User talk:Maher27777
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
![]() |
File:Ghada_Adel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Before uploading this file from flicr.com, I tried to imitate the license of
, which also was uploaded from flicr, so the deleting was surprising!--Maher27777 (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
- The license for File:TéaLeoniJun07.jpg has been received through OTRS, as noted on its file description page. The copyright holder has, for whatever reasons, elected to use different terms for the distribution done through Flickr. Therefore, you can't use File:TéaLeoniJun07.jpg as a blueprint for how to transfer files from Flickr in general. Please read the instructions at Commons:Flickr files and use one of the automated or semi-automated tools to avoid mistakes.
- Also note that the Flickr uploader of the file you tried to upload here is quite obviously not the copyright holder, so even if the file had been tagged with a free license on Flickr, it should not be transferred here, because only the legitimate copyright holder can issue a valid license. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Deprecated License
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Maurice Gamelin.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 14:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Al-Muntasir_voting1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Idris_I_&_Mahmud_Al_Muntassir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trycatch (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Donald Duck-The Spirit of '43-cropped version.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Donald Duck-The Spirit of '43.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- You can't be sure. Disney made the film so they should have all the copyright, if the government has asked them to do a film like that it doesn't imply that it's under government copyright. And, it's not a screenshot of a film that you have but from youtube! --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 11:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
لا داعي لهذه الحرب الباردة في [1] --ليبي صح (talk) 21:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
أخي أنا لست مصراً من رأسي لدي مصادر وذكرته في [2]،تحياتي لك --ليبي صح (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Green Book study center
[edit]Do you have a picture of one that isn't burned? A picture of a burned building doesn't really illustrate the purpose for which the building was constructed. 24.22.217.162 07:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Libya pic
[edit]Just wanted to say thanks for that amazing picture of a girl holding the sign out of the car window. What a statement! Thanks again, (and if you're there, stay safe...) Ocaasi (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Flag-map_of_historic_Palestine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlaier (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello ! We use this file on the French Wikinews and I would like to know if the people on the tank are rebels or just normal people (civilians). They doesn't seems to be rebels, since some of them are children, but the description in Russian uses the word повстанец wich means "rebel". Could you give me a confirmation ? Thanks ! --Xiglofre (talk), 20:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC).
Your exercise in irredentism
[edit]Since there was never any time in history when the flag shown in File:Flag-map_of_historic_Palestine.jpg flew over the area shown in that file, it's quite unclear what the purpose of that image is, other than to express aggressive irredentist territorial claims (or possibly to proclaim your hatred of Jews)... AnonMoos (talk) 04:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- It would have been both more accurate and less offensive if it were under a name such as "Map of Palestinian Arab territorial aspirations.jpg" or similar. Under its actual name, it reminded some people of denialist 1960s Nasserist-type propaganda, or the wilder statements of people like Ahmad al-Shuqeiri, and so attracted to itself controversy. Arabic Wikipedia has gone over to File:Flag map of Palestine.svg, which I regard as a highly-positive change... AnonMoos (talk) 13:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
When transferring files from other Wikimedia projects, please use CommonsHelper in the future to ensure that you provide traceable source information and that you upload the full-resolution version of the file. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Something is missing with commons helper. All Steps concluded in the browse (from my computer) button, that is, the same old indirect method of uploading!--Maher27777 (talk) 23:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
- I actually used CommonsHelper to clean up the file description, but if it doesn't work for uploading, as it says at the top of the page, you might want to try CommonsHelper2 instead. And if you don't use any tools, it is still important that you upload the full-resolution version and link to the original file. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:AhmedSha2008.jpg was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Donald_Duck-The_Spirit_of_'43-cropped_version.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.139.62 17:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Faisalajab.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Tabercil (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Latakia harbour.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Latakia harbour.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons
[edit]Hello Maher27777!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.
Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque
[edit]Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque.
Regards. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 10:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Flag-map of Kingdom of Libya svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Flag-map of Kingdom of Libya.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Benghazi caricatures of Gadafi02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
[edit]https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck, cropped version.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Photographer 17:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Ar Redwan mosque, Casablanca.jpg
- File:Bab as Salam mosque, Casablanca.jpg
- File:Cil mosque, Casablanca1.jpg
- File:Cil mosque, Casablanca2.jpg
- File:Darb Ghellaf mosque, Casablanca.JPG
- File:King Abd al Aziz mosque, Casablanca.JPG
Yours sincerely, PierreSelim (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ameen Rihani.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Princes Edward, Henry, and Albert Time cover 1927.jpg
[edit]Hi Maher27777, I noticed the great Time cover you uploaded. There's only a couple of errors in the file title and comment: The three bachelor brothers are actually (left to right) Edward, George and Henry (in the hussars uniform rather than naval), and the George depicted in the cover is Prince George, the late Duke of Kent, not Prince Albert (later George VI), who was already married in 1927. I've already fixed the order on Prince Henry's Wikipedia page, but you might want to change file title and comment on Commons. Manfercas (talk) 16:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Princes Edward, Henry, and Albert Time cover 1927.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Princes Edward, Henry, and Albert Time cover 1927.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Maher. I'm not sure the picture of the princes has been taken in the U.S.A.; indeed it's very likely it has been shot in UK so the source country is UK and the PD-US seems not to be sufficient. As for the place the name of the photographer should be known in order to determine if this picture is public domain in the UK. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The country of origin is USA (the presumed country of the author)..the file may need a clarification, or more information, not a deletion. I've used the perpetually used appropriate licensing mientioned in {{PD-US-not renewed-TIME}}.--Maher27777 (talk) 22:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi again. That's exactly what the template says, I quote : "This file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, the source(s) of the incorporated work(s) is/are missing essential source information. The author and source of the incorporated work must be given, so that others can verify the copyright status. ". Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The country of origin is USA (the presumed country of the author)..the file may need a clarification, or more information, not a deletion. I've used the perpetually used appropriate licensing mientioned in {{PD-US-not renewed-TIME}}.--Maher27777 (talk) 22:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ahmed Bukhatir - London 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ℯxplicit 04:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
[edit]![]() |
The Category Barnstar | |
Thanks for categorizing films. — Racconish 💬 07:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC) |
Copyright status: File:Madame Sans-Gene 1925.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Madame Sans-Gene 1925.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Madame Sans-Gene 1925.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pretty Ladies.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Pretty Ladies.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pretty Ladies.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hi Maher27777. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks for reminding me. I'd just thought that those procedures are unnecessary because I'm the up-loader of the file named for deletion (because I'd found an identical version just after uploading the file)!--Maher27777 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading. Could you please confirm she intones Az-Zumar? Cheers, — Racconish 💬 09:38, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying me. Not az-Zumar, but Ibrahim.Maher27777 (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Abdelmonam-ibrahim.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Abdelmonam-ibrahim.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Abdelmonam-ibrahim.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |