Talk:Mongul

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I wouldn't call Mongul the least well-known of Superman's enemies. I'd say Lord Satanus is the least well-known. Mongul's probably one of the most well-known, behind Lex Luthor, Darkseid and Brainiac.

Please sign your posts, so we know who is responding to who. In addition, i corrected some language that stated unequivocally that Mongul was a DC reinterpretation of Marvel's Thanos, whioch was in itself an interpretation of DC's Darkseid. The information wasn't referenced, so I changed the language to reflect the possibility and not absolutleness.Arcayne 18:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Monguljlu.png

edit
 

Image:Monguljlu.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Mongulmad.png

edit
 

Image:Mongulmad.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Fortheman.jpg

edit
 

Image:Fortheman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Black Mercy

edit

is there enough to warrant splitting Black Mercy into it's own article?--Marhawkman (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

superman vs mongul

edit

Mongul is not stronger than the silver age superman. superman has defeated mongul many times in the silver age.

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g.../warvssup6.jpg http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g.../warvssup7.jpg http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g.../warvssup8.jpg http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g.../warvssup9.jpg http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...warvssup10.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...legionmon6.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...ect/shrug2.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.48.117.74 (talk) 14:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

got Intact links? I'm gonna keep reverting until you actually show some proof.--Marhawkman (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have mailed you these link that they show superman that strikes mongul. --80.180.166.198-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.53.143.131 (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mongul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply