Talk:Battle of Bergendal
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Bergendal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it (including military history) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Pakenham footnotes
[edit]I have checked footnotes 1 and 2, quoting Pakenham. The author wrote nothing of the sort. Granted, I have a different publisher, but also 1979. I will add my book. Vaaljapie (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)No, I was wrong: The info is there. Vaaljapie (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class South Africa articles
- Mid-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English