Development and Diversity of Epibiont Assemblages on Cultivated Sugar Kelp (Saccharina latissima) in Relation to Farming Schedules and Harvesting Techniques
- PMID: 36676158
- PMCID: PMC9865293
- DOI: 10.3390/life13010209
Development and Diversity of Epibiont Assemblages on Cultivated Sugar Kelp (Saccharina latissima) in Relation to Farming Schedules and Harvesting Techniques
Abstract
Seaweed farming in Europe is growing and may provide environmental benefits, including habitat provisioning, coastal protection, and bioremediation. Habitat provisioning by seaweed farms remains largely unquantified, with previous research focused primarily on the detrimental effects of epibionts, rather than their roles in ecological functioning and ecosystem service provision. We monitored the development and diversity of epibiont assemblages on cultivated sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) at a farm in Cornwall, southwest UK, and compared the effects of different harvesting techniques on epibiont assemblage structure. Increases in epibiont abundance (PERMANOVA, F4,25 = 100.56, p < 0.001) and diversity (PERMANOVA, F4,25 = 27.25, p < 0.001) were found on cultivated kelps over and beyond the growing season, reaching an average abundance of >6000 individuals per kelp plant with a taxonomic richness of ~9 phyla per kelp by late summer (August). Assemblages were dominated by crustaceans (mainly amphipods), molluscs (principally bivalves) and bryozoans, which provide important ecological roles, despite reducing crop quality. Partial harvesting techniques maintained, or increased, epibiont abundance and diversity beyond the farming season; however, these kelp plants were significantly fouled and would not be commercially viable in most markets. This paper improves understanding of epibiont assemblage development at European kelp farms, which can inform sustainable, ecosystem-based approaches to aquaculture.
Keywords: biofouling; ecosystem approach to aquaculture; macroalgal cultivation; partial harvesting; seaweed aquaculture.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
![Figure 1](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g002.gif)
![Figure 3](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g003.gif)
![Figure 4](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g004.gif)
![Figure 5](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g005.gif)
![Figure 6](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g006.gif)
![Figure 7](http://178.128.105.246/host-https-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9865293/bin/life-13-00209-g007.gif)
Similar articles
-
The sugar kelp Saccharina latissima I: recent advances in a changing climate.Ann Bot. 2024 Mar 8;133(1):183-212. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad173. Ann Bot. 2024. PMID: 38109285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Environmental impact of kelp (Saccharina latissima) aquaculture.Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jun;155:110962. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110962. Epub 2020 May 18. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020. PMID: 32469791
-
Supporting ecosystem services of habitat and biodiversity in temperate seaweed (Saccharina spp.) farms.Mar Environ Res. 2023 Oct;191:106162. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106162. Epub 2023 Sep 11. Mar Environ Res. 2023. PMID: 37716281
-
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture with sugar kelp and oysters in a shallow coastal salt pond and open estuary site.Front Aquac. 2023 May 9;2:1-14. doi: 10.3389/faquc.2023.1147524. Front Aquac. 2023. PMID: 37854119 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of kelp cultivation on the Ecological Status of benthic habitats and Zostera marina seagrass biomass.Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Oct 15;123(1-2):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.048. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017. PMID: 28751026 Review.
Cited by
-
The sugar kelp Saccharina latissima I: recent advances in a changing climate.Ann Bot. 2024 Mar 8;133(1):183-212. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad173. Ann Bot. 2024. PMID: 38109285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metabolomics and Microbiomics Insights into Differential Surface Fouling of Three Macroalgal Species of Fucus (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) That Co-Exist in the German Baltic Sea.Mar Drugs. 2023 Nov 16;21(11):595. doi: 10.3390/md21110595. Mar Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37999420 Free PMC article.
References
-
- FAO . The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA); FAO; Rome, Italy: 2020.
-
- Schlarb-Ridley B., Parker B. A Road Map for Algal Technologies in the UK. 2013. [(accessed on 8 January 2023)]. Available online: https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Roadmapping/UK-Roadmap-for-Algal-T....
-
- Capuzzo E., McKie T. Seaweed in the UK and Abroad—Status, Products, Limitations, Gaps and CEFAS Role. [(accessed on 8 January 2023)];2016 Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-seaweed-industry-in-the-u....
-
- Buschmann A.H., Camus C., Infante J., Neori A., Israel Á., Hernández-González M.C., Pereda S.V., Gomez-Pinchetti J.L., Golberg A., Tadmor-Shalev N., et al. Seaweed production: Overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017;52:391–406. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175. - DOI
-
- Wood D., Capuzzo E., Kirby D., Mooney-McAuley K., Kerrison P. UK macroalgae aquaculture: What are the key environmental and licensing considerations? Mar. Policy. 2017;83:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.021. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources