In mathematics, the binomial series is a generalization of the polynomial that comes from a binomial formula expression like for a nonnegative integer . Specifically, the binomial series is the MacLaurin series for the function , where and . Explicitly,

(1)

where the power series on the right-hand side of (1) is expressed in terms of the (generalized) binomial coefficients

Note that if α is a nonnegative integer n then the xn + 1 term and all later terms in the series are 0, since each contains a factor of (nn). Thus, in this case, the series is finite and gives the algebraic binomial formula.

Convergence

edit

Conditions for convergence

edit

Whether (1) converges depends on the values of the complex numbers α and x. More precisely:

  1. If |x| < 1, the series converges absolutely for any complex number α.
  2. If |x| = 1, the series converges absolutely if and only if either Re(α) > 0 or α = 0, where Re(α) denotes the real part of α.
  3. If |x| = 1 and x ≠ −1, the series converges if and only if Re(α) > −1.
  4. If x = −1, the series converges if and only if either Re(α) > 0 or α = 0.
  5. If |x| > 1, the series diverges except when α is a non-negative integer, in which case the series is a finite sum.

In particular, if α is not a non-negative integer, the situation at the boundary of the disk of convergence, |x| = 1, is summarized as follows:

  • If Re(α) > 0, the series converges absolutely.
  • If −1 < Re(α) ≤ 0, the series converges conditionally if x ≠ −1 and diverges if x = −1.
  • If Re(α) ≤ −1, the series diverges.

Identities to be used in the proof

edit

The following hold for any complex number α:

 
  (2)
  (3)

Unless   is a nonnegative integer (in which case the binomial coefficients vanish as   is larger than  ), a useful asymptotic relationship for the binomial coefficients is, in Landau notation:

  (4)

This is essentially equivalent to Euler's definition of the Gamma function:

 

and implies immediately the coarser bounds

  (5)

for some positive constants m and M .

Formula (2) for the generalized binomial coefficient can be rewritten as

  (6)

Proof

edit

To prove (i) and (v), apply the ratio test and use formula (2) above to show that whenever   is not a nonnegative integer, the radius of convergence is exactly 1. Part (ii) follows from formula (5), by comparison with the p-series

 

with  . To prove (iii), first use formula (3) to obtain

  (7)

and then use (ii) and formula (5) again to prove convergence of the right-hand side when   is assumed. On the other hand, the series does not converge if   and  , again by formula (5). Alternatively, we may observe that for all  ,  . Thus, by formula (6), for all  . This completes the proof of (iii). Turning to (iv), we use identity (7) above with   and   in place of  , along with formula (4), to obtain

 

as  . Assertion (iv) now follows from the asymptotic behavior of the sequence  . (Precisely,   certainly converges to   if   and diverges to   if  . If  , then   converges if and only if the sequence   converges  , which is certainly true if   but false if  : in the latter case the sequence is dense  , due to the fact that   diverges and   converges to zero).

Summation of the binomial series

edit

The usual argument to compute the sum of the binomial series goes as follows. Differentiating term-wise the binomial series within the disk of convergence |x| < 1 and using formula (1), one has that the sum of the series is an analytic function solving the ordinary differential equation (1 + x)u′(x) − αu(x) = 0 with initial condition u(0) = 1.

The unique solution of this problem is the function u(x) = (1 + x)α. Indeed, multiplying by the integrating factor (1 + x)α−1 gives

 

so the function (1 + x)−αu(x) is a constant, which the initial condition tells us is 1. That is, u(x) = (1 + x)α is the sum of the binomial series for |x| < 1.

The equality extends to |x| = 1 whenever the series converges, as a consequence of Abel's theorem and by continuity of (1 + x)α.

Negative binomial series

edit

Closely related is the negative binomial series defined by the MacLaurin series for the function  , where   and  . Explicitly,

 

which is written in terms of the multiset coefficient

 

When α is a positive integer, several common sequences are apparent. The case α = 1 gives the series 1 + x + x2 + x3 + ..., where the coefficient of each term of the series is simply 1. The case α = 2 gives the series 1 + 2x + 3x2 + 4x3 + ..., which has the counting numbers as coefficients. The case α = 3 gives the series 1 + 3x + 6x2 + 10x3 + ..., which has the triangle numbers as coefficients. The case α = 4 gives the series 1 + 4x + 10x2 + 20x3 + ..., which has the tetrahedral numbers as coefficients, and similarly for higher integer values of α.

The negative binomial series includes the case of the geometric series, the power series[1]   (which is the negative binomial series when  , convergent in the disc  ) and, more generally, series obtained by differentiation of the geometric power series:   with  , a positive integer.[2]

History

edit

The first results concerning binomial series for other than positive-integer exponents were given by Sir Isaac Newton in the study of areas enclosed under certain curves. John Wallis built upon this work by considering expressions of the form y = (1 − x2)m where m is a fraction. He found that (written in modern terms) the successive coefficients ck of (−x2)k are to be found by multiplying the preceding coefficient by m − (k − 1)/k (as in the case of integer exponents), thereby implicitly giving a formula for these coefficients. He explicitly writes the following instances[a]

 
 
 

The binomial series is therefore sometimes referred to as Newton's binomial theorem. Newton gives no proof and is not explicit about the nature of the series. Later, on 1826 Niels Henrik Abel discussed the subject in a paper published on Crelle's Journal, treating notably questions of convergence. [4]

See also

edit

Footnotes

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ [3] In fact this source gives all non-constant terms with a negative sign, which is not correct for the second equation; one must assume this is an error of transcription.

Citations

edit
  1. ^ George Andrews (2018), "The geometric series in calculus" (PDF), The American Mathematical Monthly, 105 (1): 36–40, doi:10.1080/00029890.1998.12004846
  2. ^ Knopp, Konrad (1944), Theory and applications of infinite series, Blackie and Son, §22.
  3. ^ Coolidge 1949.
  4. ^ Abel 1826.

References

edit
edit