Talk:.32 NAA
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .32 NAA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
Performance, Ed Sanow, and References
[edit]Has anyone read the reference??? (http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/sanow.pdf) It's a complete critique of Sanow suggesting a strong conflict of interest and outright bad information. Furthermore, the reference doesn't address the performance of the .32NAA ammunition at all.
In addition, the section says .32NAA outperforms .380 ACP in energy when, to the contrary, the .380 article lists three types that exceed the 199 ft-lbs. I'm striking the entire sentence and we can reinsert a properly researched/referenced statement.MartinezMD (talk) 06:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- Firearms articles needing attention
- Wikipedia requested images of firearms
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- United States articles needing attention
- Unreferenced United States articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States
- WikiProject United States articles