Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Chin (photographer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. czar 16:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alan Chin (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like this photographer has done plenty of work, but doesn't have anything that meets WP:ARTIST or WP:JOURNALIST. The article is essentially unreferenced. Lots of external links to stories/photo-essays that the subject was involved with, many are dead links. The remainder are articles that Chin wrote himself. Seems a little grand and self-promoting. Since there's no real claim to notability and better references aren't forthcoming, I'm nominating for deletion. Mikeblas (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keepKeep The article states: "His work can be found in the collections of the Museum of Modern Art and the Detroit Institute of Art." (my external links added). WP:ARTIST requires that the subject's work has "been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." -Lopifalko (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: meets WP:CREATIVE, with works held in permanent collections of major museums; there's also a prize which seems significant. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets a notability criterion (and only one needs to be met). Incidentally, I'm surprised by the warning flags attached to items in the list of external links; Mikeblas might consider WP:ELMAYBE, item 4. -- Hoary (talk) 04:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm here via the academic deletion sorting list, and he isn't notable as a professor, but he meets WP:ARTIST and a single notability criterion is good enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: meets WP:ARTIST and WP:CREATIVE. --SalmanZ (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Meets WP:CREATIVE. Multiple nominations for the Pulitzer Prize and the works in museums are clinchers. -- Otr500 (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.