The accuracy of computer-based diagnostic tools for the identification of concurrent genetic disorders
- PMID: 30475443
- DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.40651
The accuracy of computer-based diagnostic tools for the identification of concurrent genetic disorders
Abstract
The increasing use of next-generation sequencing, especially clinical exome sequencing, has revealed that individuals having two coexisting genetic conditions are not uncommon occurrences. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy of two methodologically distinct computational differential diagnosis generating tools-FindZebra and SimulConsult-in identifying multiple genetic conditions in a single patient. Clinical query terms were generated for each of 15 monogenic disorders that were effective in resulting in the top 10 list of differential diagnoses for each of the 15 monogenic conditions when entered into these bioinformatics tools. Then, the terms of over 125 pairings of these conditions were entered using each tool and the resulting list of diagnoses evaluated to determine how often both diagnoses of a pair were represented in that list. Neither tool was successful in identifying both members of a pair of conditions in greater than 40% of test cases. Disorder detection sensitivity was not homogeneous within a tool, with each tool favoring the identification of a subset of genetic conditions. In view of recent exome sequencing data showing an unexpectedly high prevalence of coexistent monogenic conditions, the results from this pilot study highlight a need for the development of computational tools designed to effectively generate differential diagnoses with consideration of the possibility of coexisting conditions.
Keywords: co-occurring diagnoses; coexistent diagnoses; computational tool; differential diagnosis; dual diagnoses.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Missed diagnoses: Clinically relevant lessons learned through medical mysteries solved by the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1397. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1397. Epub 2020 Jul 30. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020. PMID: 32730690 Free PMC article.
-
wKGGSeq: A Comprehensive Strategy-Based and Disease-Targeted Online Framework to Facilitate Exome Sequencing Studies of Inherited Disorders.Hum Mutat. 2015 May;36(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/humu.22766. Epub 2015 Apr 4. Hum Mutat. 2015. PMID: 25676918
-
New tools for Mendelian disease gene identification: PhenoDB variant analysis module; and GeneMatcher, a web-based tool for linking investigators with an interest in the same gene.Hum Mutat. 2015 Apr;36(4):425-31. doi: 10.1002/humu.22769. Hum Mutat. 2015. PMID: 25684268 Free PMC article.
-
[Genetic testing in the fetus and child].Ther Umsch. 2013 Nov;70(11):621-31. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000457. Ther Umsch. 2013. PMID: 24168795 Review. German.
-
[A consensus on the standardization of the next generation sequencing process for the diagnosis of genetic diseases (3) - Data analysis].Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 10;37(3):345-351. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2020.03.021. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32128756 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
A review of the current state of the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer diagnosis.Open Life Sci. 2022 Dec 9;17(1):1600-1611. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0517. eCollection 2022. Open Life Sci. 2022. PMID: 36561500 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical