- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LeadPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. PROD removed back in 2009 by article creator. Sources are non-independent (e.g. press releases) or trivial (e.g. The Telegraph piece briefly mentions the company appears in a top-50 list). There's a lot in the FT Adviser but these seem to be thinly rehashed press releases (example), not independent analysis. – Teratix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, Software, and California. – Teratix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Longhornsg (talk) 18:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: routine coverage fails to meet NCORP. Owen× ☎ 19:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.