Commons:License review/Requests/Archive/2007

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Not much activity here lately, but I try to revive it. I would like to nominate Enricopedia as Flickr reviewer, per . He/she has been long enough here to be trusted with the Flickr images. I will create a list a list of Flickr reviewers, with Enricopedia as first member and change the {{Flickrreview}} template such that it includes trusted users, if no objections are raised within a reasonable time. (I think 7 days is too long, so I would say something from 3-5 days). -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC) It's “he” and he is a bit proud now :) Enricopedia ⇄ 21:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No objections, so you are now the first official non admin Flickr reviewer. I will create the subpage and correct the templates later this evening or tomorrow. Good luck with reviewing! Side note: If you see images tagged with some cc-xx-2.5 license; this is not the same as a cc-xx-2.0 license. Please change the tag accordingly then. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

es wikipedia sysop, es wikinews sysop Edub 10:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No objections. You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Be sure to read the instructions on Commons:Flickr images/reviewers. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I would love to help with Category:Flickr images needing human review. The backlog there drives me crazy sometimes! Of course I would only review images I didn't upload. I have only 250–300 edits here but I know my way around (quiz me if necessary). I am Wikipedia:User:Coelacan on the English wiki where I have something near 5000 edits, and zero block, rfc, mediation, or arbcom history. — coelacan — 18:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Please carefully read the instructions and the Commons licensing policy. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I would like to participate in Flickr images reviews. Don't have much edits here. But I watch the images in RuWiki ru:Участник:Vayaka contribs in RuWiki.--Vaya 21:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know you and I don't speak Russian, so there is no way for me to confirm anything about you. If you know a Russian Commons regular, feel free to ask him to post here. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support. I know this user in ru-wiki and I think he will be a good reviewer here. --Panther 13:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support. Per Panther ;) --Kaganer 18:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome on board. Please be sure to read all relevant instructions before you start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

My fingers are simply itching to review all the non-automated Flickr images. I'm an administrator on the Dutch Wikipedia, and a regular contributor on the English Wikipedia and here on Commons. Husky 16:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Welcome on board. Please be sure to read all relevant instructions before you start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been a contributer for the commons for quite a while, and I'm also an admin by the same name at the English Wikipedia. --w^{L <speak·creatively>} 08:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, please carefully read the instructions and all relevant Commons policies and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've done a bunch of work a while back with the Yorck project and I have transferred Flickr images myself and occasionally am linked to them and would enjoy helping reviewing. My main reason for this request is actually a clarification: are admins from other projects trusted? I am an admin on EN so 1) am I a "trusted user" automatically and 2) if I am how can I show that I am the same user? (although, my EN page links to my commons page so it's pretty clear). gren 04:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been on Commons for a long time. I'm an admin on EN (en:User:Andrew Levine). I think thay qualifies me as "trusted." Andrew Levine 16:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been contributing to Commons for about a year and I am an admin on the Swedish Wikipedia. My activities on sv.wiki are mainly image-copyright related and uploading files from sv.wiki to Commons. /Lokal_Profil 01:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

You'll find me uploading a lot of Flickr images, so I might just as well review some. I was TheBernFiles (talk · contribs) before I usurped my new username, Sandstein. This is also my en.wiki username, where I'm an administrator. Sandstein 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd love to help clear the current backlog. I'm not the most experienced editor on the Commons, but I am a frequent contributor on en.wiki.Nmajdan 19:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have some worries about the fact that

1. You do not have much activity at Commons
2. You recently uploaded Image:BOK Center-BothRenditions.jpg, which was deleted being a copyright violation.

Summarizing, I have no evidence that you understand copyrights correctly. I'm sorry, but maybe later. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I have been on Commons for 3 or 4 months now and I'd like to help clear out the massive backlog of images. I'm definetly a trusted user on EN Wiki with 3000+ edits. Hope I can help! --Yarnalgo 20:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two images uploaded by you on enwiki have been deleted because of copyright problems: [1], [2]. Why would that be? Sandstein 21:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first, was an edit of another image that the uploader claimed to be in the public domain but it was found to not be. The second was fair use and was being used, but was taken out of an article and was orphaned, so it was deleted. --Yarnalgo 03:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a week and I have gotten no opposition, only support. So, can I start reviewing Flickr images now? Not to be impatient or anything... :) --Yarnalgo 04:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being this late. Go ahead, start reading the relevant policies: Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Yarnalgo 02:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been on commons for awhile, but mainly I'm on en.wiki. I've moved quite a bit of images from en.wiki to commons (250?) and I've put up a few images here that I've found and a few images of my own. I'm quite familiar with copyright status and licensing and sourcing and have been very active on en.wiki with image patrolling. It may appear (via my talk page on en.wiki or otherwise) that I've uploaded images that have no source or are otherwise bad (orphaned fair use), but it's mainly because I go through a category there called "Fair use reduction requests" that reduce the images that are fair used from the oversized (sometimes 2100x1400+!) to a more appropriate (~300x200) size. Once that is done, the previous versions are removed making it appear I am the only uploader of the image for which I am really not. I definately think flickr reviewing it important as I've had images that have changed licenses on me and the flickr reviewing has "saved" me before, or not having the flickr review has made me regret it. You can ask several folks that are involved with images on en.wiki if I'm a regular (like BigDT) with images. I'm also typically available in the IRC channel from 2200-0300 UTC. I've got over 15k edits. I am not an admin, but had a failed RFA on en.wiki in Jan/Feb. --MECU 01:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we know you are involved with images on en.wiki. ;) I  Support you. Yonatan ^talk 19:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can now start reviewing. Read Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and go ahead. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support, I know I'm late and you have the power... but, I think you're trustworthy... if anything too copyright paranoid with fair use--which means you'll be good for this job :) --gren 12:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Any objections to User:Jon Harald Søby, steward and former Commons admin? Kjetil r 02:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No objections -- Bryan (talk to me) 07:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• None --Iamunknown 18:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Ok, he can start. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been at Commons for a while. In addition I am an administrator at the English-language Wikibooks (c.f. Special:Listusers) and am a contributor to the English-language Wikipedia. I regularly do image-related maintenance including tagging or listing unlicensed or unfree images for deletion, cycling through Special:Uncategorizedcategories, or whatever else I feel up to doing. I'd like to be able to help out with the Flickreview backlogs and separate the freely licensed images from the unfree images. I understand that users can choose a variety of licenses — even different version numbers (2.0 and 2.5 for example) of Creative Commons licenses — and that, even if the image license on Flickr indicates that it is freely licensed, the uploader may not necessarily be the rights holder. With this knowledge and the knowledge in general that I have acquired from regular Wikipedia and Commons editing, I feel that I can help out and would enjoy doing so. Regards, Iamunknown 04:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Mr. Unknown can be trusted. Kjetil r 06:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Yonatan ^talk 09:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Frequent contributor at Media copyright questions, definitely knows what (s)he's doing. ShadowHalo 00:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, based on en: activities. Jkelly 20:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

The community has shown no objections. Please read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing Flickr images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like permission to act as a flickr reviewer. Most of my contributions are image-related and I'm active at en-FPC amongst other places. I've come across a few images of late which have been brought across from flickr with incomplete licencing details and/or with statements like "permission obtained" when in fact the image is CC-BY. There don't seem to be that many people doing this and I'm probably as qualified as anyone else to help out. --Yummifruitbat 15:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support, we can always need more help. By the way, I love your panorama photos! Kjetil r 16:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks very much! --Yummifruitbat 14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question what experience do you have with copyrights, maintenance or Flickr? (I ask this upon looking at your contributions.) --Iamunknown 18:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't point to any specific on-wiki experience in copyrights, and I don't have a Flickr account, but I'm familiar with the workings of the site and its tagging system. I've done a bit of identifying probably-unfree-images on en along with assorted other maintenance tasks (e.g. feature picture promotions, moving the odd image across to Commons). I admit that my contributions to the Commons to date have been image uploads, rather than maintenance. I have a good understanding of image copyright issues - you'll have to take my word for that, I'm afraid. I'm a reasonably experienced amateur photographer so I expect to be able to identify dubious licencing by comparing EXIF data, photographic style, etc. Basically I'm offering to help out where and when I can with this; maybe I've underestimated the requirements for 'trustedness' - I'm not running for adminship! I think my contribution history at en supports the fact that I'm a sensible, good-faith editor with a solid understanding of image matters (Howcheng has seen quite a bit of me at en-FPC from time to time; perhaps he'd vouch for me?). If I haven't demonstrated enough experience to be considered trustworthy then I guess I'll concentrate on other things. --Yummifruitbat 14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the long reply. I'm leaning towards objecting based on a lack of image- and copyright-related edits I can judge by. Please know, however, that there is always room for help! I have four links on my userpage at User:Iamunknown that might be of help. Also the links at Special:Recentchanges allow for endless maintenance! Regards, Iamunknown 23:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • As a reasonably experienced photographer, Yummifruitbat should be able to spot dubious licencing. Come on, being a trusted user is not a big deal. Kjetil r 00:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't think I am making it a big deal. I think that trusted users should have at least one or two image taggings under his or her belt, which I don't see here. (Well I can't see deleted edits, but I don't see talk page notifications, which I would assume would go along with said deleted edits.) --Iamunknown 00:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Deleted edits can be seen here. Only one though /Lokal_Profil 00:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • I've done a section of odder's Es. The deleted edit was a picture edit I uploaded at EN-FPC which was promoted and overwrote the original; the duplicate (which I created) was deleted. --Yummifruitbat 03:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Ping - I've done some tagging as requested. Please review my contributions and indicate whether I appear more trustworthy as a result. --Yummifruitbat 03:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I take issue with being characterised as not trusting you. It is not true; if I trusted or distrusted you, I would be making a judgement, but I have no history of edits by which to make such a judgement. Your only contributions prior to 01:43, 11 April 2007 were to image description pages of images you uploaded, to your user page, to five user's talk pages, to a couple of project-space pages and to this page. I thank you for wanting to help out. I am, however, left wondering how well you are familiarised with the project and with the intricacies of copyrights and licensing. I maintain my objection and would eagerly point you to the Clean the Commons! project (I know you have already been there, having reviewed your contributions) from which there are many images licensing issues to resolve whenever you feel the need or have the time to help out. --Iamunknown 06:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry if that came across the wrong way. I'm not characterising you as thinking me untrustworthy, merely indicating that I have now undertaken to illustrate through my contributions that I am familiar with Commons copyright policies, as you asked. You said "I think trusted users should have at least one or two image taggings under his or her belt, which I don't see here." Well, I now have 60+ image taggings under my belt and you still object. With all due respect, I am not interested in spending hours resolving missing licence issues and placing tags where the user has forgotten to do so otherwise I would just have gone straight there and done it without troubling to ask anybody. I have offered to review the licence tags on Flickr images and identify mis-tagged, erroneously uploaded or dubious-provenance images and to indicate where images obtained from Flickr appear to be genuinely acceptable to the Commons. I believe I would do a good job of this because I have extensive experience (which you have ignored) of image-related work on the English Wikipedia; because I am familiar with copyright policy (as I have now demonstrated); because I am a photographer myself and can spot inconsistencies in style, quality, EXIF data, etc. which might indicate false licencing; and because I can read and am capable of crosschecking the Commons tag against the Flickr one. I was under the impression that assumption of good faith was a policy here as much as on any other Wikimedia project, so I'd appreciate it if I was not asked to jump over ever-rising hurdles just to help out where I have offered. I'd be happy for someone to review my Flickr review work for a short while if others genuinely shared your concern that I might not be capable of applying policy correctly. --Yummifruitbat 12:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I think the user has shown that they understand the copyright system and Commons' tagging policy. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --GeorgHH 20:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing Flickr images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi all, I'm self nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm an administrator on Indian language wikipedias of gu: and hi: . I really like to keep wikipedias free of copyvio images and I have found that the collection of indian images is really lacking, so I'm turning to Flickr now and I've already got hold of a few images. I believe I understand the process and policies of wikipedias and commons reasonably well, and when in doubt, I'm not afraid to ask. Thanks --Spundun 04:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Spundun seems to be well-intentioned and to be familiar with image policies here and, in view of the professed reticence to act whereof he does not know and of two communities' having reposed trust in him, seems altogether unlikely to act inappropriately. Jahiegel 04:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

I'm closing this one as the user seems to be hardly active lately. Feel free to open it (anybody) when you're back. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on English Wikipedia, and I spend a decent amount of time dealing with copyright issues at w:Wikipedia:Media copyright questions and tagging images. I'm not as active on Commons, but I'm sure I could help reduce the backlog at Category:Flickr images needing human review. ShadowHalo 23:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 SupportMECU≈talk 03:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our guidelines state that admins from other project can speedily apply for Flickr review status. You are hereby a reviewer. Please make sure you have read all relevant guidelines on Commons:Flickr images, Commons:Licensing and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I would love to help with Category:Flickr images needing human review - it seems to be an area which could always do with an extra pair of eyes and a willing pair of hands. I don't have many edits here, but I know my way around. I am Riana on en-WP, where I am an admin, and often help out with image-related deletions, and answer licensing/copyright questions for new people. riana_dzasta 01:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support - Riana seems highly clueful on the English Wikipedia. I doubt my vote carries much weight since I've not had time to help out much at all since I got my Trusted ticket, but I have no doubt that Riana would be a great help. --Yummifruitbat 04:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not?  :-) Riana has always been helpful at en.WP and, in my interactions, definitely "gets" image licensing; she'll do just fine. --Iamunknown 03:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Although she may be speedily made a reviewer in view of her admin status at en.wiki, I note that I would join in Iam's comments and would surely support even were this not a formality. Jahiegel 05:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Correct. You can start reviewing. Please read the instructions mentioned above before reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hello,
I saw the Review category, and I think you can use a helping hand, so I'm nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm not that active on commons, but I'm quite busy on the Dutch wikipedia on the image requested for deletion-page, with nominating and deleting images. I'm also an admin on the Dutch wikipedia. Kameraad Pjotr 20:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

As an administrator of another wiki, you are hereby allowed to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I'd like to request permission to review Flickr images. I'm an administrator over on the English Wikipedia and spend a fair amount of time on Commons addressing issues I encounter at en. as well as uploading my own images. I'm a Flickr user and am familiar with the use of Flickr image on Commons. As per the guidelines at Commons:Flickr images, as an administrator of another Wikimedia wiki, I request speedy permission. I look forward to trying to reduce the backlog at Category:Flickr images needing human review. Thanks. Adambro 12:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} --Iamunknown 23:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an admin on Nynorsk Wikipedia and a long-time contributor to Commons. I have uploaded a lot of pictures from Flickr myself, and would like to make myself useful by reviewing the works of others. --Ranveig 15:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} MECU≈talk 01:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like permission to act as a Flickr reviewer because I would like to participate in Flickr images reviews (between other things). I don't have much edits here (I am beginning now to contribute massively) but most of my contributions as admin on Italian Wikipedia are image-copyright related (I'm very active in image patrolling). I know CC licenses (and copyright tagging in general) very well and I have an account on Flickr. Thank you--Trixt 00:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. riana_dzasta 07:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi all, I'm self nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm an occational contributor and would simply like to be or more assistance to the community. I understand policies (I do admit, I have had a problem originally wiht non free images) but, have had no problems with actual maintainance etc. talk to symode09's 15:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose -- Sorry, but the user has very few edits on Commons and a history of copyvios. Half of his uploads have been deleted as copyvios. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment -- When I began, yes, I had HEAPS of copyvio's - i have learnt from this. The only recent copyvios were virginia tech and that was simply because I could not use the wikinews upload feature for some reason. --talk to symode09's 17:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Why is your signature an external link instead of an internal one? It makes it very confusing, which is not a great thing when seeking a position that involves communication. Also, I assume that you can now or will be able to in the future access Commons through Wikimedia's secure server. For example, https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Main_Page takes you to English Wikipedia on the secure server. Having a hardlinked signature would break that functionality for anyone that accesses Commons that way. --BigDT 01:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • You can, however, use {{fullurl:User talk:Symode09}} to achieve the same functionality across servers. --Iamunknown 03:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose -- few edits, history of copyvios, history of self-promotion, sig that breaks for users of the secure server.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 21:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reviewer status declined -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Self nomination. I've been on commons for a year now, mostly uploading stuff to use on pl.wiki and until recently, I haven't really been involved with the community here, lately though I've developed peculiar interest in watching Latest files :) and because every now and again I see image from Flickr which I could review. I though I'll apply for a reviewer status. Reviewing won't be my main objective but I'm sure I'll find it useful while carrying out my normal tasks --Robek _{(talk|contribs)} 01:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Looks like a user who knows what he is doing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I see nothing to suggest that Robek should be unfit for Flickr review. Jahiegel 22:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

After four days there seem to be no objections against you reviewing Flickr images. Please make sure that you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm nominating myself, because I could really help with reviewing Flickr images. Da Man2 23:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Vigorously  Oppose per User talk:Da Man2#Image:Thegame2005.jpg.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment COM:AN/U#Da Man2 (talk • contribs), Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yung6, COM:AN/V#Da Man2 -- Editor at Large • talk 15:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment In light of User talk:Da Man2#Image:Thegame2005.jpg it may be wise to delete Image:Rapper Ice Cube 2005.jpg and Image:BowWow April2007.jpg from the Commons, both of which came from this user's flickr account (those are just the ones I know about). riana_dzasta 16:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Confirmation declined. Does not really need explanation, does it? -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I figure it's about time to make up for the work I've made the Flickr reviewers do with the various images I've uploaded. I have about 600 edits on Commons, have been around for about two years and am an administrator on English Wikipedia. Cheers, BanyanTree 05:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. riana_dzasta 06:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like to help out at Commons reviewing Flickr images. I help out with simple task on Commons, and would like to help out more here by reviewing images. I understand commons policies pretty well, and haven't had any problems here. If you're curious, you may check out my more active account at the English Wikipedia. Thanks! ~ Wikihermit 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should be more familiar with some fundamental things on Commons, like putting new posts at the bottom and linking to your real userpage at English Wikipedia, w:user:Wikihermit.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's linked under Other Wikimedia Accounts —> Wikipedia. ~ Wikihermit 18:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When considering your request, we are of course not just interested in whether we judge you can be "trusted", we are also looking at whether you have a good grasp of image licensing. A week ago you uploaded Image:01thecircus.jpg which had been uploaded to enwiki. The image description on enwiki says that the image was found "on the internet and edited it in photoshop" and fails to provide a source. In this circumstance it is likely the image is a copyright violation as the majority of images online are, of course, not released under the GFDL and because there is no source we are unable to verify this. Because of this I am afraid I must  Oppose your request to review Flickr images. Reviewing Flickr image is not as simple as checking the licence is the same as the image uploaded on Commons, it requires judgement as to whether the Flickr user is actually in a position to release the image under CC. Your upload of Image:01thecircus.jpg with the description as I've noted concerns me with regard to this. Adambro 21:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I used CommonsHelper tool to upload that image. When I uploaded that image I was in "autopilot" moving images from Wikimedia projects to commons (5 images were uploaded in a 15 minute timespan). I could have skipped reading the description when I uploaded the file, but I understand your reasoning completely. ~ Wikihermit 23:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Although we generally avoid on one project considering one's actions on another project, most especially relative to images, inasmuch as policies differ not insignificantly across projects, but I think some of the discussion on Wikihermit's recent request for adminship on en.wiki might be valuable; a few concerns about the understanding of image issues similar to those one might encounter reviewing Flickr content arose. Whilst Wikihermit seemed well to appreciate the concerns and quickly to rectify in errors, and although he demonstrates a similar capacity for rapid growth here, I can't imagine that one could draw any firm positive conclusion as to WH's capacity and fitness for (the admittedly generally facile) Flickr review from his contribution history at present. Jahiegel 03:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose - for the reasons stated above and in my posts to your user talk page here, as well as for the image licensing understanding issues raised in your recent request for adminship on en.wiki. OTOH, this edit of yours only saw the light of day for 43 minutes.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Closed, no support for promotion. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like to help, I've uploaded a few hundred images, I understand copyright. I think I can spot a copyright violation. edward 20:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Looking at your uploads, you have several from this flickr user. Can I assume that this is you? If so, you may want to make that clear on the image description page. That said, I  Support - nothing in your contributions jumps out at me. --BigDT 15:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Sorry for the delay; You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Please first read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been patrolling Special:Newimages lately, and have been tagging unsourced, unlicensed, and images without permission with the appropriate templates and warning the users at the same time. While I'm at it, I would also like the privilege of reviewing flickr images to check for copyvios and license incompatibilities as well as doing regular image patrolling. (→zelzany - framed) 20:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support, trustworthy person. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I agree with Bryan. Personalguy 21:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider harmonizing "Vishwin60" with "→zelzany - framed"? What's wrong with {{Cc-by-sa-1.0}}, {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}, and {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, that you chose not to use them to license your images? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, how do you square this edit with your later upload of Image:I-176.svg as documented in this log (but for some reason not in this other log)?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Sorry for the delay; You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Please first read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Self-nomination. I uploaded 2 images from Flickr that I found both of them under the license of CC-BY-SA-2.0 on the Flickr page, and have self-nominated myslef after reading this. Personalguy 20:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose too unexperienced. Please try later when you have more experience. (→zelzany - framed) 20:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If people oppose this, how are the images I posted gonna get reviewed? Personalguy 20:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Somebody else will review it. Please be patient. (→zelzany - framed) 20:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Okay. Personalguy 20:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • I have reviewed both images. (For the burger, I also uploaded the larger image and cleaned it up a bit. It is usually a good idea to upload the highest resolution version available.) I think that there may be a little misunderstanding here - this page is where you seek community approval to become a reviewer yourself - all you have to do to get a review of an image you upload is tag it with {{Flickrreview}}. --BigDT 21:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

blocked sock; no access. (→zelzany - framed) 17:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I created my Wikipedia account en:User:N in 2004, but I only became very active in December 2006, although I have been reading the site sporadically since 2004. I've been active for about a month on Commons, and I've been participating in deletion requests and uploading a few score free images. I would like to help review images (of course not mine) when the bot is down. I have contributed the laws of two countries (Mexico, Guatemala) to COM:FOP and two others (Egypt and PRC) were added by others based on English translations of copyright laws that I found. -Nard 22:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I am familiar with N's work on Commons and en.WP and, while I may disagree him on some interpretations of copyright law, I am confident he has the knowledge to be a Flickr reviewer, and I am confident that he can be trusted to be a Flickr reviewer.  Support --Iamunknown 03:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  One question (after my enthusiastic support :P): Would you please add babel (language) templates, so other editors know your language skills? --Iamunknown 03:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Created my user page. :) thanks for your support. -Nard 13:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support nothing at your contribs jumps out at me (unless I'm missing something). (→zelzany - framed) 17:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment - why would you want to blank your user talk page?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was a generic welcome message and an incorrect warning that something was missing the source (which I failed to add in the description when I uploaded it, but which I edited in moments later). Does your talk page still contain your generic welcome message and haven't you ever blanked an incorrect warning? I even used a descriptive edit summary explaining that the error was fixed. I'm sure you are aware of en:WP:DTTR, right? -Nard 01:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The generic welcome message contains some important links. Where else are you going to find a link to the CommonsHelper? The warning was correct when it was given. My talk page archives still contain my generic welcome messages. I don't think I have blanked even an incorrect warning, although I may have ridiculed it and/or allowed it to be archived in due course. Yes, I'm aware of the essay en:WP:DTTR (which does not necessarily apply to Commons), but you had only been contributing regularly for a few days at the time.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • So very true. I only found out about CH when I got the CH2 script. Incidentally, are there archivebots I could use? -Nard 09:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • User:MiszaBot. And this page could use an archiver as well. I'll create one. No objections about N's candidacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bryan (talk • contribs) at 14:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, {{Flickrreview}} and Commons:Flickr images and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, all. I'm self-nominating because I see a need for more reviewers to spread the workload. I understand licensing and copyright issues and how to read the licensing from a Flickr photo page. I am concerned when "The copyright status of the image was undeterminable by the bot, and requires human attention", especially in such cases as the image I reuploaded in maximum resolution (I thought correctly) to Image:570374817 f926fc2ec2.jpg. I have made over 1,900 edits on Wikimedia Commons as User:Jeff G. since I registered here on 25 February 2007, I have made over 2,200 edits on English Wikipedia since I registered there as w:User:JeffGent on 21 December 2006 and changed my name to w:User:Jeff G. on 31 May 2007, I have participated on Wikimedia's Bugzilla since I registered there on 20 May 2007 (they don't seem to count edits), I have a Flickr Pro Account, and I have tried to make each project better with each edit, or at least to do no harm.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support concise understanding of copyright. Nothing in your contribs jumps out at me (unless I'm missing something), though Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Image:NYC subway simplified map 50pct-optimized.png may trouble some people. I personally think that was a minor issue which would not affect how flickr images are reviewed. Good luck, (→O - v d e) 00:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reversed my position on that image after reviewing Lar's thoughtful analysis and your comment above. Thank you for your wish of good luck.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support user understands copyright, and can be trusted to review images from flickr. -Nard 17:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment That was a bug in Flickreviewr. Should soon be fixed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing that bug, Bryan.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - considerate, thoughtful reviewer who errs on the side of caution, and corrects mistakes when warranted, just the sort needed for reviewing license claims. ++Lar: t/c 22:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, {{Flickrreview}} and Commons:Flickr images and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hello everyone,

I just saw an image that needs flickr-review, so I'm requesting permission to join in on that effort. I'm an active Wikimedian since April 2006, I've uploaded quite some images on Commons and have participated in discussions here from time to time. I've learned a lot from the mistakes I've made in the past on images that I uploaded that have been deleted. I recently joined the OTRS team to deal with some requests in smaller languages too (especially Dutch). I'm mostly active on Wikinews where I am an admin.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on enwiki (see my user page) and I've contributed to the backlogs so I think I'll help out by reducing them. I've read the policies on Licensing and Flickr images and I reckon I'm ready to help out. James086^{Talk | Email} 10:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. (→O - RLY?) 18:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I gather administrators on other Wikipedias are speedily given reviewer status. I'm an admin on EN, and would appreciate reviewer status. I'm not sure if that still means I have to post here as a formality, but just in case, I am posting here. If I misunderstood something, a Commons admin should please feel free to remove my {{User trusted}} tag from my user page. --AnonEMouse 21:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. (→O - RLY?) 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I have come across a couple of images that need flickr-review, and would like to 'give a hand' to commons you guys in reviewing flickr images. I am a administrator on en.wikinews, and mi.wikipedia. I am also an OTRS Agent Brian New Zealand 09:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Adambro 11:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like to join in the effort. I photograph a lot and post many of my photos on flickr. I'd like to make as many of these as possible available here and to ensure that they are properly licensed and integrated into the database. Aldaron 15:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose -- This user has taken some great photographs which are very welcome on Commons but I'm concerned that the comment above suggests that they intend to only review images they have uploaded. For this reason I cannot support the request as doing so would devalue the Flickr image review process. Adambro 15:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed where in the guidelines review of one's own work is prohibited. My understanding is that the flickr image review process is intended to confirm that the posted images have appropriate licenses (something the original flickr photographer is, in fact, ideally suited to do). Aldaron 16:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe there is such prohibition on reviewing ones own images however I feel uncomfortable with the idea, hence my opposition to your request. Other editors may of course have other opinions on the issue and not consider it a problem. Adambro 16:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly "reviewing" (in some abstract sense) one's own images would be a legitimate concern, but my request is directed at something quite a bit more specific: confirming a valid license. Aldaron 17:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the confusion, where I say "reviewing" I am referring to the process of confirming the licence on Flickr is valid not reviewing in a checking that the image is within the Commons:Project scope sense for example. Adambro 17:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I can't follow the rational of your objection. Aldaron 17:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons_talk:Flickr_images#Reviewing_own_images where I have outlined my opinion on this issue in more detail. Adambro 17:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion contiunes there. I think you have it backwards. Aldaron 18:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose for now per the discussion there. ++Lar: t/c 03:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment There is no need for Flickr review if the user on Commons and Flickr are the same. The whole point of the review is that images that are not from Commons users are to be reviewed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given the above, I have created Template:Flickr-self.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 20:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Aldaron 20:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 00:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using it. Aldaron 20:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support per Bryan's comment above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 00:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Not sure whether this is still relevant? -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like to join in reviewing. I've started uploading images from flickr and had them reviewed- I'd like to do my bit in reviewing images now. McLurker 11:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose - Sorry, I don't think you're ready yet. The one Flickr image you uploaded, Image:Arran fields.jpg, was a copyvio (because the uploader of http://www.flickr.com/photos/ripperdoc/54314406/ is now using by-NC-sa licensing).   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 12:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, that was a Wikipedia image, not uploaded directly from flickr. I didn't review it because of all the stuff above about not reviewing images you upload. The image I have uploaded from flickr passed review. McLurker 12:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  The only thing that matters is what the original source was (in this case, flickr). I've deleted the image because the noncommercial license isn't allowed here. (→O - RLY?) 12:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Not promoted due to lack of community support. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an admin on the English Wikipedia (my RfA) and I am looking for a way to help out at the Commons, and since this is backlogged, I think this might be a good way to start. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • Wikipedia)} 16:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}.

And a side note: I saw on your meta page that you called this the English Wikimedia Commons. Note that there exists no such thing as an English Wikimedia Commons, and that this is a multilingual project ;) -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I would like to join the effort, too. I look for free images all of the time on Flickr, and I have asked people around on Flickr for images to upload to the project. One was for Aretha Franklin and the other was for Seth MacFarlane. Cheers. Miranda 01:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support ~ Wikihermit 01:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Trustworthy user both on en-WP and Commons, good worker, seems to understand licensing sufficiently. ~ Riana ⁂ 01:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, obviously. No problems with her on the english 'pedia, much less here. :-) --Boricuaeddie 19:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per all of the above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

With no opposition, the community has given you permission to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'd like to help out - my primary goal is to help obtain free content, and I think I have a good understanding of licenses. A gallery of images I have obtained from copyright holders can be seen here. Videmus Omnia 05:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support this great guy, with my last post till november. -Nard 10:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Of course ~ Riana ⁂ 10:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - user is trustworthy, and has extensive experience with copyright and Wikimedia policy. Quadell (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - frighteningly proficient at obtaining beautiful images, ruthless at pursuing questionable licences. --AnonEMouse 13:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support great with images. ~ Wikihermit 16:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - excellent work already in obtaining free content, and ensuring that it is in fact free.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

With no opposition, the community has given you permission to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin at en.wiki and have been uploading flickr images for a while now. Don't know what kind of a backlog commons is looking at, but I'd be more than willing to lend a hand. ˉ^anetode╦╩ 23:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an sysop at en. (Andrew c), and would like to be a Flickr reviewer. Perhaps this may be a good place for me to begin more serious contributions here at the commons. -Andrew c 00:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia, and was told I could apply to be a flickr reviewer here. WilyD 16:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia and have been looking for ways to get more involved on Commons. I've uploaded a few images but figured this would be a good way to become more acquainted with this project and its users. auburnpilot (talk - en.wiki) 18:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Cheers! --Iamunknown 12:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia (as User:Nick) and like AuburnPilot above, I'd like to take more of an interest in Commons. I'm rather familiar with Flickr so it seems like this would be a sensible place to start. Heligoland 20:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Saludos. I've already uploaded several images from Flickr (correctly, of course :-)), and I think I might be able to help out a lot around here if I was able to review images. Thanks, Boricuaeddie 19:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Nothing that suggests otherwise. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Miranda 00:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

The community has unanimously supported Boricuaeddie having review status, and at this time, it has been granted. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. —O (说 • 喝) 21:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hello, I am always looking for new ways to help Wikimedia wikis (helps keep me from getting burnt out doing just one thing, ya know), and I'm sure that reviewing flickr images is something I can easily do to help out more here on commons. I'm sysop on enwikinews since April 2007, under this same username. This diff links my WN account with my meta account, and this page links my meta account to this account on Commons. Zachary 18:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. —O (说 • 喝) 22:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia and I would like to request speedy access to Flickr review privileges. Here is a diff showing that I am the same user using the name "Johntex" on Commons and on the English Wikipedia. Thanks very much, Johntex 03:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Johntex is a reliable admin at en. --BigDT 03:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. --Boricuaeddie 21:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin on the English Wikipedia and I am requesting speedy access to the review Flickr images. Here is evidence that I am the same user (and evidence of my administrative permissions) on the English Wikipedia. Thanks! IronGargoyle 05:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. --Boricuaeddie 21:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I'd like to help out with the backlog/flickr image reviewing. I help out on wikipedia with reviewing images and I believe I have a good understanding of licensing. ~ Wikihermit 17:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support. No veo ningún problema aquí :-) --Boricuaeddie 19:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Question Is Wikihermit active here? He or she is retired, according to his or her English-language Wikipedia user page. --Iamunknown 23:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah. Should we ask him? --Boricuaeddie 23:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • He appears to have just invoked his right to vanish on en.wiki. All userspace pages (including talk) have been deleted. auburnpilot (talk - en.wiki) 01:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Still here though :). ~ Wikihermit 03:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support - Knowledgable on licensing. Videmus Omnia 23:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Even though there may have been an abrupt vanishing act by the user itself, the community has supported this user to review flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. —O (说 • 喝) 22:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I know I am new but I know licensing pretty well and I help on Wikipedia with images. I think I can help with all of the flickr work. Alpta 15:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support. Looks good. --Boricuaeddie 21:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - seems familiar with licensing, and accomplishing much good in needed image work. Videmus Omnia 23:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Promoted. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hey, I work on Commons since a few months and I think I know almost everything about licensing images correctly and, of course, I have got a Flickr-Account since a while. I hope you think almost like me ;) ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 13:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support — good work with images, although it would be better if you would upload some Flickr images so that I can be sure that you know which are permitted here at Commons and which are not. But, that's not entirely necessary, so I still support :-) --Boricuaeddie 19:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment if you want, I'll do... ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 11:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:My_Ibanez.jpg

Image:New-age.jpg

•  Support - has done well with licensing.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Sounds good to me. CO₂ 23:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. You may now start reviewing. —O (说 • 喝) 23:39, 23 September 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

OK, I'm ready to help out. I'm a sysop at ENWP (ID check). After dialog with O, I plan to only review others' images.--Chaser 19:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. —O (说 • 喝) 22:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I upload a lot of images from flickr, and it would probably ease the burden on other reviewers if I could just tag them as reviewed myself. JACOPLANE • 2007-09-24 18:46

Please note that you shouldn't be reviewing your own images. That would avoid the double checking that Flickrreviewing produces. Platonides 19:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. :) ~ Riana ⁂ 19:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an very experienced editor on the English Wikipedia who understands copyright/licensing issues rather well. I have recently gotten involved with finding good, free images on Flickr, and feel that I can help with the review process. I understand that I cannot tag my own uploads, but it seems like there is no shortage of images needing review that are not my uploads.... -Seidenstud 04:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support looks good. He uploaded a lot of images from Flickr without any problems. ← Körnerbrötchen <✉> 15:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and consider placing {{User trusted}} on your userpage. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Admin at enwiki and at metawiki. See en:User:Eagle 101 and meta:User:Eagle 101. I would not mind being able to review the few that I come across in my other activities here. Eagle 101 08:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Be certain to review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Cheers, Iamunknown 09:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm a admin over at en.wikipedia.org, See here. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 21:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. —O (说 • 喝) 22:39, 01 October 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Administrator at en Wikipedia, good understanding of licenses. I will let her know that I have nominated her here. Videmus Omnia 13:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and consider placing {{User trusted}} on your userpage. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia and Meta-Wiki, and I would like to help out with reviewing Flickr images. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and consider placing {{User trusted}} on your userpage. :) ~ Riana ⁂ 15:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an admin at enwiki, and I would like permission to help out with reviewing images that need it. I've uploaded some images here in the last few weeks, all from flickr, so please check over those to make sure I know what I'm doing. Picaroon (t) 05:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi there. I have a few comments. (1) Thanks for expressing interest in working here at Commons. (2) I know it was a long time ago, and the license may have changed in the time between uploading Image:Lesotho maletsunyane falls.jpg and now, but make sure to use the correct Creative Commons license. They are not the same (as I am sure you know)!  :) (3) With regards to your recent uploads, I would strongly suggest that you contact Shiraz Chakera through Flickr mail to thank him for licensing his work freely, confirm that is what his intent was and that he is indeed the copyright holder (maybe not the last part... his works look fine to me :), and ask if he would mind you uploading them to Wikimedia Commons. I think it is a nice courtesy, especially when you want to upload all of a Flickr user's photographs. And, best of all, it gets Wikimedia Commons out there and we get some free advertising! ;o) Other than, looks fine, and I am sure that you will be speedy reviewed as an admin on another wiki. Cheers, --Iamunknown 07:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I've learned the acceptable licenses and the unacceptable ones. I guess that license on the Maletsunyane image had changed since I uploaded it and Yonatanh confirmed that it was accurate. When looking for images on flickr, I select the commercial-use and the derivatives allowed options on the advanced search page, so I know all the images I get are acceptable. I'll try to email Shiraz now, thanks for the idea. Picaroon (t) 02:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and consider placing {{User trusted}} on your userpage. :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I often participate in housekeeping tasks here and over at wikipedia, where I have amassed well over 4,000 edits. Here I mainly participate in closing FPC's and the like at the moment. I am looking to expand this activity into my scope of helpfulness here, and I've thouroghly reviewed the appropriate documentation. --Pumpmeup 08:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and consider placing {{User trusted}} on your userpage. You can then start reviewing -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Dihydrogen Monoxide on Enwp. Whilst I haven't transferred enormous amounts of Flickr images, I do think I have a good knowledge of the policy behind them, etc. Giggy\^Talk 01:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support — I trust you not to screw up :-) --Boricuæddie 15:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. O₂ (息 • 吹) 23:46, 20 October 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm Chris.B over at the English Wikipedia where I have nearly 5000 edits. I am well aquainted with the non-free content policy there, and regularly contribute to the imagespace as well as the featured picture candidates. I have recently become involved with uploading free images from Flickr, and feel that I would benefit by helping out with the review process. -- RedCoat 11:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support — strong contribs, both here and at en.wiki. --Boricuæddie 15:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}} and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia, and am aware of the licensing policy of Commons. I would like to help review flickr images. Cheers. --D_arkF_alls ^talk 08:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Be sure to review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Good luck! --Boricuæddie 00:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been an editor on Wikipedia since 2005 (with two separate accounts) and a contributor here at Commons since February 2007. I think I have a solid understanding of copyright policy and how it relates to Wikimedia projects. I've contributed many self-made files as well as CC-licensed images from Flickr. Being able to review such files myself would ease my and others' work here. Lucis 22:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - A few or your images have been deleted, but I see no Flickr issues, so I see no reason not to trust you. Good luck :) Giggy\^Talk 07:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. O₂ (息 • 吹) 00:15, 28 October 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I wish to help out with the review of image licenses on Commons particulary those in the "needing human review" section along with being able to self-check my own images. I have uploaded Flickr images with correct licensing several times already and I am knowledgeable about image copyrights and tags. I am also an experienced editor at the English Wikipedia with about 14000 edits. Thanks. Hdtcommons83 05:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - A user I respect highly. Giggy\^Talk 08:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ρх₥α 21:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. O₂ (息 • 吹) 22:51, 30 October 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I hope to help out with reviewing images. I understand the CC licenses and have upload a few images from flickr with the right licenses. PxMa 00:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support — all looks fine :-) --Boricuæddie 22:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please review the relevant instructions at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Giggy\^Talk 00:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I know my way around and wouldn't mind helping out. I'm also an administrator on the English Wikipedia (en:User:RG2, verification) where I regularly deal with image copyright issues. RG2 10:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. Happy reviewing! --Boricuæddie 15:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been an administrator in the Spanish Wikipedia from 2005 (it means that I've been managing images in there before the local upload were deactivated). Besides, I've been uploading images here from the very beginning (verification can be seen in my local page at the Spanish Wikipedia: "hereby I declare that I am the owner of the username ecemaml only in commons, wikisource, wikcionario, wikiquote, wikinoticias, meta, :an:, :ca:, :en:, :fr:, :gl:, :it:, and :pt:."). Best regards --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 21:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. O₂ (息 • 吹) 22:53, 02 November 2007 (GMT)

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I recently ran for adminship here at commons, and I concluded based on the discussion that I need a bit more time for that. However, I still am very knowledgeable about copyrights, have done a lot of image work at en, and have over 2000 edits here. I believe I can do this knowledgefully and faithfully. Patstuart 15:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - I didn't comment in the RfA (I would've been neutral too), but I think you'll be OK with flickr reviewing. Good luck, Giggy\^Talk 23:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Passed. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. --Boricuæddie 03:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've been around for a while and am familiar with Commons licensing policies; I am also cognizant of the possibility that Flickr users didn't create the images they've uploaded. Therefore I'd like to help out with reviewing Flickr images. --Sopoforic 11:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Could you perhaps show us a few images you've uploaded from flickr (or upload some now) so that we can judge your understanding a bit better? Thanks, ~ Riana ⁂ 02:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Image:Steve Macdonald.jpg, Image:Bill Roper.jpg, Image:Tanya Huff at OVFF 2005.jpg, and Image:Michael Longcor at DucKon 16.jpg for example that I've found with correct licenses, and Image:Leslie fish DCP 0716.jpg which I convinced the creator to release under an appropriate license. My user page has the complete list. Of course, that doesn't show a great deal--the flickr upload bot wouldn't let me add an image with an inappropriate license! But you may make of it what you will. --Sopoforic 02:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Looks fine! (Sorry - I went through your upload logs, should have done the obvious thing and look on your userpage :) ) ~ Riana ⁂ 06:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support — I'm sure you'll be a great help around here. --Boricuæddie 21:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support as Riana. Jahiegel 08:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Passed. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}, and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. Good luck, Giggy\^Talk 00:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi, I'd like to help with reviewing flickr images. I've read over the process and the licensing, and I'd like to help. ¡Gracias! Mønobi 17:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment The only problem I can foresee is that you are quite new and have not demonstrated experience of uploading images - whether from flickr or otherwise - or your knowledge of copyright. Perhaps you could upload a few images from flickr first, so others can know that you understand what you are doing? :) Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 18:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment - I'm sorry, but I can't support you considering you haven't made any uploads. If you upload a few flickr images, it will better help us gauge your ability in this position. Thanks for applying, and good luck. — Giggy 22:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Willing to assume good faith based on those two uploads. Please keep them coming! — Giggy 08:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, I've uploaded two images from flickr :). Mønobi 02:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose as unable to adequately judge this user on two image uploads. Adambro 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  2 more uploaded, both seem OK. — Giggy 22:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Neutral Hmm... I'm not sure. On one hand I'm sure that this user will do their best to keep Commons free of copyright violations, on the other hand I'm not sure whether the user already is experienced enough. Leaning towards support though. Who's gonna close this? -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  I've contacted Eddie about a closure. — Giggy 05:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

There is no consensus on whether to promote Monobi to flickrreview status at this time. I believe it is better if the user acquires more experience and re-applies in the future, so there are no doubts or regrets. --Boricuæddie 22:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hi there! I'd like to help out with reviewing Flickr images. I've got a number of uploads that I've made myself to Commons, along with a quite a few more I've moved off of ENWP using Magnus's CommonsHelper tool (here, here, and here, for example). Obviously, those aren't necessarily Flickr images, but I think I could do the job of identifying images with valid or invalid copyright information. Thank you for your consideration. Cheers! Esrever 06:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment - I can't see any flickr images in your uploads - could you please upload a few just so we can be sure? Thanks, — Giggy 22:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy to do it. Check out this image, this image, this image, this image, and this image. Please let me know if you need me to do any more such uploads. Cheers! Esrever 19:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Support - All good. — Giggy 05:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Passed - As there is no opposition to this request, 10 days after its creation, I am going to pass it. — Giggy 00:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

I've uploaded a fair share of Flickr images and I think I have the requisite experience and grasp of policy to become a worthy reviewer. Astrojunta 09:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment - Not really related to reviewing Flickr images but could you consider creating a user page to give other users a brief idea of who you are, links to other WMF projects where you are active etc. Regards. Adambro 12:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Unsuccessful - The user hasn't edited since creating this request, and there have been no uploads. There is also no support. At this time, I don't see a consensus to allow the user to review. — Giggy 00:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.

Hello, bonjour, ciao, hola, etc...
I see there's a certain backlog of Flickr images awaiting human review and would like to help. I've been uploading Flickr photos of New Zealand for a while now because I've been working intensively on the new Wikiproject NZ on fr:wp. I have also uploaded numerous non-Flickr images (some mine - see Kourou for examples -, and a few transfers from en:wp), and think I know the licenses fairly well, certainly in regards to Flickr images. My discussion page is fairly quiet, my activity on Commons being mostly limited to uploading and categorizing.
I am an OTRS volunteer with access to the permissions-commons queue, admin on meta and fr:wp and arbitrator on fr:wp.
Thank you for your time and happy editing,
Arria Belli | parlami 22:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - No reason not too, and a highly trusted user. — Giggy 00:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• strong Support per Giggy--Nick1915 01:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]