Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Asilvering 0 0 0 N/A Discussion 09:15, 6 September 2024 6 days, 10 hours no report

Question about the impacts of a WP:RENAME on templates

[edit]

Hey Hawkeye7, I hope you don't mind my asking here as you seem pretty experienced in managing templates, in addition to being well versed in the backend of DYK and GAN.

I've recently completed a RENAME and I was curious how that would impact some of the records of the templates. Specifically, a DYK you've recently reviewed but is not yet closed, as well as an outstanding GAN that is yet to be started that has my former name on the the GAN page as well as the template on the article's talk page.

Specifically, my concerns with the DYK records are that the template maintains attribution in regard to the requirements for reviewing. I've only nominated one and haven't reviewed any so the impact there should be minimal.

And then in regard to the GAN, the review hasn't started but I believe the template has mechanisms to notify the nominator and maintain a record with wmtools as well? This, I'm even less sure about the impact. My assumption would be that I could replace the name in the templates, but I didn't want to (1) break anything or (2) miss something and then break something that is harder to track down and fix (see number 1).

Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated, or if you could point me in the right direction

Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk), formerly MicrobiologyMarcus (talk).

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template does not notify the nominator; this is done by a bot.
  • For the DYK, edit the nomination template to change the {{DYKmake}} card to reflect your new name. When the nomination is transferred to the prep area, the prep area builder will cut and paste this template. It gets picked up by a bot that will notify you. You can change it yourself until it reaches the queue; then you will need an admin to make the change for you.
  • I am unsure as to whether simply changing the name on the GA nominations page will work or not; ask on the Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. The notification is done by a bot, and it keeps a database.
Regards
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about MOS:MILHIST

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye,

A certain user is claiming that MOS:MILHIST does not allow for mentioning Treaties in a bullet point in the Result section of the infobox of War and Battle articles. This user has been deleting these treaties out of the infoboxes of multiple articles. This user also claims that MOS:MILHIST does not allow for the duration of the war to be stated in parenthesis after the dates that the war lasted from. For example if the Date section originally said "8 February 1904 – 5 September 1905 (1 year, 6 months and 4 weeks)" he will delete it to "8 February 1904 – 5 September 1905" and claim that MOS:MILHIST does not allow for the parathesis containing the duration of time.
Please let me know if this is truely following MOS:MILHIST and that this user is doing the right thing.
Thanks, Alexysun (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not aware of any such stricture. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore, based on the information I have provided at least, is it accurate to conclude that this user has an inaccurate understanding of MOS:MILHIST? Alexysun (talk) 22:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification on adding to WPMH FA list

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7, I was confused about an issue I hoped you could help out with. I was wondering if the Chalukya dynasty, Western Chalukya Empire and Western Ganga dynasty articles could be added to the WPMH FA list. I know more milhist could be added to these articles and I will surely do so. Wdyt? Thanks in advance Matarisvan (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Normally the bot adds articles but it does not know when you add one to the project. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that! Also, do you think the FAs Cadaver Tomb of René of Chalon and Tomb of Philippe Pot fall within the WPMH mandate, particularly the memorials task force? Both died in battle so I think they might. Thanks in advance. Matarisvan (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frederic B. Butler

[edit]

I have assessed B for military history and biography. The high points of his career are noted in the lede. I have asked for a slightly longer lede for B if the article is of some length in some cases. This is about all I can see at first glance that a GA assessor might want but some assessors might add other comments, as you know. I have added

in the article Frederick Butler. There is another such tag in the Frederick Butler article. Donner60 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2023 World Snooker Championship/archive2 does not seem to have been processed by the bot -- I noticed it while going through the July FAC stats. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was processed, but for some reason the previous nomination was improperly closed and so it thought that the nomination had been archived. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Matterhorn logistics

[edit]

On 6 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Matterhorn logistics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Matterhorn logistics involved the construction of airfields in China by thousands of laborers with hammers and wicker baskets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Matterhorn logistics. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Operation Matterhorn logistics), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Galileo project scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 18 October 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 18, 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 2024. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. – SchroCat (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jon McBride

[edit]

On 10 August 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jon McBride, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: July 2024

[edit]




Headlines
  • Albania report: For what matters most for your community
  • Argentina report: Mid-term digitization update
  • Brazil report: Structuring Wiki Loves Monuments through a Wikidata portal
  • Canada report: CCA Hosts Inaugural Wiki Edit-a-Thon
  • Germany report: The flight over the "Rosinenbomber" - drone deployment for Free Knowledge; Kicking off a German-language community of practice for building cultural heritage linked open data with the wikimedia projects
  • India report: GLAM partner ventures into 'Digitisation Plus' programs with Wikimedians
  • Kosovo report: Prompting what's most important - our community in Albania and Kosovo
  • New Zealand report: WikiProject International Botanical Congress 2024, a presentation to the Natural History Museum, London & Kew Gardens staff and a Research expeditions edit-a-thon
  • Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programme
  • UK report: Translations galore
  • USA report: Wikicurious WikiNYC Civic Hall; San Diego 111; #5WomenArtists campaign
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library report: BHL-Wiki Working Group July monthly highlights
  • Special story: GLAM GLobal meetup & GLAM Global Calls
  • Calendar: August's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2024-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]

Promotion of Battle of Tinian

[edit]
Congratulations, Hawkeye7! The article you nominated, Battle of Tinian, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPARS A-Class nomination

[edit]

@Hawkeye7: The adding of sandbox, I'm srry to say, still does not allow me to nominate the SPARS article for A-Class. I hope you'll be able to help me further with the nomination. Thank you. Pendright (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have created it manually for you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Pendright (talk) 21:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest J. King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Truk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John S. McCain Sr.

[edit]

On 20 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John S. McCain Sr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John S. McCain Sr. and John S. McCain Jr. (both pictured) were the first father-and-son pair to achieve the U.S. rank of four-star admiral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John S. McCain Sr.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John S. McCain Sr.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 28,190 views (1,174.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any info available on her career post 2012? LibStar (talk) 01:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She has no more international caps; that was the climax of her career. Goes by the name of Alicia Smith now. Worked for Water Polo Australia for a time. Now mostly coaches. [9][10][11][12][13] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Greenglass

[edit]

Your edit to David Greenglass states "He was honorably discharged from the Army on February 29, 1946". 1946 was not a leap year. Could you check your source please? Assuming you still have access nine years on. Thanks. Cabayi (talk) 09:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. It is what it says in his FBI file [14] (p. 11) CIA says February 1946. [15] Suggest we go with that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least the CIA citation has the virtue of not being an imaginary date. Thanks for the speedy reply. I'll leave it to you - I'm not going to steal credit for your research. Cabayi (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have corrected the article, but since nobody checks against the Wikipedia, expect sources to continue to repeat the 29 February date. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Lyne article

[edit]

The sentence starting with "Too young to see service during the First World War..." seemed possibly inaccurate to me. An article in War History Online https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/the-boy-soldiers-of-wwi.html entitled "Almost 250,000 Boys Under The Age Of 18 Fought In The British Army In WWI" states that the age of enlistment was 18 and the age for service overseas was 19. Unless this is wrong or there was another condition, or I don't fully understand it, it seems Lyne was old enough to have served in the last months of WWI without even being in the large group of underage boys who served despite the age requirements. (Many were mustered out as the war progressed if their parents produced a birth certificate showing their actual age but many were also casualties.) I mention this for your consideration in case you wish to remove the phrase. My guess is that someone would question it if it were included without a further explanation. Donner60 (talk) 04:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he could have. Overseas service was consider to be leaving the UK for France, not Australia for the UK, so the AIF had an entire battalion of 18 year olds who were trained in the UK and then shipped to France as reinforcements when they reached the age of 19. In Lyne's case he did not graduate from Sandhurst until April 1919. I have re-worded the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you today for Anna Lee Fisher, about "one of the first six women selected to be astronauts by NASA in 1978. During her long and distinguished career at NASA, she was involved with the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station and the Orion spacecraft. This article is the fifth in the series about the first six women astronauts, following Sally Ride, Judith Resnik, Kathryn Sullivan and Rhea Seddon. Unlike those astronauts, Fisher has no biography, so its writing was more difficult."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]