Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yprpyqp

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work as claimed and missing source.

— Racconish ^💬 22:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) 2

Sourcing inadequate: no precise information provided on the book reference or web URL from which the image was taken/scanned (cf. template parameters on what is required for "source"; instead images claimed as own work

Gun Powder Ma (talk) 17:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Background information here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, previous DR above. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep keep the files but fix the descriptions. Bad metadata for clearly PD files is not among list of reasons for deletion. I can help with batch fixes once correct source data is provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarekt (talk • contribs) 19:23, 12 January 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fixing the description is much less work than undeleting. Most of these files are in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

since some Good Samaritans have offered to help, i will go thru the files too, but i dont have time before the end of Feb. Sysops please defer a decision until April.--Roy17 (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if the picture is used on a page there it is not nice to delete to delete them. Unused pictures could be deleted. I hope someone will come up with a source sometime. Taksen (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been now one month and nothing has been done so far. Roy17 cannot be serious if he wants the project to keep copyright-violating images for three more months time up until he might have time for it. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This DR was not made in good faith. It's a waste of time. No merit for any volunteer to go thru the files because of one sabotager.

Keep all. DR individual files only if there is evidence they are copyvio.--Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the user has this many copyright issues then they can't be trusted. Going through each individual image would take forever, and if the commons people can't be bothered then they should be presumptively deleted Wizardman 02:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Most have a source given in the description, the rest of those I looked at were in a similar style and can probably be supposed to be old as well. It is easy to change the source and author fields. I suppose the user can be trusted about the description – and we don't need an ISBN to keep PD images. –LPfi (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: very differnet cases. Please nominate in separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) (background maps)

Permission needed for background map

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and first section above. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and other sections of this DR. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photos uploaded by Yprpyqp

Dubious own-work claim. User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp). No indication of where or when these photos was taken, which would maybe lend some credence to the own-work claim. The swords one lacks metadata, the Horsemen have one type of camera, and the one titled "長方盾" has a different camera entirely, which just feels sketchy to me.

Premeditated Chaos (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and first section above. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 09:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yprpyqp

Contents

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) 2

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) (background maps)

Photos uploaded by Yprpyqp

Navigation menu

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yprpyqp

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) 2

Files uploaded by Yprpyqp (talk · contribs) (background maps)

Photos uploaded by Yprpyqp

Navigation menu

Search