![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editGbooks hits:
- Petru Rareș: "Petru Rares" (312) + "Petru Rareș" (43) = 350
- Peter Rareș: "Peter Rares" (156) + "Peter Rareș" (4) = 160
- "Peter IV Rares" (17) + "Peter (Petru) IV Rareș" (1) + "Peter IV Rareș" (0)
Obviously, he is known by his original name without numerals.--Zoupan 08:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Petru Rareș/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Only a hard-headed Romanian patriot can publish such a delusional statement that Peter won the battle at Obertyn 'through superior tactics'. He was in fact badly beaten despite his numerical superiority. Shame on people who use Wiki to create their versions of world history.
== obertyn battle == The problem with documenting this battle is that most of easily accessible information online is coming from unverifiable Polish sources (see for instance the wikipedia's page regarding this battle). It is very unlikely that, given the location, time of the year, relative fighting strength and tactics of the two armies, the Moldavian forces to lose so many while the Poles so few. This alone tends to discredit that single (apparently) source of information that shows the Poles being victorious in a crushing manner. On the other hand, the statement in this article is equally unverified... |
Last edited at 16:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 02:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)