Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8 Ball Pool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. WP:SNOW keep, there appears to be no support for the deletion of the article whatsoever. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8 Ball Pool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly contested WP:BLAR with zero references. A previous RfD resulted in a redirection to Eight-ball. Miniclip video game fails WP:NVG. Jalen Barks (Woof) 20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jalen Barks (Woof) 20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I was able to find several reviews of the game in reliable sources: CNET [1], The Ledger [2], Pocket Gamer [3] and some covered in WP:VG/RS like Gamezebo (Facebook version) [4] and Slide to Play [5]. The game passes WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per Jovanmilic, appears to pass WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per Jovanmilic.Timur9008 (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jovanmilic97, it does pass WP:GNG, it just needs to be properly written, removing sections like currency and surprise boxes, they can have mentions in the gameplay section MK at your service. 14:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Passes WP:GNG Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes WP:GNG - I also found, albeit not as much in quality as Jovanmilic's, several more sources online about 8 Ball Pool. win8x (talking | spying) 21:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Jovanmilic97. The nomination was made in good faith and it's always nice when someone finds sources. This definitely needs some cleaning up. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment I never said the article needed cleanup, and I'm very well aware of WP:NOTCLEANUP. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.