Ecummenic
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Last Austrias in Spain.JPG was uncategorized on 17 October 2009.
- Image:OETERREICH (3).jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2009.
- Image:Michel Garnier toilette.jpg was uncategorized on 4 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Frederica Anhalt-Bernburg by Tischbein.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Elegant woman by Jollain.jpg was uncategorized on 24 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Luise Ulrike in blue.jpg was uncategorized on 24 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Von Bose by Holtzmann.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
editThank you for your wonderful work categorizing portraits. I saw it with Schimmelmann. Marvelous! If you feel so inclined, please take a look at the artwork images I've uploaded and add many more categories to them. I would appreciate it very much. Jdsteakley (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Portraits
editHi, thanks for your work! Can you also, if will note some, add more pictures in Category:Hunting portraits and Category:Promenade portraits? Thanks from Moscow ) --Shakko (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Categories
editHi, you can use this Help:Gadget-HotCat, and you'll add categories more quickly. --Shakko (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Please note the new Category:Coronation portraits and it's subcategories. --Shakko (talk) 21:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
dressing gown or bathrobe or overall
editHi, Ecummenic! Can you give me an advise - as I'm Russian and not native English speaker, I can't choose the right word for this clothing. How would you name the category for this clothing in art? File:Roman Maximovich Volkov - Ivan Krylov.jpg, File:Fedor Petrovich Tolstoy b.jpg and File:RepinMussorgsky.jpg?--Shakko (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- so, let it be category:bathrobes in art? or maybe, to include the variations, category:deshabille in art?--Shakko (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- ok, thanks for advice )--Shakko (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Silver clothing in art
editNot too sure how many of the images you're adding to that category are really valid; File:Metsu viola-de-gamba.jpg seems to be wearing shiny light blue satin, File:Labille-Guiard, Adélaïde - Selfportrait - 1785 - cropped.jpg shiny light green satin, etc. AnonMoos (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi! No need to add cat. Nobility of Russia, if there is already cat. House of XXXX - all these houses are already subcats of Nobility of Russia --Shakko (talk) 08:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Please don't blank pages
editHi Ecummenic,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Charles Emmanuel Leclerq on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 19:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk
Hi! Maybe it will be interesting for you to know about this type of portrait composition.Shakko (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Please preserve multi-lingual image descriptions
editHi Ecummenic! Please preserve multi-lingual image descriptions when replacing the Information template by the Painting template. You can use the template LangSwitch for this purpose. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Having noticed your username so many times, it has encouraged me to write you personally, dear Ecummenic.
I am afraid the portrait in question is attributed to Aleksander Kucharski. A portrait, the sitter of which is identified as Choderlos de Laclos (Versailles, Châteaux de Versailles et de Trianon), was previously attributed to Maurice Quentin de La Tour ; it has been attributed to Joseph Ducreux.
There is another version of the same work: Laclos.jpg.
Thank you.--Thorvaldsson (talk) 18:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
File: Trazegnies 050911 (53).JPG
editBonjour Ecummenic,
Lorsque vous effectuez un changement ayant trait à l'information en rapport avec l'auteur de l'oeuvre photographiée, pourriez-vous préservez les descriptions multilingues comme cela vous a été demandé ci-dessus par l'administrateur Sir Gawain.
Merci d'avance.
Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Please
editDon't make edits with casual informations, as you did here. Thanks, --Marco dimmi tutto! 15:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Maria Antonia or Johanna Gabriela?
editIn this edit you claimed that the portrait File:Marie Antoinette by Liotard.jpg actually depicts Johanna Gabriela and not Maria Antonia. Are you sure? In 1762 Liotard painted pastel portraits of all six children, which you can see together here; I think they are, in the reading order, the portraits of: Maria Elisabeth; Karl Joseph; Maria Amalia; Johanna Gabriela; Maria Josepha; and Maria Antonia. What is presumably Liotard's portrait of Johanna Gabriela can be found here. --Lambiam 19:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Category renaming
editHi, thank you for the great work. It might be easier if you compile a list of categories to be renamed using Special:Categories/17, Special:PrefixIndex/Category:17, Special:Search/intitle:Category:17 century or using catscan. Personaly, I copy (text) such things in excel which makes it easy to convert them all in a
Rename Category:17th century paintings by genre to Category:17th-century paintings by genre (12 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.17th century paintings by genre;17th-century paintings by genre;r; |
format (by copy pasting 3 columns). Then you can submit such a list to COM:DL. Best. --Foroa (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
editThank you for the category fixes on the images I've uploaded, like the recent one by Godfrey Kneller. You always do a good job. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Internationalization
editWhy did you take away the internationalization of the descriptions of the pictures (== {{int:filedesc}} == --> == Summary == and „see below“)? --Botaurus (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
→ Porträtt af fröken Charlotta Fredrika Sparre, klädd som vestal --Thorvaldsson (talk) 10:10, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for categorising images. --Thorvaldsson (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom
editHi Ecummenic, you added to the category Category:Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom. The source simply says it is Princess Beatrice, no more. Comparing this portrait with the photographs of the older Beatrice, it shows that the nose is quite different, so I have my doubts. How do you know it is princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom and not some other princess Beatrice? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Non l'avevo mai visto prima quel ritratto. Beh, è un po' bruttina ;)
Grazie!
--Thorvaldsson (talk) 12:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Your category namings
editHi, what's the deal about the dash after the centuries?
Category:16th-century oil on wood paintings Category:16th-century oil portraits of women Category:16th-century oil portraits of women at full length Category:19th-century oil portraits of girls at half length and so on. In my opinion, it's a typo so I would like to rename it (like ike Category:16th century oil on wood paintings. --Mattes (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Question
editWhat first line here stand for? :) thanks. Regards. --Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:34, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
If you'll notice more, add, please. --Shakko (talk) 18:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ecummenic. Something went wrong with the date. Could you please have a look? --Leyo 09:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I do not believe that such a category is an accurate naming. In the sixteenth century it was independent states without political unity. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Re:
François de Poilly (1623–1693) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Alternative names |
Francois De I Poilly; François De Poilly; Francois de, I Poilly; Francois de, the elder Poilly; François de, I Poilly; François I de Poilly; François Poilly | ||
Description | French engraver | ||
Date of birth/death | 1623 | 1 April 1693 | |
Location of birth/death | Abbeville | Paris | |
Work period | Baroque | ||
Work location | |||
Authority file |
I suspect there may be some confusion here. The engraver of the image at File:Lacoste, Lesage, La Font - La Princesse de Carizme act1sc2 - césar.jpg is probably François (II) de Poilly (born Paris, 3 May 1671; buried Paris, 17 April 1723), the son of the François (I) de Poilly (born Abbéville, 1622; died Paris, March 1693). There was also François (III) de Poilly (baptised Paris, 8 May 1671 – buried Paris, 9 December 1741), son of Nicolas (I) de Poilly (born Abbéville, 1626; buried Paris, 3 March 1696). It is sometimes not possible to know which man did the engraving, since they probably worked as a family in the same atelier or one nearby. However, in this case, we can certainly eliminate François (I) since he died before the opéra-comique was created. (BTW, the life dates I use are from Bénézit. Other sources have some differences.) --Robert.Allen (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Ecummenic. With this edit you added the file page to the above maintenance category. See my fix in another case. --Leyo 07:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Removing a licence
editPlease be a little more attentive when modifying image details because you removed the copyright tag, I presume by accident, with this edit. I don't know if you did this more than once, so you may want to check your similar edits. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ecummenic. Could you please fix this edit? --Leyo 12:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- PMJI, but I noticed that in a later edit, you removed data (size and ID) that had been added by another user. Was this intentional? Laura1822 (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Artwork template
editHello, Ecummenic! Some of your edits use the template "Painting," but this redirects to {{Artwork}}. You should always use {{Artwork}}, not Painting. Otherwise, keep up the great work! Laura1822 (talk) 21:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Please don't use exclamation marks as indexing keys
edit[1]. Our universal keys for indexing are * and blank; when these two are taken use + or #. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 20:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright tag removal
editI assume the part of this edit that removed the copyright tag was a mistake, for the image I found in Category:Media without a license: needs history check today. Please be more careful when editing such image details because it could well have been deleted for lack of a licence except that I reviewed the history, found the problem and fixed it. If you intentionally removed the licence then please tag it for deletion as missing a licence. You may want to review it. Regards Ww2censor (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Featured picture nomination - Ed Koch
editHello Ecummenic,
Please support or oppose this nomination: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Koch_%E2%80%93_Mayor_of_the_City_of_New_York.jpg
Copyright status: File:Augusta Frederika by Liotard.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Augusta Frederika by Liotard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:William, Duke of Gloucester y Liotard.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:William, Duke of Gloucester y Liotard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Olof von Dalin by Scheffel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A barnstar for you!
editThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC) |
Favourites has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Alan Liefting (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm about to close this discussion as delete. You might want to look at it. --rimshottalk 21:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ecummenic. Something went wrong when you edited File:Koningin Maria Lescynska.jpg. --Leyo 18:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- I am still waiting for your correction. --Leyo 16:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect dates
editGood morning Ecummenic, while cleaning some meta information of files i came across paintings to which you added dates which are invalid, such as https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:1481_Kasimir.jpg&diff=77138776&oldid=77023328. Since i could not understand what you intended date was i kindly ask to do the correction on you own. Beside the mentioned one there are a few other paintings in Category:Pages using Complex date template with incorrect parameter. Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Should i apply your change as well to the other files? --Arnd (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
edithttps://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Nested {{Other date}} templates
editHiya. Please don't do it that way, use {{Complex date}} instead. Instead of {{otherdate|mid|{{otherdate|century|19}}}}, the wikitext would be {{complex date |adj1=mid |date1=19 |precision1=century}}. It gives the same output, but it's less complicated. (FWIW, the documentation for other date mentions that not nesting them is 'preferred'.) Thanks. Revent (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Ferdinando II de Medici
editprejudice Ecummenic,, I'm writing to ask if you look for this portrait of the second half of the 600 portraying the Grand Duke Ferdinand II de Medici. the author of the portrait is Valore Casini (1590–1660) Link of Portrait:http://www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Menu-Utility/Immagine/index.html_645008884.html --82.55.80.95 13:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)--82.50.35.170 20:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Museo del Prado
editAunque nunca hemos hablado, encantado de saludarle y de felicitarle por sus espléndidas aportaciones. Quería comentarle una cosa, sobre todo porque ha subido usted a Commons cientos (y tal vez miles) de retratos. El Museo del Prado, como sabe, es la pinacoteca más grande del país y una de las mayores del mundo, y lamentablemente en Commons sus categorías dejan mucho que desear. ¿De qué sirve, a la hora de la verdad, añadirle a un cuadro la categoría, por ejemplo, de 17th-century portrait paintings in the Prado Museum si a la hora de la verdad en el Prado hay varios miles de retratos de ese siglo? ¿No cree como yo que ha llegado la hora de dividir los retratos de un siglo, por poner un ejemplo, en masculinos, femeninos o infantiles, y también por supuesto en retratos reales, o de nobles, militares, etc.
Si se tratara de un museo corriente no habría problema, pero esto que le propongo requiere la colaboración de varias personas y por supuesto que haya un poco de consenso....luego le sigo escribiendo que me tengo que ir-Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 11:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Como le iba diciendo, yo mismo he subido a Commons cientos de pinturas o retratos del Museo del Prado, al igual que otros usuarios como usted o Enrique Cordero o Escarlati, aunque este último hace ya bastante que no colabora. Pero esto que le comento es una labor de titanes y me gustaría conocer la opinión también de administradores, como Cookie o Rastrojo. Un saludo.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ya que solicitaban mi opinión, humildemente yo diría que, efectivamente, es una buena idea crear subcategorías dentro de un determinado siglo. Las que sugiere Tiberioclaudio me parecen acertadas. Por sexo, edad, realeza, nobleza, etc. Tiene lógica. Al fin y al cabo, hablando de retratos en general, ya existen subcategorías como estas, por poner sólo un ejemplo. --Zaqarbal (talk) 03:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks!
editYou poked File:Sgt Major Christian Fleetwood - American Civil War Medal of Honor recipient.jpg back into my watchlist - and I thus was enouraged to check if any larger copies had come available... and they had. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ecummenic.
It seems that this picture is not the portrait of Antoine Gombaud Chevalier de Méré but Pierre Corneille's. see File:Pierre Corneille 2.jpg.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Portrait paintings by year
editI wanted to thank you for Template:Portraitpaintingcat which fills in all the categories automagically for Category:Portrait paintings by year. I have just taken some time and created all the missing category pages for the 20th and 21st centuries, so we now have category pages for every year from 1490 to 2016. The template made this orders of magnitude easier, leaving me more time to go through the paintings in the decade categories and sort them into their year categories. There are perhaps two dozen or so empty categories, but I hope they'll get filled in now that they exist.
The template creates a category "Year paintings by genre," most of which are red-linked. I looked at a few that had been created but could not find a similar template to Portraitpaintingcat. Would you create a template for that, or direct me to it if it already exists?
Also, there is a category set Category:20th-century portrait paintings by year which someone started but didn't get very far. I think this is somewhat redundant, just making another layer of complexity. What do you think?
Thanks for all your hard work! Laura1822 (talk) 13:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- I would like to revise my request. Can you teach me how to make these types of templates? Because I have some other categories for which I'd like to do something similar. I have looked at the template code and can't make sense of it. I've looked for documentation for how to create templates like these without much success since I don't know what I'm looking at. Can you point me to a tutorial, or a tutor? Laura1822 (talk) 18:47, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the instructions! I'll give it a try. Laura1822 (talk) 20:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Portraits of the Savoy
editMr. prejudice. I am writing to ask you if you over the Internet still can not upload the portraits of the Savoy Family,, because I recently saw six of his wonderful boots Portraits of King Charles Emmanuel III,, could try to find more?--87.15.94.217 12:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Thanks for creating all the "Paintings of ... by title" categories :) Léna (talk) 09:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC) |
File:Count of Floridablanca by Goya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Spanish duchesses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
File:María Antonia Gonzaga by Goya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Château de Beauregard - Jeanne d'Albret & III of Navarre.jpg
editEcummenic, I noticed your move of this file. You have no comment on the questions I posed to you regarding it? And you thought it would be a good idea to retain the "&" in the filename? --Eric my en.wp talk page 02:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Renaming and overwriting
editHi Ecummenic, your rename of File:Teresa Vallabriga by Goya.jpg is not allowed according to Commons:File renaming. Please don't do such renames in the future. Overwriting artworks like you did at File:Lili Schönemann (1758-1817) Goethes Verlobte.jpg is not allowed. Please upload under a different name. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
edit
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Elisabeth Augusta of Sulzbach by Edlinger?
editHello Ecummenic,
how do you know that File:Edlinger - Elisabeth Augusta of Sulzbach, Alte Pinakothek.jpg is by Johann Georg Edlinger? I ask because it is not listed at https://www.sammlung.pinakothek.de/en/artist/johann-georg-edlinger. Perhaps they have another creator at sammlung.pinakothek.de. Unfortunately, it's hard to find out as a lot of images are missing there. (6 of the 14 results of [2] lack images.)
Thanks in advance, --Marsupium (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC), 17:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
restore files
editHi, Mr. Ecummenic, i am writing to ask you if you could restore some PD files while keeping a recently blocked user, I had tried to do some bugs at the COM: UDR, but without many results, I would ask her if they could do something for some recovery:
--87.14.89.82 15:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.76.230 (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- FYI: Don't worry about this, it's only the longtime abuser A3cb1 whining. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Portrait paintings of men with left hand holding objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Image without license
edit
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Artwork template for artuk.org
editHi, I came across this edit by you. I've made doing this a bit easier for artuk.org by creating a bookmarklet that generates an artwork template for their website. See the script here: User:1Veertje/ArworkRef Vera (talk) 07:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Removal of German description?
editMay I ask why you removed the German language description from File:Portrait of Eleonore Freiin von Münster zur Surenburg, née von Grothaus zur Ledenburg.jpg? --GRuban (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Question
editWhy are you decategorizing portraits from the 1800s? I found at least three where you took them out of 1872 and put them in "1870s portraits" which is down not up. When I looked at your other contributions, I found you've been doing this to a lot of art. Please explain the thought process behind lumping together all these images instead of how they were previously neatly filed? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Gabrielle de Polastron 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
HI dear Ecummenic,
- File:Ritratto di Ferdinando II d'Asburgo.jpg
- File:Ritratto di Raimondo Montecuccoli.jpg
- File:Comte Jean de Werth.png
- File:Ritratto di S.M. Re Vittorio Amedeo III di Savoia.png
- File:Josef Adam of Schwarzenberg.png
- File:Ritratto di Giovan Battista Giovio.jpg
- File:Ritratto di condottiero in armatura.png
- File:Fürst Karl von Isenburg.png
- File:Friedrich August I von Saschen.jpg
- File:Christiane Eberhardine 02.jpg
- File:Portrait of a gentleman01.jpg
- File:Kaiser Franz I von Hasburg.jpg
- File:Kaiser Franz I von Österreich im Ornat des Leopoldsordens.jpg
- File:Bartolomeo degli Oddi.png
- File:Portrait de Ludovico Gonzaga.jpg
- File:Eleonora Piossasco Occelli.png
- File:Portrait of Vittorio Amedeo III.jpg
- File:Duke Charles emmanuel II of savoy.png
- File:Francesco III Caracciolo.jpg
- File:Giovanni Battista Caracciolo.png
- File:Carlo Caracciolo.png
- File:Petraccone I Caracciolo.png
- File:Ferdinando Giovanni Battista Caracciolo.png
- File:Giacomo I Caracciolo.png
- File:Sergianni Caracciolo di Avellino.png
- File:Petracone II Caracciolo.png
- File:Ritratto di Petraccone V Caracciolo.PNG
- File:Ritratto di Margherita di Savoia 01.png
- File:Maria Teresa d'Asburgo.png
I would like to ask you if you can present this list of files to the commond undeletion request, it is a list of portraits and paintings of the era, dating back to 200 years since the death of the various artists, I unfortunately can not apply directly, because it would deleted at the moment, can I ask you please ????--79.31.200.33 19:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Block evasion by A3cb1. @Vituzzu, Elcobbola, Ruthven, and Guanaco: please note. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Collapse
editHi, please don't use {{Collapse}} with the artwork template like you did here. It will cause the information to be hidden, not only at the category page itself, but also at the image description pages. Jcb (talk) 20:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pierre Corneille - Versailles MV 2903.png
editCopyright status: File:Pierre Corneille - Versailles MV 2903.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Corneille - Versailles MV 2903.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Chardin: The Prayer before Meal
editWhen you here added Louvre as institution did you know about this motive in the Louvre, but not about the File:Jean Siméon Chardin - The Prayer before Meal - WGA04770.jpg which seems to be in the Hermitage? Or did you have any other considerations? Judging from the ladle on the lower left I think it is rather identical with (the Hermitage version) File:Jean Siméon Chardin - The Prayer before Meal - WGA04770.jpg. What you think? --Marsupium (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Per Krafft Gustav III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Maria Anna, Archid. Austria (1683-1754).png
editCopyright status: File:Maria Anna, Archid. Austria (1683-1754).png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Anna, Archid. Austria (1683-1754).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Copyright status: File:Ariosto, after - James II of Aragon.png
editCopyright status: File:Ariosto, after - James II of Aragon.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ariosto, after - James II of Aragon.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Dukedoms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Marie Jeanne Baptiste of Savoy-Nemours has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Important message for file movers
editA community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
I see you did quite a few renames that are completely not in line with this policy like for example the rename of File:Stamaty after van Cleve - Eleanor of Austria.jpg, File:François I with Eleanor, Queen of France.jpg. File:Couder - Louis-François-Armand de Vignerot du Plessis, duc de Richelieu (1696-1788).jpg and many more. From Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed?: "Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better." and "A user repeatedly renaming files under invalid reasons can be stripped of the filemover privilege". I already warned you for this back in 2017, but you never replied. Please explain your actions. Multichill (talk) 22:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Given that you never responded and you're still doing renames that are not allowed under our current policy (for example File:Маргарита Гонзага, герцогиня Феррарская.jpg & File:1797 painting of Louis Henri Joseph de Bourbon, last Prince of Condé (1756-1830).jpg), I removed your file move rights. Multichill (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Diane Adélaïde de Simiane, French School of circa 1800.jpg
editWouldn't the lengthy auction-house description be under copyright? Churchh (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Barbette Friedrich IV. - Miniaturen – Bomann Museum.JPG
editHallo Ecummenic, du hast bei o.a. File das Datum vom etwa 1700 auf etwa 1709 geändert. Kannst du bitte mal deine Quelle angeben. Meine Quelle war die Beschreibung im Bomann-Museum. Bis du mir deine Quelle genannt hast werde ich wieder 1700 einsetzen, da ich eine Quelle habe. --Hajotthu (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Schau mal hier [:https://tansey-miniatures.com/en/collection/11105]--Hajotthu (talk) 08:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
hello Ecummenic I am writing to ask you to please overload this portrait, with this link that I am sending you, because the current version you uploaded is too small, in comparison to this one of the link, I have tried more than once to overload the image, but its size creates problems of slowness to my pc, however TITANICALLY large. that's why I ask you for help, it is obvious that in that link you will also find the second portrait of the wife. please do me this favor.
link: https://www.dorotheum.com/fileadmin/lot-images/38A200609/hires/maria-giovanna-clementi-called-la-clementina-6718383.jpg --ßrandërker (talk) 10:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Sardinia
edithi Ecummenic I am writing to ask you if you could do me the favor of uploading these portraits present in the link:
http://www.sardegnacultura.it/documenti/7_93_20080326163502.pdf --37.183.21.241 16:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
19th-century paintings in National Trust places
editMay I ask why this particular structure was decided on? Was their any consensus taken? Seems unnecessarily complicated and prone to the dangers of over diffusion... -- Broichmore (talk) 12:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- So I can undo it then? Broichmore (talk) 16:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:German School (18) - Portrait of a Woman with a Fan.png
editCopyright status: File:German School (18) - Portrait of a Woman with a Fan.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:German School (18) - Portrait of a Woman with a Fan.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Maria Amalia, Duchess of Zweibrücken - Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen.png
editCopyright status: File:Maria Amalia, Duchess of Zweibrücken - Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Amalia, Duchess of Zweibrücken - Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:König - Lady with Mask - Tansey Collection.png
editCopyright status: File:König - Lady with Mask - Tansey Collection.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:König - Lady with Mask - Tansey Collection.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Presumed portrait of Eleonor Gonzaga, misidentified with Anna von Sachsen-Coburg.png
editCopyright status: File:Presumed portrait of Eleonor Gonzaga, misidentified with Anna von Sachsen-Coburg.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Presumed portrait of Eleonor Gonzaga, misidentified with Anna von Sachsen-Coburg.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
save, mi faresti la cortesia di sovrcaricare questo ritratto con questa versione più grande??
https://wannenesgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/cssas/lotimages/hd/1607_0198_8975_nc.jpg
--Yelnry (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:After Gotthelf Leberecht Glaeser - Christian Landgrraf von Hessen.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:After Gotthelf Leberecht Glaeser - Christian Landgrraf von Hessen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:German School - So-called portrait of Emperor Joseph I.png
editCopyright status: File:German School - So-called portrait of Emperor Joseph I.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:German School - So-called portrait of Emperor Joseph I.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Follower of Drouais - Portrait of a young boy as Cupid, traditionally identified as Charles de Bourbon, Duc de Berry.png
editCopyright status: File:Follower of Drouais - Portrait of a young boy as Cupid, traditionally identified as Charles de Bourbon, Duc de Berry.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Follower of Drouais - Portrait of a young boy as Cupid, traditionally identified as Charles de Bourbon, Duc de Berry.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Anonymous-German (18) - Frederick the Great.png
editCopyright status: File:Anonymous-German (18) - Frederick the Great.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Anonymous-German (18) - Frederick the Great.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pierre Mignard - Marie-Anne Mancini, Princess Colonna - Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Agen.png
editCopyright status: File:Pierre Mignard - Marie-Anne Mancini, Princess Colonna - Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Agen.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Mignard - Marie-Anne Mancini, Princess Colonna - Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Agen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:J. Bralle - Portrait de dame le buste orné d 'un bouquet de fleurs.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:J. Bralle - Portrait de dame le buste orné d 'un bouquet de fleurs.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mademoiselle de Blois duchesse d’Orléans.png
editCopyright status: File:Mademoiselle de Blois duchesse d’Orléans.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mademoiselle de Blois duchesse d’Orléans.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Henri Gascars - Portrait of Hortense Mancini, Duchess of Mazarin.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Henri Gascars - Portrait of Hortense Mancini, Duchess of Mazarin.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Portrait en buste d'une Princesse de France.png
editCopyright status: File:Portrait en buste d'une Princesse de France.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait en buste d'une Princesse de France.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Portrait présumé de Louise-Françoise de Bourbon, dite Mademoiselle de Nantes.png
editCopyright status: File:Portrait présumé de Louise-Françoise de Bourbon, dite Mademoiselle de Nantes.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait présumé de Louise-Françoise de Bourbon, dite Mademoiselle de Nantes.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Suite de neuf portraits de membres de la famille royale de France - Portrait d'une princesse 1.png
editCopyright status: File:Suite de neuf portraits de membres de la famille royale de France - Portrait d'une princesse 1.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Suite de neuf portraits de membres de la famille royale de France - Portrait d'une princesse 1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ritratto di dama, ovale.png
editCopyright status: File:Ritratto di dama, ovale.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ritratto di dama, ovale.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sophie Caroline von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel.png
editCopyright status: File:Sophie Caroline von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sophie Caroline von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:École Française - Portrait de jeune femme portant une lettre.png
editCopyright status: File:École Française - Portrait de jeune femme portant une lettre.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:École Française - Portrait de jeune femme portant une lettre.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Maria Teresa Cibo d’Este, principessa ereditaria di Modena.png
editCopyright status: File:Maria Teresa Cibo d’Este, principessa ereditaria di Modena.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Teresa Cibo d’Este, principessa ereditaria di Modena.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Franz Conrad Löhr - Portrait of a lady, 1793.png
editCopyright status: File:Franz Conrad Löhr - Portrait of a lady, 1793.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Franz Conrad Löhr - Portrait of a lady, 1793.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Roslin - Maire-Amélie Joséphine, archiduchesse d'Autriche, duchesse de Parme - Louvre.png
editCopyright status: File:Roslin - Maire-Amélie Joséphine, archiduchesse d'Autriche, duchesse de Parme - Louvre.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Roslin - Maire-Amélie Joséphine, archiduchesse d'Autriche, duchesse de Parme - Louvre.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:École française - Louis XIV de France, pair.png
editCopyright status: File:École française - Louis XIV de France, pair.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:École française - Louis XIV de France, pair.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Louis Armand, Prince of Conti, miniature - Musée Condé.png
editCopyright status: File:Louis Armand, Prince of Conti, miniature - Musée Condé.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Louis Armand, Prince of Conti, miniature - Musée Condé.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Louis XVI of France as Dauphin.png
editCopyright status: File:Louis XVI of France as Dauphin.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Louis XVI of France as Dauphin.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Workshop of François de Troy - Allegory of the Four Seasons (1).png
editCopyright status: File:Workshop of François de Troy - Allegory of the Four Seasons (1).png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Workshop of François de Troy - Allegory of the Four Seasons (1).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Sir_Thomas_Godsalve_and_His_Son_John_(Hans_Holbein_der_Jüngere_-_Gemäldegalerie_Alte_Meister)
edit
Category:Sir_Thomas_Godsalve_and_His_Son_John_(Hans_Holbein_der_Jüngere_-_Gemäldegalerie_Alte_Meister) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Copyright status: File:Follower of Pierre Mignard - Portrait of a young man in armor.png
editCopyright status: File:Follower of Pierre Mignard - Portrait of a young man in armor.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Follower of Pierre Mignard - Portrait of a young man in armor.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
could you overload this file ?? I tried, but unfortunately the file is too heavy for me since it is a 3000x4000 file--Erkerßranderker (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ulrica Louisa, Landgräfin von Hessen-Homburg.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Ulrica Louisa, Landgräfin von Hessen-Homburg.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ulrica Louisa, Landgräfin von Hessen-Homburg.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:François de Troy - Henri-Jacques Nompar de Caumont, duc de La Force en manteau ducal.jpg
editCopyright status: File:François de Troy - Henri-Jacques Nompar de Caumont, duc de La Force en manteau ducal.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:François de Troy - Henri-Jacques Nompar de Caumont, duc de La Force en manteau ducal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jean Ducayer - Charlotte Marguerite Gabrielle de Montmorency.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Jean Ducayer - Charlotte Marguerite Gabrielle de Montmorency.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jean Ducayer - Charlotte Marguerite Gabrielle de Montmorency.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Attributed to Petitot - So-called portrait of Marie d'Orléans, duchesse de Longueville - Louvre.png
editCopyright status: File:Attributed to Petitot - So-called portrait of Marie d'Orléans, duchesse de Longueville - Louvre.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Attributed to Petitot - So-called portrait of Marie d'Orléans, duchesse de Longueville - Louvre.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dryander - Auguste Wilhelmine of Hesse-Darmstadt - Historisches Museum der Pfalz.png
editCopyright status: File:Dryander - Auguste Wilhelmine of Hesse-Darmstadt - Historisches Museum der Pfalz.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dryander - Auguste Wilhelmine of Hesse-Darmstadt - Historisches Museum der Pfalz.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jean Petitit - So-called portrait of Elisabeth d'Orléans - Louvre.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jean Petitit - So-called portrait of Elisabeth d'Orléans - Louvre.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Vittoria della Rovere's portraits
editHello Ecummenic. I saw that in the last months you uploaded a lot of portraits (sure and presumed) of Vittoria della Rovere. About the last one, the auction house has recently updated its description (and now it's openly recognized as her portrait, if you want to update info on Commons). I saw that of course you usually refer to the attribution proposed by the auction houses or the museums, and then you had your correct "presumed" identification. In the specific case of Vittoria, a long and very detailed article has been published a year ago on the scientific review Atti e Studi - Accademia Raffello. I have the PDF if you want it (but it's in Italian, I don't know your languages). Auction houses are often incorrect (accidentally, or voluntary if they want to sell "better" a painting), while the online museums catalogs are not at all updated. For example most part of the datasheet of the Catalogo Generale dei Beni Culturali have been written by stagiaires between 1980s and 2000s, and even if a lot of portraits (incorrectly identified) have been in the meantime correctly studied by art historians and published in reviews and exhibition catalogs, the datasheet is not updated... (actually I think just because they have to pay people to do it!). But thanks for your work, I'm glad to see that there's someone on Commons to categorize that big mess :) --Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 08:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ecummenic: looking at the history of the category, and at the result now after linking to wikidata, I am convinced this is not the correct image at King George I (1660–1727) wearing Garter robes (Q52146830)? Would you consider adding the correct image? Thanks Lotje (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The category needs its own page on wikidata as the other is for the portrait at Belton House in the National Trust Ecummenic (talk) 00:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ecummenic, since you uploaded this file, I reach out to you with File:Catalogue of the Ehrich Galleries collection of valuable paintings - by the masters of the classic Italian, Dutch, Flemish, English, Spanish, and French schools (1905) (14777804984).jpg image, with, as per the description given in the file should be Catherine-Marguerite Mignard (Q64873650). Rather confusing now. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Also this painting now. Lotje (talk) 17:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's not clear who is represented in these portraits, but it appears that [3], [4] and [5] are portraits of at least two different women, and it is unlikely that the sitter is Catherine Mignard as they bear little resemblance to a portrait of her located in the palace of Versailles [6] Ecummenic (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Ecummenic, in the meantime I correcte some spelling mistakes. there must have been a reason why a trustworthy Ehrich Galleries (Q105698482) mentions this. I'll leave it as it is and try to find more information. Have a nice day. Lotje (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Back in town :-) On page 62 of this book, there is another painting by Pierre Mignard with a portrait of Catherine-Marguerite Mignard. Looks like the sitter has many faces. Cheers Lotje (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: Mignard. — Catherine Mignard, Comtesse de Feuquières Lotje (talk) 11:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Back in town :-) On page 62 of this book, there is another painting by Pierre Mignard with a portrait of Catherine-Marguerite Mignard. Looks like the sitter has many faces. Cheers Lotje (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Ecummenic, in the meantime I correcte some spelling mistakes. there must have been a reason why a trustworthy Ehrich Galleries (Q105698482) mentions this. I'll leave it as it is and try to find more information. Have a nice day. Lotje (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's not clear who is represented in these portraits, but it appears that [3], [4] and [5] are portraits of at least two different women, and it is unlikely that the sitter is Catherine Mignard as they bear little resemblance to a portrait of her located in the palace of Versailles [6] Ecummenic (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Giacomo Antonio Curlando
edithi @Ecummenic
could you upload this painting please??
I can't try because I don't have such precise frame cropping programs as you have Volvos12 (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
"Ambito" ?
editWhen you used the word "ambito" here, I'm reasonably confident you meant "circle", as in "someone from the artist's general social circle" (which is one of the valid parameters of template:Creator). Can you confirm that? DS (talk) 15:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- "Ambito" is the term used on the website where the image came from (no longer visible today), as I was not sure if it was the equivalent of "circle" or "follower", I put the word used by the seller. Ecummenic (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Catherine II the Legislatress in the Temple Devoted to the Goddess of Justice (Levitsky)
editHello Ecummenic, since you created the category, I was wondering if you could adapt the spelling: there is a d missing in the word Goddess. Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, that's right, thanks for letting me know. Ecummenic (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Ecummenic, since you created this category, I am a bit puzzled here because of John Condé (Q6226844) Pierre Conde (Q18674354). Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Only me again, there is also a Pierre Conde (Q109482469) :-) Lotje (talk) 05:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Jean and Pierre are brothers, but wikidata editors have placed Jean's data in Pierre's file. Jean, engraver, was born around the year 1765 and died in 1794; his brother Pierre, engraver, miniaturist and publisher, was born around 1767 and died in 1840 [7] [8]. Pierre Conde and Peter Conde are the same person so both wikidata pages should be merged. Ecummenic (talk) 06:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Y're a star, thank you so much for clarifying this Ecummenic. Much obliged. Lotje (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikidata items are merged, but surely not all the images in the Category:Peter Condé are correct. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Y're a star, thank you so much for clarifying this Ecummenic. Much obliged. Lotje (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Jean and Pierre are brothers, but wikidata editors have placed Jean's data in Pierre's file. Jean, engraver, was born around the year 1765 and died in 1794; his brother Pierre, engraver, miniaturist and publisher, was born around 1767 and died in 1840 [7] [8]. Pierre Conde and Peter Conde are the same person so both wikidata pages should be merged. Ecummenic (talk) 06:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Ecummenic. This change you made added incorrect categories. That painting shows Catherine of Alexandria, not Catherine of Siena. You can see that on the museum's website. For future reference, Catherine of Siena is usually shown as a nun. Catherine of Alexandria is usually shown as a younger woman, more like the one in this painting. I've fixed the categories on this file. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Ecummenic. I'm not sure I understand why this file needs to contain categories that are already on the category for the painting. I don't understand what you mean by "For diffusion it's necessary that the main image contains all categories." Would you mind explaining? I make that kind of change often, so if there's a reason not to I'd like to understand it. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, when all the images of a given work of art are placed within a very specific category, access to them is complicated, both for visitors and for editors. Specific categories avoid the saturation of images in the general categories, but the works also disappear from the general view. Ecummenic (talk) 06:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- If the works need to be in a general view, a gallery is the way to do that. An image of a painting like this one does not need to be in the same categories as the main category for the painting per COM:OVERCAT. I'm going to remove those categories again; please do not put them back. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- A gallery is something useless, no one sees them anymore, except the one who edited them. Ecummenic (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- If the works need to be in a general view, a gallery is the way to do that. An image of a painting like this one does not need to be in the same categories as the main category for the painting per COM:OVERCAT. I'm going to remove those categories again; please do not put them back. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)