Tawkir.ahmad
Welcome!
editHello, Tawkir.ahmad, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nachole Uprising, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hitro talk 09:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nachole Uprising
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nachole Uprising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Nachole_Uprising. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hitro talk 09:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Kanika Tiwari for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanika Tiwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanika Tiwari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk mail) 06:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this edit, you should be a aware that IMDb is not generally considered a reliable source by the Wikipedia community, because it chiefly contains user-generated content, meaning that regular people from the internet submit content to the site. As such, it is inherently unreliable. Other examples of unreliable user-generated sources are discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, Wikia.com and even Wikipedia itself. For more info on reliable sources, please see WP:RS. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Andrew Kishore
editHi Tawkir.ahmad. I noticed that you used biographybd.com as a source for information in a biography article, Andrew Kishore [1]. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that biographybd.com meets reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. As far as I can tell, the website is a group blog. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 03:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)