User talk:Londonjackbooks

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons upload file info template PD-old

[edit]
{{Information
|Description={{en|1=Portrait of Abram J. Ryan.}}
|Source=Scanned from  ''The Magazine of Poetry: A Quarterly Review.'' Oct. 1892: 380. Print. Vol. IV No. 4. Published by Charles Wells Moulton: Buffalo, New York.
|Author=unknown
|Date=
|Permission=None/copyright expired
|other_versions=
}}

[[Category:Poets from the United States]]

== Licensing ==
{{PD-old}}

✓ Done Check on deletion request:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yellow-billed_Cuckoo.jpg

License omissions

[edit]

Sorry! These were victims of copy/paste haste! I'll check my other recent uploads as well... Londonjackbooks (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


✓ Done

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File talk:Fifes and Drums, Poems of America at War, Vigilantes, 1917.djvu

[edit]

note: File talk:Fifes and Drums, Poems of America at War, Vigilantes, 1917.djvu Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I had the same problem uploading the PDF version. I downloaded the PDF version via Archives.org, saved it to my computer, then uploaded the PDF file from my computer to Commons... Either something gets lost in the translation, or I am doing something wrong!? Sorry to be a bother! Londonjackbooks (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I am here to help. ;)
You are not doing anything wrong.. It also has no text if I open it with okular. It has text if I open it with adobe acrobat. I guess there is some not very usual compression algorithm used for the text which is not understood by okular, your pdf→djvu program and by mediawiki's pdf viewer.
I have downloaded the djvu file (on the source page click on HTTP and then on djvu) and reuploaded it. You can speedy the pdf version then. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Herbert_Asquith_poet_signature_1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Pathway of Roses, Larson (1913)

[edit]

Scanning a book as a series of individual page JPEGs is allowed, but where the book is mainly textual, the PDF or Djvu formats are often preferred. Also, to be more correct with current emerging best practices, the licensing tag should probably be {{PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=XXXX}}, where "XXXX" is the year of the author's death... AnonMoos (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am transcribing the book to Wikisource, and am doing it in stages. I could photograph all the pages first, convert to PDF, then upload (via Archive.org or otherwise), but I am not patient enough, and wanted to get started transcribing. Were there a similar (London, 1913) edition available at Archive.org, I would have opted for that route. With regard to the licensing tag, is there a bot that can take care of the pages I have already uploaded? I don't mind doing it by hand otherwise. Thanks, Londonjackbooks (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There probably is a bot, but I don't know anything about it... AnonMoos (talk) 23:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks, Londonjackbooks (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna opt to make the changes myself, but for future reference (if needed), see Commons:Bots/Work requests. Thanks again, Londonjackbooks (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Londonjackbooks (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:TheRomanceOfNature 0067color.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TheRomanceOfNature 0067color.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 09:52, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now; let me know if I've missed something. Thanks for the heads-up, Londonjackbooks (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Thanks a lot! LX (talk, contribs) 23:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixed

[edit]

Sonja, why did you place the following on my talk page?

"Fixed. Londonjackbooks (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)"

Why interfere with my image work in any manner? I am the one who placed the colored flower image on Commons and replaced the one in greyscale after cleaning the colored flower &c, -- not you. I could have and would have placed the needed material on commons as asked. I don't need you to step in before I even get to reply. I also know about the Category and would have corrected that. William Maury Morris II (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I stepped on your toes. My bad. No harm meant; on the contrary... Londonjackbooks (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, you did nothing wrong here at all. The uploader should provide a verifiable source during upload, but if they don't, anyone who is able to is free to correct the problem. There is no ownership of files on Commons. It's a collaborative project, and the sooner problems are fixed, regardless of who does it, the better. I would have fixed it myself instead of tagging the file if I'd been able to identify the source. So, thanks again. LX (talk, contribs) 19:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am familiar with Mr. Morris, and in hindsight, I perhaps should have given a courtesy heads-up first. Your comments are appreciated, however. Thanks, Londonjackbooks (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I think this is probably the best of the three images of Coates; I'd like to clean it up a bit, to try to get it to featured picture status, but is there any chance of begging a higher resolution scan first? Cheers, Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the highest resolution I have. I gave away the text which contains the image as a gift a few years ago. Thanks for considering the photo! Londonjackbooks (talk) 13:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Florence Earle Coates. This should, hopefully, get her onto the main page. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that :) Londonjackbooks (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you find anything else that might be worth restoring, please tell me. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Thanks again! Londonjackbooks (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fifes and Drums, Poems of America at War, Vigilantes, 1917.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peter Unmut (talk) 23:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soldier poets, songs of the fighting men, 1916.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Soldier poets, songs of the fighting men, 1916.djvu has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Xover (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soldier poets, songs of the fighting men, 1916.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]