Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/02

1 June 2024

3 June 2024

Deletion requests on 2 June 2024

June 2

File:מחזיקה לראשונה את ספרי השביעי.jpg

Is it an own work? 186.172.201.2 00:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep , mark it with "no permission" if you dont sure. i believe it is not copyvio because this image is only exist in here. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 10:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring actor Raj Kapoor

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

GaiusAugustine (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the films were shown in USA, then they are OK. For URAA, you have to prove that these files are affected. So if you give evidence that the films were NOT shown in USA, then this is a valid request. Yann (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring actor Madhubala

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

GaiusAugustine (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring actor Dev Anand

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

GaiusAugustine (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:It Boy.ogg

This is not the anthem of Canada, as stated in the description, but something unknown, taken from somewhere unknown. 95.55.219.29 08:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lmaoo stfu nerd 45.88.210.103 00:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bbno made the new canada anthem fr 45.88.210.103 00:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he cooked 45.88.210.103 00:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring actor Nutan

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

GaiusAugustine (talk) 08:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The 1995 Tap-in device by Jensen was devised facing the user to avoid twisting of the wrist. It would adapt across all mobile phone and watch brands.jpg

This is a sketch by Geir Jensen (https://www.digi.no/artikler/apple-klokka-ble-egentlig-designet-i-norge-for-20-ar-siden/197825), not the own work of the uploader. It doesn't seem to be part of a public domain patent application or anything like that. Belbury (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As it appears vialink to the magazine article in Norwegian: The invention was sumbitted to the national competition on innovations invited by Innovation Norway. Therefore it could not be patent applied and submitted by hand-drawings and extensive text instead. The IN Board rejected it, so no more information was made since. Jensen got aware of Apple Watch in 2015 and found it amusing. Editors included drawing to article. This is evident from the magazine and paper covering the story.

I therefore find it relevant to keep file as is.

Rationale: It is relevant to Wikipedia for the fact innovation was conceived, was feasible (Bluetooth published previous year), and described as one haptic technology historic event.

(The fact that it was rejected, by the board of the national innovation organization, because it was beyond imagination at the time, is an amusing fact, but that is not mentioned in Wikipedia either). Robust Sense (talk) 07:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is Commons, the only question is whether it's correct for Commons to announce to the world that the image is freely licenced.

From the description you give above, it sounds as if Geir Jensen would still hold the copyright to his drawing. If the drawing is very relevant to a Wikipedia article, it could be hosted on that Wikipedia project under fair use. Belbury (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:German soldiers' grave.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Finland for sculptures and the photo violates sculptors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per d:Q105621886, the authors of this 1920 monument in Helsinki are Finnish sculptor en:Gunnar Finne (1886–1952) and Finnish architect en:Johan Sigfrid Sirén (1889–1961). A 1920 work is in the public domain in the US, and Finne's works are in the public domain in Finland. What exactly did Sirén contribute to this monument? Can it be seen in the photograph? --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:German Finnish Civil War memorial - Old Church Park - Helsinki - DSC03783.JPG shows another view of this monument. Sirén's contribution may just be the steps (or the plinth, however you want to call it) beneath the actual monument. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring various Indian film artists post-1945

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

GaiusAugustine (talk) 09:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nb: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dilip_Kumar_greets_Khan_Abdul_Ghaffar_Khan_at_Meenambakkam_Airport,_Chennai_(c._1960).jpg is not a film still. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 23:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its not about film stills, but about the license used. GaiusAugustine (talk) 08:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Léopard de Barbarie (Panthera Pardus Panthera), 1890 Kabylie, Algérie.jpg

Hoax and false image 2A01:CB08:8EB:7100:29F9:FCA4:BD9F:ECD 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the basis for the claim? —Tcr25 (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note the image was previously kept at DR as a 1930s postcard. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in public domain featuring actor Meena Kumari

Post-1945 images (photos/film stills) from India, which were certainly still in copyright in India at the URAA cut-off date of 1996. Therefore their US term was extended until 95 years after their first publication.

These files subsequently went on to be in public domain in India, since the expiration of copyright in India is 50 years for work published before 1958 (which means, files dating from 1946 to 1957 came in public domain in India from 1996 to 2007) and 60 years for work published from 1958 (which means, files published in 1958 came in public domain in India from 2018, those published in 1959, from 2019 and so on) BUT they continue to be under copyright in the US, since the duration for copyright in the US is of 95 years since the date of publication. Files from India from the year 1946, can only be in public domain in the US from 2042, by earliest)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GaiusAugustine (talk • contribs) 18:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the films were shown in USA, then they are OK. For URAA, you have to prove that these files are affected. So if you give evidence that the films were NOT shown in USA, then this is a valid request. Yann (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Yann. Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 12:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Manfrombongo (talk · contribs)

maps without sources

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 11:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the source. Manfrombongo (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Modern primat Can you take off the deletion request? Thanks Manfrombongo (talk) 12:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Manfrombongo File:Map of the Pala Empire during the 'Kambojia Conquests'.png is still unsourced. and an admin will take care of this request. thank you. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 12:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you add a source then? Im pretty sure I added in a source but your saying I didn't? Manfrombongo (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adrianjmatosfotodewikipedia.jpg

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Borgo San Dalmazzo-Stemma (versione di ashoppio).svg

there is a better version Ashoppio (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oscar ivanissevich sentado.png

Images published in Argentine magazine Puntal in 1975. They are in the public domain in their country of origin (25 years after publication), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, thy are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep these files. Günther Frager (talk) 13:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Menendez-1984.jpg

File:Luciano Benjamín Menéndez.jpg

Photo published in the Argentine newspaper Clarín in August 22, 1984. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still protected by copyright in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keept this image. Günther Frager (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad Mosadegh Hossein Fatemy.jpg

This photograph was taken in 1951 in the United States, and is available at Bettmann Archive. Unless we don't have a proof that it was created by an Iranian photographer, we cannot claim that PD-Iran applies (the photographer is unknown). HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Female-masturbation-electric-massager.ogv

age not clear 70.182.111.140 03:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At the end of the movie there is a statemet that the model is at least 18 years old and the records keeper and copyrightholder is [eroca.blog105.fc2-com]. Unless the ip as undeniable prooofs that this statements are forged. Tm (talk) 04:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason to doubt age assertion of uploader. The uploader identifies themselves as a "record keeper", suggesting that they are aware of their obligations and requirements under 2257. Moreover, this movie has already been undeleted, and no concerns were voiced about age at that time. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. --Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 07:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female-masturbation-electric-massager.ogv

The cited source contains no clear indication (at least to a non-Japanese reader) that this file is freely licensed. It does contain a copyright notice, at the bottom, which says ‘all rights reserved’.

Starting a regular deletion request because this file is old and in use at:

The end of the video does contain some on-screen text: a statement that the model is at least 18 years old (mentioned above) and a statement that the video is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL 1.2. This information is unverified, as far as I know, and contradicts the file description (which says CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL 1.2+). Brianjd (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ardalanshahgholi (talk · contribs)

Files with uncertain copyright status. About the historical photographs of the famous 1953 trial of Mohammad Mossadegh: This event was photographed by perhaps dozens pf photojournalists, from Iran and abroad. Those taken by Iranians are almost certainly in the public domain while those taken by foreigners have an uncertain copyright status. For example, took many photographs for Life magazine, which are still copyrighted by Time Inc. in the United States. I I think we should upload such files with due diligence.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural cacerolazo.JPG

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D works in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gharouni (talk · contribs)

Photographs involve work from Henk Sprenger (died in 2005). Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Netherlands, these should be protected until 2076.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep these are not even full pages any books and just partial part of a page (sample) to compare the origins of the story with the Persian translation of the story that was published in a Farsi language childrenn magazine more than 40 years ago. Some files are only copies of the English and Persian translations with partial pictures (samples) to compare the origins with the translations. These files have been used in an Farsi language article in wikifa about the origins of the story that was printed in an older than 45 years children magazine published in Iran. The article is not about Henk Springer or his books but refers to them. I tried to put only partial pictures as samples only not full pages. Gharouni (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gharouni You can upload the files locally under fair use. These photographs are clearly derivative works and Henk Sprenger holds the copyright for the original work. Also, de minimis does not apply to this case. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horacio Massaccesi 1995.png

It is not possible to verify the CC-BY claim. The source Youtube video is no longer available and there is no archived version. Günther Frager (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kenya 50 Shilling banknote, front.jpg

The copyright claim is invalid. The uploader did not create this work but merely made a digital copy of it without any additional art. JMF (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to "Scanned from original source". I am a new to editing so let me know if this is appropriate or should be changed. Jlewistexas (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rar bgardeshgari.svg

protected logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:China Zorrilla Antonio Gasalla Esperando la carroza.jpg

File:Esperando la carroza2.jpg

Still frame of the Argentine movie Esperando la Carroza published in 1985. The image might be in the public domain in Argentina (25 years after publication), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmed Maalaoui.jpg

Il s'agit de ma photo personnelle, merci de la supprimer. Membreadherent (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustavo Bazterrica.JPG

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charly y la maquina de hacer pajaros 2.jpg as this file is a cropped version of the deleted one. Günther Frager (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De La Rúa saludando.png

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo appeared in the front page of Argentine newspaper Clarín in August 7, 1996. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention.

Converting to DR since it is PD in Argentina, but not the US (where it won't be PD until at least 2092). Abzeronow (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per COM:L all files need to have a free license in the US (or be in the public domain). The US joined the Berne Convention in March 1, 1989, so any publication, like this photo, is automatically covered by US copyright (70 pma). The protection in the US is uncertain since Rubén Dubrovsky, the photographer[1], is still alive. Günther Frager (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be protected until 70 years after the death of the photographer. So we'd need VRT permission from Dubrovsky to host it now on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos Jáuregui revista Siete Días.png

Front cover of Argentine magazine Siete Días published in 1984. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shah US visit.jpg

Photograph taken in the United States, creator unknown. No reason to assume PD-Iran as the licesnse. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:J. Dean.jpg

This is a 1950s studio portrait of James Dean. The photo licence, source and author information surely are not correct. It's the only upload by the user. SeptemberWoman (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AfroCreatives WikiProject+Film 2024 au Bénin 13.jpg

Image de mauvaise qualité, floue Saliousoft (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GustavusSwift1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Cabayi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: metadata includes an assertion of copyright Yann (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Painter is Ralph Clarkson, so there's a chance this is already in the public domain. Some people just don't understand the meaning of "own work". -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singapore coat of arms.svg

Alleged replication of a copyrighted official rendition, according to repeated reversion at enwiki: [2], [3]. Compare File:Coat of arms of Singapore.svg. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are making yourself look a little silly. You are free to compare the orignal coat of arms and the replication and it is not a 1:1 copy. Irregardless, if Singapore's coat of arm is deleted, the same treatment must be applied to all other national emblems/coat of arms uploaded here. FYI the Singaporean government does not provide any official SVG files for it coat of arms and I created the SVG file.

A simple quick search shows coat of arms uploaded in 2010 for the United Kingdom declared as his "own work" by the user called "SodaCan". The similar story goes for Malaysia, India and many more countries, whose national emblems/coat of arms are uploaded here. I reiterate that the same treatment must be applied to all countries media here. SecretSquirrel78 (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you rely on the written description of the coat of arms to create this rendition? Per COM:COA: the blazon is not protected by copyright, but renditions of a coat of arms are copyrightable. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you rely on the written description (the "blazon") of the coat of arms to create this rendition? –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Are you going to put up deletion request for many other national coat of arms/emblems for deletion as well which are obviously direct copies? Uniform treatment must be applied to all. SecretSquirrel78 (talk) 06:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For those who are interested in comparing this version, here is the official emblazon, which is under copyright. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this image was copied from a file hosted on Wikipedia called Singapore Parliament logo.svg which is copyrighted. Colohisto (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This appears to be a spillover of a dispute on enwiki and possibly a retaliatory nomination. Closer is advised to take care. Stifle (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under Singapore's National Symbols Act with effect on 1 August 2023, distortion or modification of the design of the State Crest and Presidential Crest will not be allowed. I have removed the distorted version.

I will nominate the modified version to be deleted very soon. SecretSquirrel78 (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laws of Singapore do not apply on Commons. Stifle (talk) 08:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesar-mscetti-con-magdalena-ruiz L3HDBNiT6 0x750 1.jpg

Photograph published apparently in 1992 in Argentina (the source in the page is not very precise). It is likely in the public domain in Argentina (25 years after publication), but it is still protected in the US due to Berne Convention. To keep this file we need an VRT ticket. Günther Frager (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portal RaúlMG 20201014 233859.jpg

Photo taken from a book published in Argentina in 1988. The photo is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jil Wiki.JPG

Old file, not properly licensed. The musician admits photographer is someone else and claims owning the copyright. Then she uploads it as own work. Probably all in good faith, not sure. Wait a week for explanations then close as keep if you wish. 186.172.16.70 19:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These statements seem very much to be false excuses, obviosly someone WANTS to delete it just so. All entries are correct. I do own the copyright of the photos. I should wait for the real explanation why anyone wants to delete a correct information about my music and data. Jil Y. Creek (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Langenbach (Langenweißbach).png

Fantasiewappen? Oder offizielles Ortswappen? Demnach gleich zwei Fragen: Urheberrecht? Out of scope? GerritR (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dargestellt ist das offizielle Wappen (siehe Website der Gemeinde). Erstellt wurde die Grafik durch bloßes Abzeichnen einer in der reellen Welt existierenden Darstellung des Wappens mit einem digitalen Grafikprogramm. LuckyLinkDE (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das scheinen eher pseudoheraldische PR-Symbole zu sein, die nicht per se gemeinfrei sind. Die Abzeichnung wäre dann ein Derivat eines geschützten Werks. GerritR (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen von Woltersdorf-Knack.png

Wie alle Wappen der Woltersdorf-Gruppe handelt es sich um die Erfindung eines Vereins. Out of scope. GerritR (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto-de-Perfil-Kristopher.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foto-de-Perfil-Kristopher.png Kristopherjafeth (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leyden battery label.jpg

A photograph of modern museum display notes, there is enough creative text depicted that this is a COM:DW of what we have to assume is copyrighted text. Hog Farm (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This caption is from the Benjamin Franklin Museum, which is run by the US National Park Service. This would put the caption into the public domain per {{PD-USGov-NPS}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anna d.jpg

anna dellermalm died in 2019, so the pic can't be a selfie from 2024... Xocolatl (talk) 21:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

zdjęcie nie zostało wykonane w 2024 roku i pochodzi z archiwum rodzinnego, kiedy Anna jeszcze żyła Annadellermalm (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sybil Ludington statue, Offner museum.JPG

There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the United States, we would need more information about the age and provenance of the underlying sculpture in order to be able to keep this. Hog Farm (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Created by Anna Hyatt Huntington who died in 1973. It's a smaller reproduction of a larger statue in Carmel, NY which was erected before her death. This can be safely kept per {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Dance of Life 1929.ogv

redundant due to File:The Dance of Life, 1929.ogv (or not?). More duplicate films videos should be deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use, in scope, the other file is in a different format. You won't save any disk space by deleting this file. Multichill (talk) 22:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's redundant. It's not even a different format, both are ogv but that also is not an argument (especially so on a site that frequently DR-censors useful images, e.g. just because they were made using an AI tool). Prototyperspective (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meet john doe 512kb.webm

redundant due to File:Meet John Doe (1941).webm and File:Meet John Doe (1941).webm. More duplicate films videos should be deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use, in scope, the other file is in a different format. You won't save any disk space by deleting this file. Multichill (talk) 22:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's redundant. It's not even a different format, all three (second links should be File:Meet John Doe.webm) are webm but that also is not an argument (especially so on a site that frequently DR-censors useful images, e.g. just because they were made using an AI tool). Your argument doesn't make sense and this isn't about (or only about) disk space but also e.g. cluttering of pages. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being upset about one policy isn't a justification to arbitrarily push back on another policy. Just because something is out of scope doesn't mean that you have been censored. We have good reasons to try to avoid completely redundant duplication of content. grendel|khan 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's focus on this DR. There are now three webms of the same film. Two are redundant and here only one is nominated. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Goat.webm

redundant due to the larger and longer File:The Goat (1921) by Buster Keaton and Malcolm St. Clair.webm. More duplicate films videos should be deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in use, in scope, the other file is in a different format. You won't save any disk space by deleting this file. Multichill (talk) 22:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's redundant. It's not even a different format, all two are webm file but that also is not an argument (especially so on a site that frequently DR-censors useful images, e.g. just because they were made using an AI tool). Your argument doesn't make sense and this isn't about (or only about) disk space but also e.g. cluttering of pages. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raymond Carver (1988 author portrait - Where I'm Calling From).jpg

This photo initially appeared in the first edition of the book Where I'm Calling From: New & Selected Stories. Notice that there are two "first editions". The "first trade edition" published by The Atlantic Monthly and the "first signed edition" published by The Franklin Library. The rationale to claim that image is in the public domain is that it appears in the dust jacket of the first trade edition without any copyright notice. However, looking in the page with the cataloging information [4] it states that it was simultaneously published in Canada and therefore we must also respect the Canadian copyright term (70 pma). Another problem is that the photo also appears on the first signed edition in a leaflet with the required copyright notice [5][6]. Günther Frager (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original uploader. What Günther Frager has found is pretty unimpeachable evidence of copyright protection that slipped by me. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 02:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim simonsson ett stycke himmel.jpg

Derivative work of Ett stycke himmel, sculpture by Finnish visual artist Kim Simonsson (Wikidata:Q11871504), born 1974, living. Not in PD. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, only buildings. Htm (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 Kherson-Mykolaiv Offensive.png

Concerns on English Wikipedia this file contains original research and has no verifiable sources. In short, a map that may not be true. WeatherWriter (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unio crassus petra lindholm.jpg

Derivative work of Unio crassus, fountain sculpure in Raseborg, Finland by Finnish visual artist Petra Lindholm (Wikidata:Q4962840),born 1973, living. Artwork unveiled in 2015. Not in PD. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, only buildings. Htm (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/02

June 2

Files in public domain featuring actor Raj Kapoor

Files in public domain featuring actor Madhubala

Files in public domain featuring actor Dev Anand

Files in public domain featuring actor Nutan

Files in public domain featuring various Indian film artists post-1945

Files in public domain featuring actor Meena Kumari

Files uploaded by Manfrombongo (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ardalanshahgholi (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Gharouni (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search