reading

  • Domenico Francavilla (2006), The roots of hindu jurisprudence: sources of Dharma and interpretation in Mīmāṃsā and Dharmaśāstra