Talk:Refit
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Davidships in topic Article seems to have no sources to support many of its major claims
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Article seems to have no sources to support many of its major claims
editThe article seems to have no sources to support many of its major claims.
Many of the claims are about refitting as applied to large marine vessels or even drill rig platforms, but the two books mentioned are about refit of small pleasure boats or restoration of old vessels, and wouldn't likely have the material to support claims like refitting becoming "one of the most important activities inside a shipyard".
Might User:Davidships or others in the ships wikiproject have thoughts on the matter? Cheers. N2e (talk) 23:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't think that there is much point to this article. A para or two in Shipbuilding, to which Shiprepair is already a redirect, might be useful at a general level. Davidships (talk) 23:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)