Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with www.ncleg.gov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disclaimer of NCGA said "Photos of House and Senate Members on the individual NCGA Website member webpages are not published on the NCGA Website until we receive copyright release from the photographer so these specific photos are considered in the public domain once they are published on the NCGA Website." Although NCGA may not hold the copyright. but the photographer do. These photos cannot be considered to be in public domain per COM:PCP.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC) :* A1Cafel, Marilyn Stark.jpg is Oklahoma not North Carolina. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:24, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Mistaken photo. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, or at least try to seek clarification. This seems overly pedantic. I understand the disclaimer to refer to any photos that differ from the uniform grey-background headshots that appear on this page (example). The grey-background headshots appear to be works of the NCGA. I am not sure what you are to argue as the disclaimer is very explicit with regard to copyright releases being secured before uploading to the NCGA website from the original rights holders in these very few cases. Furthermore, all the above listed photos are official NCGA headshots. Connormah (talk | contribs) 03:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems to be an overly cautious approach. Reading the disclaimer the photographers should be considered employees for a US government  Keep --Zenwort (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The disclaimer states that the items are in the public domain once posted on the appropriate website. As a result, I think we can have confidence that these are correctly referred to as being in the public domain. Mhawk10 (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Consensus that this is an undue amount of caution. --King of ♥ 02:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]