User talk:Laim

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Laim!

Papa Guye, Miron Marcevich, Marko Devich

[edit]

this photos are from official site of "Metallist"

Eto.zebra (talk) 13:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ну и что, что с официального. Фотографии защищены авторским правом, а вы их сюда загружаете под свободной лицензией. Если продолжите загружать, то будите заблокированы! Laim (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Но они для свободного использования Eto.zebra (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

И почему например не удален этот и остальные фото отсюда и других статей? Они ведь тоже с того источника http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Konushenko.jpg Eto.zebra (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Все несвободные изображения ныне живущих людей со временем будут удалены. А с чего вы взяли, что фотографии для свободного использования? Laim (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что они предоставлены на сайте для ознакомления с информацией об игроках, то есть для свободного использования. Eto.zebra (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Я вам ещё раз повторяю, что весь материал на сайте защищён авторским правом (Copyright © 2000-2009 ФК "Металлист" Харьков. Все права сохранены.) Понятно? Laim (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion noms for footballer photos

[edit]

Hi, in the footballer photos you've nominated for deletion, I noticed that almost all the licenses were done by bots, and so I think they are all valid. Sometimes, Flickr users change the CC license to be more restrictive, but as you can read here, "Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license. ".

Also, when you're nominating multiple pictures from the same source with the same issues, as you did with the ManU photos, it probably would have been better to do a Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. Cheers. --Ytoyoda (talk) 16:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you Ytoyoda! I just didn't know it :) 17:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Просьба

[edit]

Пожалуйста, будьте вежливее. Не стоит оскорблять других, даже если Вы считаете, что они оскорбили Вас. --Panther (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Скриншоты

[edit]

Привет. Загруженные мною скриншоты можешь удалить. Я их лучше опубликую как несвободные. Perceive (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо, но только не здесь, а в русскоязычном разделе Википедии. Laim (talk) 11:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting tired

[edit]

Would you please stop reverting well-formed problem tags to replace them with copyvio tags? When a file is tagged, it is taken care of already. We already know that it is non-free, we just leave a chance for the uploader to communicate the permission he might have got. If you want to deal with copyvio, read the guidelines and hunt for the ones not spotted already... --Eusebius (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ik_ben_Ajacied.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ананко

[edit]

Файл Ананко и прочих снят лично мной. Че вы там вдруг собрались его удалять не пойму. на общем форуме википедии, как раз сейчас разбираем групповой снимок-кто есть кто. Когда кого-то выясняем- я его выдергиваю из группового портрета, если крупнее нет ( у меня аккумулятор сел быстро_. Обсуждение ВОТ . Спасибо что отняли у меня время и сбили с мысли во время писания статьи. Мало того, что дурацкий викискладовский движок у меня на русский не переходит, так еще админы помогают, чем могут. --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 13:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC) и посмотрите ужу наконец, кто владелец сайта 164500.ру. Найдете удивительное сходство с моим ником. --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

В указанном Вами источнике я не нашёл фотографии Ананко. По возможности просто укажите верный источник. Laim (talk) 13:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Доступ к файлам на 164500 дается после регистрации и моего личного разрешения. Такое разрешение есть только у трех человек. источник-же верный. --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Объясню еще кое-что, конкретно для вас: если владельцем авторских прав является человек его загрузивший, он может вообще не указывать источник. А может указать. Причем может указать что угодно, что взбредёт в его светлую голову - ибо не принципиально. Принципиально:« Это моё фото и я гружу его под лицензией "Делайте с ним чё хотите". » --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Прошу вас убрать шаблон. Если вам что-то не нравиться-копия этого разговора есть на форуме-я перенес. Выражайте свое несогласие там-посмотрим, что люди скажут. --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Убрал шаблон, но такой шлак лучше сюда не грузить. Laim (talk) 20:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Шлак - это единственное фото известной личности под свободной лицензией, про которую есть статьи в нескольких языковых разделах? Хм... Интересное альтернативное мнение. --Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Bobby_Convey.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

BrokenSphere (Talk) 05:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Darth Vader in Star Wars exhibition (2008).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ANDROBETA 20:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Фото Цисельского М.П

[edit]

Добрый день! А у Вас есть какое-нибудь разрешение на использование фотографий из семейного альбома Цисельского М. П.? --Laim 13:11, 14 февраля 2012 (UTC)

Эта тема уже обсуждалась в Wikimedia:Commons, когда выложенные мной фотографии выставлялись на удаление, и мне удалось убедить в том, что я это делаю на законных основаниях. Предложение об удалении файлов было снято. На всякий случай еще раз напомню, что я являюсь владельцем всех семейных фотографий Цисельского М.П. на правах законного наследника. Я бы выложил эти файлы в русской Википедии, но они используются также в статье в украинской и английской Википедии. Поэтому убедительная просьба снять с файла пометку об удалении. Заранее благодарю. С уважением, --Островский Александр 13:34, 14 февраля 2012 (UTC)

Вопрос

[edit]

Здравствуйте,у меня вопрос по загрузке изображение если оно сделано мною? Vova42RUS

Deletion

[edit]

why are you deleting the pictures I have uploaded? 1dayFloripa (talk) 13:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

вопрос по лицензии

[edit]

Я загрузил файл Чорба Геннадий Павлович.jpg , но вечером получил сообщение, что файл ставится на удаление. Изменились правила или что? Метаданные есть, фото делал я давно, сейчас просто решил залить, в чем проблема или не так оформил я? --Kodru (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос снимается, уже все решено, это тот участник не понятно почему поставил шаблон об удалении... --Kodru (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

21:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]