User talk:Kautilya3
![]() | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Casualties of the Israel–Hamas war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-http-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Genocide of Indigenous peoples on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
[edit]Have a look at this. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again [1]. Are these additions factual and leadworthy?
- This guy is the sock. The other one, they are edit warring with is also a sock. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- I know. I suspected as much. But, until they get tagged, I have to WP:AGF. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- have a look at This cat, created by this user. Was active at Northeast India propagating those POV WESEA stuff. They got their ID-name changed recently. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Have a look at this removal. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
On kuki national organization(KNO) and kuki national army(KNA)
[edit]the sub-miltant group aren't armed wings but rather allies you have mistaken it by saying that it is their armed wings on both the pages of KNA and KNO CrackerCrack919 (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Mohyal Brahmin
[edit]Hello, hope you are fine. Thanks for your logical comments on the talk page in response to my ping; I have removed the section though since the same was initiated by a sock! Cheers! Ekdalian (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
On Kuki National Army's number of troops
[edit]Hello, Kautilya3. I really appreciate your leaving me a comment, and watching the page and removing inappropriate edits. However, I want you to understand my last edit was to correct numbers: for example, this source said its troop number in Myanmar to be 200+, but before my edit, the article said it was 4000 while citing the same source I mentioned! I understand that it is natural for you to misunderstand my intentions in this edit, and regret that I should have mentioned this when publishing my edit. I hope you now understand me.
Thank you for reading this! Chirua (talk) 13:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Chirua, thanks for writing a response. Please use an edit summary such as "correcting as per source". Otherwise if you modify sourced content without stating a reason, it is liable to be reverted. Thanks for all your work! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for giving me advice. I will use an edit summary to avoid it. Chirua (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
About links and Manipur
[edit]I truly appreciate you taking the time to correct me. As I'm still new to this field, I'm prone to making mistakes. I understand it completely, and I will try to improve this in the future.
In the article on Manipur, I simply replaced the abbreviation with its more commonly known full form.
Tmanthara (talk) 21:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Tmanthara, thanks for understanding. In direct quotes from sources, we cannot replace the wording. If absolutely necessary, we can put something in square brackets like so: [...]. In this case that wasn't necessary since "IOA" was introduced in the previous sentence.
- Also please keep in mind that every occurrence of a term should not be made into a wikilink, as per WP:OVERLINK policy. Well-known terms such as country names don't need blue links. Also, you need to ensure that you are linking to the current page, e.g., Assam province, not Assam.
- Happy editing! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Help
[edit]Hello in the article,Nirmala College, Muvattupuzha, in the controversy section ,there appears to be an edit war with the user അദ്വൈതൻ. The said user seems to present the article targetting the Muslim community in a bad light.So I had changed the tone without changing the meaning to present it in a more neutral point of view.Also he is not allowing me to complete the story.After the incident have happened,the Muslim community have apologized for the incident.Also State SFI president have clarified they are not involved in the protests.He is not allowing me to put both these sentences in the article.They are credible sources that I have added for the both these sources.Whenever I put this he simply reverts it.The said used അദ്വൈതൻ have repeatedly warned of edit wars in the past and have been blocked.Could you please see the section yourself? If I am at fault you can correct me.I am still new to this and I totally understand it I can make mistakes.Tmanthara (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- The editor is wrong to reinstate their content without discussion. All edits are subject to WP:CONSENSUS. If an edit is reverted, totally or partially, they need to discuss the issues on the talk page and come to an agreement.
- Secondly, the section is too detailed and WP:UNDUE. The page is on a college, and one lone incident can't take up so much space, however controversial it may be. The issue needs to be summarised more succinctly. Please look at WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTNEWS, which describe these common phenomena.
- I suggest you open a discussion on the talk page, and mention these issues. You can also address his edit summaries in his reverts, which are quite off the mark. As you recognize it already, it is a problem editor. You may need to spend a lot of effort in arriving at a resolution. Welcome to the club! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3 You can explain or caste your opinion for this move discussion of Talk:Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty#Requested move 7 August 2024.[2]? 2402:AD80:13A:41ED:1:0:B23B:D3AA (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)