Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vamps!

-- 19:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments!

edit
  WLM super uploader
Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- Effeietsanders (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa peahoone, 1831-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 16:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa köök, 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The clock tower is still leaning a bit after correction, but QI nevertheless.please correct the spot un the sky...--Jebulon 00:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinna Meremeeste Kodu, 1926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Never use a higher ISO than you need (higher ISO is more noise). You do not need IS0 400 when shooting in daylight. The colors are great, composition is good, but the picture has a lot of noise (quite unnecessarily). Some noise in the sky is usually okay here, if the picture is otherwise sharp (but it's too much here IMO).--ArildV 16:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Have you seen current PotD (FP) File:Leeds Castle, Kent, England 3 - May 09.jpg? --Sfu 14:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Denoised sky, panoramic image->the individual images are downsampled->less visible noise. Or should I put my Nikon D80 at ISO1600 the next time I shoot in daylight? Also a big difference between EOS 400D and EOS 50D. But the point (and that we judge) is the image quality, and it is too much noise. And I am convinced that it could have been avoided with different settings. Regards--ArildV 14:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Nikon D80 at IS0100 File:Styckekranen och torpedverkstaden september 2011.jpg (much less noise, no noise reduction). Nikon D80 and EOS400D have similar resolution and similar noise levels.--ArildV 14:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC) for me ist is QI. --Ralf Roletschek 16:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

edit
  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Vamps,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg

edit
 
File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naissaare kitsarööpmeline raudtee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse 2012

edit

Fotovõistlus Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse toimub ka sel aastal. Pilte saab lisada septembrikuu lõpuni. Oled oodatud osalema! --WikedKentaur (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niitvälja raba Keila-Paldiski raudtee ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Iifar 17:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

FoP Latvia

edit

Hello, I'd really appreciate it very much if you create ONE deletion request page for the FoP in Latvia (as I did here) instead of creating one for each picture, since the argument is the same for them all and I don't need the same message 100 times in my page. Thanks and regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, after you took care that all my pictures of Vanšu tilts are gone, I'd like to ask you why were there exclusively only picture of my authorship, whereas in the project there are many others and even a category for the bridge. The FoP does not apply there?. I agree that we have to attach to our policies but it is the first time that I see that they are author-centered instead of subject-centered. Maybe there is a reason for that. Regards, Poco a poco (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Paisley Abbey

edit

What are your thoughts, FP wise, on File:Paisley Abbey from the south east.jpg? -- Colin (talk) 08:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umgebindehaus in Dittersbach, Böhmische Schweiz, Tschechien.JPG. You wrote: "perspective distortion, strong NR, oversharpened". I answered: "Thank you, Vamps, I made a better update. Please check it. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)". Please have a look to this image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Featured picture candidates

edit

Igaks juhuks mainin, et esitasin 2 sinu fotot eeskujulike piltide kandidaatideks. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mukri raba 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Tallinna kunstihoone, 1934.a., 1961.jpg

edit
 
File:Tallinna kunstihoone, 1934.a., 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.131.126.74 15:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Tallinn, tuletõrjehoone Raua 2, 1938-1939.jpg

edit
 
File:Tallinn, tuletõrjehoone Raua 2, 1938-1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.131.126.74 15:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

edit

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted

edit

File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted by Missvain for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Põllküla raudteepeatus.jpg

edit
 
File:Põllküla raudteepeatus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Tallinn, elamu Väike-Karja 1 - Sauna 1, 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply