Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/21

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep a quick search showed postcards of the "Skunk Train" using the skunk character at least back to the 1960s. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for interior works in Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ː These are miscellaneous pictures. So FoP doesnt apply. --Tangopaso (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 04:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are cartoon characters in the photo, most likely copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 05:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Astrinko, thanks for your concern.

I work for the company that has the rights for this cartoon. I was asked to update the logo, as a really older one was been used here.

Also, this particular image is used on our press kit, and is wildly available on the web and media portals.

If needed, I can provide documentations proving my affiliation to the company.

Regards! Diogogcarv (talk) 10:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diogogcarv if you have permission for the upload, then it's best to go through the process of COM:VRT. Nakonana (talk) 11:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there @Nakonana,

Thanks for the heads-up. Just sent them an email.

Regards! Diogogcarv (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diogogcarv please also note that the previously used image was used under a non-free license — I'm guessing — "Fair Use"; see pt:Ficheiro:Mundo Bita.jpeg. The CC license on Commons grants a lot of freedom in reusing the image. Your company should probably check whether they'd prefer to upload a local file to the Portuguese Wiki under a Fair Use rationale instead of uploading File:MB2024.jpg to Commons under a CC license. Nakonana (talk) 12:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NakonanaHow can i upload it to the Brazilian Wiki? I'm new here and found it quite confusing. I would be glad if you can give me some guidance on it.

Regards! Diogogcarv (talk) 12:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diogogcarv it's possible that an admin here (or someone from the VRT?) could handle this for you, but I'm not sure if that's correct.

Otherwise, it looks like you need to go to https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Carregar_ficheiro and then select the "É uma obra de outra origem" option. This will lead you to a page, where you find a link at the bottom half of the page that says "carregue aqui". You click "aqui" and follow the instructions from. I can't guide you any further because I don't have the required user rights on Portuguese wiki to get to the actual upload form. Nakonana (talk) 13:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ticket:2024082210007928 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers form Argentine singer Celeste Carballo published during the 1980s. They are currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, they are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep them.

• File:Mevuelvocadadiamasloca1982.jpg
• File:Mivozrenaceracece83.jpg
• File:Sandra celeste mucho masque dos.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author request Wosdamm (talk) 06:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is 2 years old and license revocation is not possible. The recent requests of Special:ListFiles/Wosdamm show that one should be very restrictive with incoming pictures of cocks. Some years later the same user comes back and begs for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This year the European Championships as multi sport event was not a thing, so "European championships in 2024" should suffice. FakirNL (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 08:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 08:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 08:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers from Argentine signer Sandra Mihanovich published between 1977 and 1984. They are currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, they are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep these images.

• File:Sandra hagamos el amor.jpg
• File:Sandra mihanovich album 1977.jpg
• File:Sandra pienso en vos.jpg
• File:Sandra puerto pollensa.jpg
• File:Sandra soyloque soy.jpg
• File:Sandra Mihanovich en 1984.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 08:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an image owned by the family with permission of the photographer. It is entirely legitimate - please do not delete ArethusaF38 (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArethusaF38 the photographer needs to send an email to COM:VRT, then we'll be able to keep it. Nakonana (talk) 12:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was taken in 1986 and there are no records through which to trace the photographer. It is an official Naval portrait but the family were given permission to use it.. What should I do? ArethusaF38 (talk) 13:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the author is unknown, it will be under a copyright until 2057. Yann (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers of Argentine singer Valeria Lynch published in the 1980s (except for File:Valerialynch yosoy tucancion.jpg published in 1979). These images are currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, they are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP, we cannot keep them.

• File:Valerialynch acualquierprecio.jpg
• File:Valerialynch cadadiamas.jpg
• File:Valerialynch cantaeltango.jpg
• File:Valerialynch energia.jpg
• File:Valerialynch evita.jpg
• File:Valerialynch paracantarle.jpg
• File:Valerialynch pocomasdemi.jpg
• File:Valerialynch quiereme.jpg
• File:Valerialynch sinfronteras.jpg
• File:Valerialynch yosoy tucancion.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 08:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/Noticeboard/archive/2020#Template:WEF. The OTRS ticket simply confirms that WEF has distributed the cc-by or cc-by-sa license at that time (March 2008). WEF has changed their license to cc-by-nc-sa. Based on this, the OTRS ticket does not represent this change. Official permission is still required A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about those copyright abbreviations, but I have observed several dirty works by this uploader, which are not so difficult to find out. So be careful about his uploads. 200.39.139.14 16:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free licenses can't be revoked. Yann (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The painting technique of this portrait is very bad, almost at the level of a child. Summing up, such a drawing does not fit in the articles. Thyj (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Speedy keep You think it doesn't, but it's COM:INUSE. Try removing it from every article that uses it if you are so convinced it's useless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If use in articles, you have to remove it. and I will find these bad pictures when search for their names with Google. Thyj (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The painting technique of this portrait is very bad, almost at the level of a child. Summing up, such a drawing does not fit in the articles. Thyj (talk) 09:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If use in articles, you have to remove it. and I will find these bad pictures when search for their names with Google. Thyj (talk) 11:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No, you as the nominator should try to remove the thumbnails. Otherwise, the image should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already removed. Thyj (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Still on id.wikipedia, according to the file page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I tried to remove this, but it was misjudged by the abuse filter as vandalism. Thyj (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I appreciate your effort. It seems like a discussion on that Wikipedia would be necessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photos or photos of non-notable persons/events, no educational value, out of scope. And likely some personality rights issues as well.

• File:A Downtown for Everyone (17416333141).jpg
• File:Al Fresco Block Party (5827145139).jpg
• File:Al Fresco Block Party (5827149023).jpg
• File:Al Fresco Block Party (5827149399).jpg
• File:Alana, Cary, Amy, Ken (4524506513).jpg
• File:Alberta Culinary Backstage Dinner (4777884875).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36039991950).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36040012430).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36040015340).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36040025940).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36268331352).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36268334732).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36268338292).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36436610605).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36436615145).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36436646435).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36436651725).jpg
• File:Alberta Food Tours 104 Street Feast (36436654655).jpg
• File:Alberta Legislature (15502504533).jpg
• File:Alberta Open Farm Days (23810277158).jpg
• File:Alberta Open Farm Days (37405185890).jpg
• File:Alberta Open Farm Days (37630689022).jpg
• File:Alberta Open Farm Days (37630692712).jpg
• File:Alcatraz (4972851213).jpg
• File:All is Bright (30758262910).jpg
• File:All is Bright (31011596901).jpg
• File:All is Bright (31011611111).jpg
• File:All is Bright (31089319986).jpg
• File:All is Bright (31125703395).jpg
• File:All is Bright (31125719315).jpg
• File:All is Bright 2015 (22803201427).jpg
• File:All is Bright 2015 (22901558530).jpg
• File:All is Bright on 124 Street (15680402527).jpg
• File:All is Bright on 124 Street (15866157585).jpg
• File:Amoeba Music (4995219816).jpg
• File:Around the fire (185959117).jpg
• File:Arriving (181200796).jpg
• File:Art Gallery of Alberta (4304753127).jpg
• File:Art Gallery of Alberta (4305527352).jpg
• File:Artichoke Pizza (11601362434).jpg

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep Nothing wrong with photos of local events--Trade (talk) 12:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have been very selective: there are still many images of those events. BTW, not every event is in scope automatically... --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep I agree with above, local events should be recorded, the capture commerce and clothing styles, the mundane now is history tomorrow. --RAN (talk) 07:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are more than 22,000 images by this photographer!!! There are still many, many images of these local events. So, deleting some poor uncurated images is not going to affect history... --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is another image come from same author

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Malaysian_Armed_forces_Helicopter_flying_the_army_flag_merdeka_day_Check.jpg

But this image can be reviewed??? and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. Baginda 480 (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photographs itself is freely licensed, but the portrait of Mahathir is not. You need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder and submit it to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Portrait is still copyrighted, and other elements of the parade float might not be covered by Malaysian FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free SVG image of font. 沈澄心✉ 13:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an image of an animated character on the left side of the logo text, it is possible that the animated image is a derivative work of copyrighted content. Astrinko (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pixelated frame of a character of a video game from 1992 called Streets of Rage 2.

Should I change the license for this image? AviFB (talk) 07:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, if the logo uses a 1990s character, then the image of the character's face is copyrighted. The logo meets the copyright threshold. Copyrighted files should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (unless the copyright owner of the logo allows the logo to be freely shared including on Wikimedia Commons platforms). Astrinko (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:CUR Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 15:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two different images uploaded, the current one has no source, no evidence of PD. Quick1984 (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The curves are not simple geometric shapes like circles and triangles. The curves suggest vertical and horizonta stablizers. So the American Airlines decision may put the image above COM:TOO-US. COM:PCP. Glrx (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The curves are not simple geometric shapes like circles and triangles. The curves suggest vertical and horizonta stablizers. So the American Airlines decision may put the image above COM:TOO-US. COM:PCP. Glrx (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Glrx: Maybe we could remove the wings icon, leaving only the name "Aeroporto internazionale di Napoli”? That should be simple geometric shapes. I’d appreciate your opinion. –Yeagvr (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The text would not have a copyright. A better result would be if there is some other basis for a free license. Glrx (talk) 14:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It lacks the shadings of AA logo, and curves do not seem to be enough - Gabuxae (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• This is simpler than the American Airlines plane schematic. I think it's pretty clearly below COM:TOO Italy and also likely to be below COM:TOO US, but I'll be interested to see the ruling by the closing admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an image of myself that I published during a Wikipedia workshop. I no longer want to have it published. Can you please delete it? Thank you so much. Gloria.Luca (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete User image nominated by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an image of myself that I published during a Wikipedia workshop. I no longer want to have it published. Can you please delete it? Thank you so much. Gloria.Luca (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope, check: https://cs.wikiquote.org/wiki/Jan_Benda

• File:Jan Benda leden 2020.jpg

modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 18:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proč by měla být fotografie smazána? Je použita na wikidata.org a wikiquote.org. Chystám se vytvořit stránku psychologa Jana Bendy také wikipedia.org... Shere.khan (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

eğer başka maddeler açacaksanız bilin ki onlar da silinecek. kurallara uygun madde açmazsanız silinir. kişi vikimedya ölçütlerine göre kayda değer değil görünüyor. selamlar. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 20:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• COM:INUSE. The Wikiquote entry is thin, but I don't know what Wikiquote entries usually look like and in any case don't consider any of us in a position to judge Wikiquote entries, as we shouldn't be deleting files when they're in use, unless there's some legal reason to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube channel "Iran Military" is clearly not the copyright owner, this is a footage from Press TV, courtesy of the Lebanese group Hezbollah, which exclusively airs all of its leader's speeches. Protected per Lebansese law. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dra%C5%BEen_Puklavec declined draft, out of project scope, not notable, remove please!

• File:Drazen profil 2.jpg

modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 19:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, Is it ok now? Virusx043 (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

still not. please depend on reliable sources and credibility not photos. the main indrigent is here eggs and flour not strawberry. i hope i explained with that fashionable example :D. @Virusx043 modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 16:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Sources are Croatian national TV. Can you explain in plain English? You explain nothing with stupid metafore. Koristi google translate kad si vec ljen naučit nešto. Virusx043 (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

just read related policy on en wiki, i suggest you to dont really care this DR, you should just improve your article.

+ the most important things is i didnt even say nothing about this image is free licensed or not... this is image is also possible copyright violotion. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 09:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of CC license in source Di (they-them) (talk) 19:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete per nom unless there is confirmation of free license. Unsupported license claim; over TOO; source site clearly marked "Copyright © 2011-2023 Wisconsin Veterans Museum". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.appliedinformation.group/insight/tim-fendley-speaks-at-small-talks for File:TimFendleyHeadshot.jpg , copyvio. other files either possible copyvio or out of project scope. please remove.

• File:TimFendleyHeadshot.jpg
• File:Applied-logo-black.jpg
• File:Georgia Fendley.jpg

modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 19:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent (2006) sculpture still under copyright. Unfortunately, the US does not have freedom of panorama for artworks.

• File:Tiburon Peninsula, San Francisco, California LCCN2013630103.tif
• File:Tiburon, California art in the center of the town LCCN2013630430.tif
• File:“Coming About” Tiburon, California.jpg

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope, duplicate images, possible copyvios. check: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Mar%C3%ADa_Alejandra_Pacheco/Taller

• File:COLABORADORESDESTILADOS36G40.png
• File:Destileria 30002.png
• File:20180817 234401-destileria-maquinaria.jpg
• File:Foto Equipo alta ret.jpg
• File:Destileria-colaboradores-barricaDM1.jpg

modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 19:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license, copied from the web. The author and date of this photo are not known. The uploader cannot know when it was published first or if copyright was or was not claimed. Source website, where this photo was "borrowed" from, does have a copyright notice. Dual Freq (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the owner of the article, Bryan R. Swopes, "I found this image on the Internet without any attribution. As far as I am aware, it is in the Public Domain". Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images found on the internet are not necessarily public domain. There's not enough evidence to prove this work was published in the US 1977-1989. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft crashed in 28 April 1988 (before 1 March 1989), and livery of aircraft was applied about 1984 Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 01:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Publication#United_States. The publication date is not the same as the date the photo was taken. You would need to prove that this image was published without copyright notice between 1978 and March 1, 1989. I don't see how it's possible to prove it was published without copyright notice if we don't even know who took the photo, where it was taken or where it was first published, beyond the 2017 source website. All photos taken in the US between 1978 and March 1, 1989 are not public domain automatically. --Dual Freq (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted photo made in the 1950's from "The Miller Studio" in Pierre, South Dakota. Ooligan (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are we just now noticing this? It's been uploaded since 2019 lol is because me cropping it brought attention to it finally? Anyways i agree it should be deleted i didn't look at the info before making a crop version my bad Putitonamap98 (talk) 22:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep To be eligible for a copyright in the US, the creator would have had to register for a copyright, then renew that copyright. I cannot find either in the USCO database under the sitters name or the photographers name. It is very rare for a photographer to copyright an image, the Associated Press never did. The expense outweighs any potential future earnings. --RAN (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyrighted photo made in the 1950's from "The Miller Studio" in Pierre, South Dakota. Ooligan (talk) 22:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep To be eligible for a copyright in the US, the creator would have had to register for a copyright, then renew that copyright. I cannot find either in the USCO database under the sitters name or the photographers name. It is very rare for a photographer to copyright an image, the Associated Press never did. The expense outweighs any potential future earnings. --RAN (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]