Talk:District councils of Hong Kong
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Official full name
editRe edits by user:Alanmak: [1] [2] - The full name of the territory is "Hong Kong Special Adminsitrative Region of the People's Republic of China". If anybody has got any evidence that its full name is indeed "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region", instead of the one mentioned above, please kindly present them for discussion. Thanks. — Instantnood 10:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- I thought there's a consensus before. And the format is: "Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China". -- Jerry Crimson Mann 08:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, and it shouldn't be capitalised. The article is now at special administrative region (People's Republic of China), and therefore, it should be " [[Hong Kong]], a [[special administratie region (People's Republic of China)|]] of the [[People's Republic of China]] ". But what if we've to use its official full name? " [[Hong Kong|Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China]] " or " [[Hong Kong|Hong Kong Special Administrative Region]] of the [[People's Republic of China]] "? User:Alanmak has claimed " Hong Kong Special Administrative Region " is its full name, and that it shouldn't be mixed up with the name of the sovereign state, since they're two different levels. — Instantnood 12:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Romanizations
editThere is no provision at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (China-related articles) for use of zhuyin as zhuyin is neither a Chinese script, nor a romanization. There also is no established consensus or precedent for using zhuyin (just flip to any Taiwan-related article and you will not find it). Its use here is further unnecessary as this is not even a Taiwan-related article and HK does not used zhuyin. The Manual of Style calls for using Wade Giles only if there is a historical usage of W-G; no such past usage exists for "District Council of Hong Kong". --Jiang 03:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Zhuyin is not necessary, as per the first paragraph of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), an official policy - " any non-Latin-alphabet native name should be given within the first line of the article (with a Latin-alphabet transliteration if the English name does not correspond to a transliteration of the native name). ". — Instantnood 04:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Edits by user:Alanmak
editI have reverted user:Alanmak's replacement of inline-style presentation of romanisation with box-style, with other minor edits. [3] — Instantnood 16:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Proposal to rename this section
editI propose this page is renamed 'District Councils of Hong Kong'. At present, in the singular, it suggests that there is one council.
The Wikipedia preference for singular should not override the need for clarity. Earthlyreason (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- As you can see, I have now renamed to "Councils". Earthlyreason (talk) 09:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
More about this
editThis is a good official source. It's already cited, but has more to offer: District Administration. Earthlyreason (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on District Councils of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522074318/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=45442&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19990120&sear_year=1999 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=45442&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19990120&sear_year=1999
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629165410/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=96973&sid=27736844&con_type=1&d_str=20100415&fc=7 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=96973&sid=27736844&con_type=1&d_str=20100415&fc=7
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629174323/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=99867&sid=28731309&con_type=3&d_str=20100628&fc=1 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=99867&sid=28731309&con_type=3&d_str=20100628&fc=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629154711/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=15&art_id=3320&sid=4970081&con_type=1 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=15&art_id=3320&sid=4970081&con_type=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on District Councils of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522074330/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=34268&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20031229&sear_year=2003 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=34268&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20031229&sear_year=2003
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
History - dispute
editAnd it seem it contain quite a lot error. I don't bought (brought also) the book The Administrative History of the Hong Kong Government Agencies 1841–2002 yet, but "District Office" existed in the New Territories much earlier than it urban counterpart. Old District Office North Building opens in 1907. However, this article was talking about Council not the District. The "District Council", known at that time "District Board ", existed only after 1982. Thus pretty much all the history about "District council" before 1982 is not directly related. Matthew hk (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)