User talk:David.Monniaux/archives/2

archives: 1

C'est pobablement un lantana camara originaire d'Amérique du Nord (Mexique, Texas).--Pixeltoo 15:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• A vous qui semblez etre bilingue, pourriez vous mes rendre un service?
• J'ai un probleme avec Thuresson Il ne cesse de me mettre des messages en anglais auquel je ne comprends pas la langue, pourriez vous traduire ces messages et lui dire d'utiliser des messages bilingues préétablis avec des Modéles: {{David.Monniaux/archives/2}} de tel sorte que tous le monde puisse le comprendre meme quant on n'est pas englophone.

--Utilisateur-MG-fr*** <@> 09:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Para la imagen del bucardo tengo un e-mail de la Guardia Civil que me da permiso para utilizarla libremente. De la de Amélie Nothomb tengo una foto original que me la ha mandado la propia Amélie junto con una carta en la que me da permiso para utilizarla. ¿Cuál es el problema?

Solicito que me sea permitido de nuevo la subida a Commons. Gracias.

Pour l'image du bucardo j'ai un e-mail de la Garde Civile qui me donne autorisation pour l'utiliser librement. De de celle d'Amélie Nothomb j'ai une photo originale qui lui m'a envoyé Amélie elle-même avec une lettre dans laquelle elle me donne autorisation pour l'utiliser. Quel est le problème ?

Je sollicite que mo'est permise de nouveau la montée à Commons. Merci.

User:Digigalos 12_I_06

Pour la photo d'Amélie Nothomb: je viens d'écrire à la photographe, et elle m'a répondu qu'elle n'avait pas donné d'autorisation de diffusion. En matière de photographie, le droit d'auteur n'appartient pas au sujet, mais au photographe. Je serais donc très curieux de voir ce courrier électronique de Mlle Nothomb.

D'une façon générale, si vous obtenez des permissions particulières pour des contenus a priori protégés, vous devez l'indiquer sur la page, et faire suivre copie des permissions à permissions@wikimedia.org.

Par ailleurs, je vous rappelle que les ayant-droit doivent non seulement accepter que nous mettions leurs photos sur notre site, mais aussi que ces photos soient placées sous une licence libre autorisant la redistribution, les travaux dérivés et les usages commerciaux.

Je vais donc vous débloquer, mais je vous serai gré de bien vouloir fournir des précisions sur les autorisations que vous auriez obtenues. :Merci !David.Monniaux 11:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me has aclarado muchas cosas. De hora en adelante seré más cuidadoso a la hora de subir imágenes. Gracias.

Tu m'as clarifié beaucoup de choses. D'heure je serai désormais plus soigneux au moment de monter des images. Merci.--Digigalos 21:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did not take it myself. but it is an old picture which is more than 40 years old. and in countries such as Iraq there has been no regules for old images where one can find such images everywere.

Diyako 13:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I'm a new user of commons (I come from it:wikipedia) and I want do something in commons. For change the old template of the public domain must be made by the user that upload the image, or can do I? I'm sorry for my horrible english. I hope that you can know this sentence. Thank you --RED DEVIL 666 16:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the template of public domain is old. I want know if the new template (for example PD-old) can is put by me, or can is put only by the user that upload the image.

Vorrei sapere se il vecchio template di pubblico dominio può essere sostituito con uno di quelli nuovi da me o deve essere sostituito dall'utente che ha caricato l'immagine.

Don't answer in the page that is open by "PRIDE" because I made a mistake in my signature but, actually, I can't correct it because the prefereces page is wrong. --RED DEVIL 666 16:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you --RED DEVIL 666 17:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, Colombian copyright laws are quite similar to European laws. In that case, we are in trouble. For more info (in Spanish, sorry): http://derautor.gov.co/ --Julianortega 22:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David,

I contacted Zach throught flicker, which allows to send messages to its users. The important part of this conservation is at User:Guety/zachklein. At this time Zach Klein started to licence his pictures as CC-BY and I thought he might do this as well with his former pictures (all rights reserved). His answer seemed to allow to use his pictures as CC-BY, he only wandet to know where they are used. So I created User:Guety/zachklein to show it and send him the URL.

-guety 03:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merci beaucoup pour la traduction, je considérent donc qu'un logo dériver d'un logo officiel sous licence {{CopyrightByWikimedia}} doit etre remis sous licence {{CopyrightByWikimedia}} et que par consequent j'abandonne tous droit sur ce logo que je lègue donc gratuitement à Wikimédia, je garde seulement l'honneur d'avoir contribuer a cette nouvel image.
• Mon point de vue est-il correct?
• --Utilisateur-MG-fr*** <@> 09:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vous m'avez indiqué à propos des images que j'ai ajouté d'envoyer une copie du mail de l'autorisation reçue de la part du photographe. Pouvez-vous me réexpliquer ce que je dois faire en français, j'ai pas tout compris en anglais...De plus, un autre contibuteur m'a dit qu'une simple autorisation pour une utilisation sur wikipédia n'était pas suffisante, c'est pourtant ce que j'ai reçut, faut-il alors que je change la licence CC pour une autre plus adaptée? merci d'avance :EyOne|EyOne]] Di$cuter 11:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Le poblème c'est moi j'ai bien notifié dans mon mail pour un usage sur wikipédia mais je peux difficilement demander au photographe (semi-professionnel en plus) à ce que ses images deviennent totalement libres et utilisables n'importe ou n'importe comment. N'y a t'il pas une licences permettant de restreindre l'usage à Wikipédia et ses articles? :EyOne|EyOne]] Di$cuter 12:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Merci, je vais faire part de ces conditions au photographes et lui demander si il les accepte ou non. Dans le cas échéant, je serait obligé de retirer toutes ses images de wikipédia. :EyOne|EyOne]] Di$cuter 17:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi! We have a template of the license of Images of Library of Congress of USA? --RED DEVIL 666 09:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. --RED DEVIL 666 10:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found [here]. --RED DEVIL 666 23:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 10:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have put a clarified version of the proposal at Commons_talk:Licensing#Assume PD for Images older than 100 years. I belive much confusion arose because I chose a bad title for the discussion. Please have another look -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 22:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo pour la qualité de tes explications à divers endroits de Commons sur les copyright. Enfin, quelqu'un que je comprends sur ce sujet (pas très simple il est vrai). J'espère que je ne viole pas ces règles.Romary 11:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Yesterday, 15.01, during the festivity of San Ponziano in Spoleto (Perugia - Italy). Starlight 17:17, 16 gen 2006 (CET)

Thanks for your help. --Starlight 22:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you deleted two images listed in Template:Deletion requests#Image:Amy Proctor.JPG and Image:Amy_proctor2.JPG. As far as I can remember, those images were uploaded in a right license, but was whether picture was worth keeping in Commons. Explanation please? Thank you. -- WB 08:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I didn't know the whole story. I think we can safely assume that no permissions were given. -- WB 09:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about directing people to the commons mailing list? Getting them to fill out a form, with an automatic subject "Suspect copyright violation" shouldn't be too hard technically (and ability to fill out a form/write an email is something we can at least assume of our readers, I hope! unlike wiki-editing ability). If we can make all emails have that heading, then people on the list who don't care could filter them out. Or we could in fact just make a separate list, in case the current one ever picks up... pfctdayelise 14:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I take your second point, but as for your first...yeah, it would be nice to have language localisation. But if we don't have it for the commons in general (yet), I can't see that they're going to make a special effort to introduce it for "legal enquiries". Every page is in English by default, unless you log in and change your lang settings, right? Unless they change that, it doesn't matter what we say, ("legal enquiries" or "contact" or "village pump"), it won't be enough - unless we list the 100 translations along side it! Feeling comfortable emailing a foreign language list is one thing; managing to find how to do that is another!

Uh...I think I'm agreeing with you now. :) pfctdayelise 23:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What type of car is it? The logo could be an Alfa-Romeo, but it's hard to tell. // Liftarn

my software is MsPaint, unfortuanately... Could you please recommend me something? Ymar 14:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so glad you removed that... Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 00:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, I was wondering if you would mind providing a short translation of the message I left at User talk:Lucette Defrise. I'm not certain that they totally understand Commons:Licensing. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please explain the legal basis of Template:PD-JORF and Template:PD-JORF-nor-conso in French law? I understand very limited French only.--Jusjih 09:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an administrator at English Wikisource, I have heard of Soufron after a debate about whether United Nations resolutions would be admissible there. The external links from Template:PD-JORF-nor-conso are not working very well. Merci beaucoup.--Jusjih 13:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Visitez Commons:Featured_picture_removal_candidates/Image:A_small_cup_of_coffee.JPG ici [1] s'il vous plait LoopZilla 09:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probablement un molène (Verbascum). -- Pixeltoo 08:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David,

My name is Fernanda Viégas and I have been studying Wikipedia for a while now (you can see a paper I published on the subject here). I would like to ask you a few questions about your activities as a Wikipedia image creator. I am fascinated by the pictorial side of Wikipedia and it would be great to hear about this community from one of its members. Would you be available to participate an email survey this week? Thanks, — Fviegas | talk

Found the category ForAnthere. Do you need that? This category is not categorized. Can deleted? -- skINMATE 15:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David.Monniaux/archives/2,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 22:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you recorded the prononciation of Paris. Would record an prononciation for the city of Calais? Thank you.81.158.232.75 02:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merci David :-) Jastrow 13:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je sais plus trop ou j'ai lu que tu avais accès au ticket OTRS, donc je peux faire erreur sur la personne. Serait-il possible que tu vérifie ce ticket pour voir si il y a un message en plus de la permission ? Je demande cela juste pour en être sûr. Merci beaucoup. ~ bayo or talk 13:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je viens vous demander de l'aide. En effet, j'ai ajouté sur les pages suivantes : Germaine Lubin, Ettore Bastianini, Mario Del Monaco, Felia Litvinne Maria Callas et Feodor Chaliapine des extraits musicaux tirés de vieux disques pour certains. Ne sachant quelle licence mettre sur Wikimedia Commons, j'ai indiqué GDPL (la licence libre). Or, je viens de me rendre compte qu'il faudrait plutôt mettre courtecitation pour faire état du droit de citation me semble-t-il ? J'ai voulu rectifier le côté licence mais impossible d'accéder à ces fichiers ? Par ailleurs, faut-il mettre la catégorie 32 (classical). En fait je suis perplexe ce matin quant aux ajouts que j'ai fait. Merci pour votre aide et s'il y a lieu je supprimerais immédiatement les extraits susvisés. Comptant sur votre aide, merci d'avance. Cordialement. Utilisateur:Gegeours

On August 29th you deleted FlickrLickr uploaded images Image:LongRoad2.jpg and Image:PowerLine1.jpg with explanation "copyrighted". According to Google cache, LongRoad2.jpg and PowerLine1.jpg had been tagged with CC-BY and {{Flickr-change-of-license}} explaining the situation. Please note that FlickrLickr uploads are not mistakes on the uploader's part, as the images for review are harvested automatically from Flickr's list of free images. Was there an external request to delete these images? --Para 07:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]