Jump to content

User talk:Ktkvtsh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MainTalkTo DoSandboxArticle TrackingDraftPhotosAwardsUseful StuffWatchlist

And per myself

[edit]

The Kip (contribs) 23:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reg: Navneeth Sundar page

[edit]

Hi, Thanks for reviewing the page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Navneeth_Sundar

I have been trying to get this page ready for Navneeth to get better visibility for him in his career as a musician. That's the intention.

I saw your comments for rejection. While it is disappointing, If May I ask which specific sections need additional references in reflist? If you could share that please. I have tried adding as many references as possible. Was a bit confident that it would get approved :-)

I thought I would reach out and get some more clarity.

Regards Senthil ACS Senthil.acs (talk) 22:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several things I can advise you to work on. Every statement that could be argued needs an inline citation. I would remove the two images of Sundar holding up pieces of paper as they are not necessary. Currently it is looking like WP:PROMO, and Wikipedia is not meant to be a promotional tool. I have a question for you, are you being paid to create this page for Sundar? Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi thanks for responding. Not at all. I am not paid for this. Navneeth is my childhood friend. I am helping in this page creation as he is not having enough time to create one for himself. Senthil.acs (talk) 01:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This would be a conflict of interest as you have a relation to the subject WP:COI. This isn't allowed. I wouldn't recommend that you re-submit the draft. Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will be of great help if you could help me with this page. I will try to edit the page with more inline citations and remove those that are just claims without citations.
What options do I have if there is a conflict of interest? Thanks for helping. Senthil.acs (talk) 01:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As of right now, Sundar does not meet the notability guidelines, so there is nothing we can do right now. Review the hyperlinked page to learn more about notability. Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Ktkvtsh I will try to work based on the guidelines. Senthil.acs (talk) 01:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declination

[edit]

Hello! Thanks for reviewing my draft, Imon Boy. Could you give me more information regarding the issue with the sources? Everything is sourced, and I use the Cite Highlighter script and it didn’t mark any of them as unreliable. -- NotCharizard 🗨 05:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone my review of the draft, allowing another reviewer to assess it. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kristin van Zwieten

[edit]

Hi, could you re-evaluate your decline for Draft:Kristin van Zwieten? I believe the notability requirement has been met. Multiple independent sources (i.e., many court judgments) have been cited to demonstrate that her work is regularly cited and has a influential impact in the highest courts in England and Hong Kong (which is the highest achievement for legal academics and would also meet requirement "7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity").

Moreover and alternatively, I believe the notability requirement "5.The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research" has been met as she is a tenured and named professor (Clifford Chance Professor of Law and Finance) at the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxford which clearly a major institution of higher education and research? Chadwick02138 (talk) 20:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add more personal information, such as where Zwieten is from and a date of birth. Then, resubmit the draft for another reviewer to re-evaluate. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

would you be able to help me, i want to properly edit and cite material as you asked but im unsure. 2603:7080:69F0:8430:906C:5F8:B064:9FB1 (talk) 15:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure can. I'd recommend reading WP:CITE, WP:GNG, and WP:INLINE.
I will have some time over the weekend to help more. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]