"Creationusuem" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Creationusuem and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 17#Creationusuem until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 23:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tone is biased. Sections of overview should be moved to criticism area.

edit

Move the criticism to the criticism area 2600:1009:B06C:BEFC:6C6A:F4E9:D77A:7CB7 (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

There is a longstanding consensus to use that word here. Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why? who says it is science? Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply