Aaron Liu

This user page has been copied once.

Here's my bio, totally not taken straight from somewhere else ;)

I like programming, computer science, internet surfing, and superuser impostoring. I've been described as a "wonderful bastard".

I also like clearing maintenance queues, feel free to ping me if you need help!

I also write some userscripts, including /Watchlyst Greybar Unsin, /MoveTop and m:User:Aaron Liu/What redirects here.js.
As a Vector 2022 fanatic, I've created my own enhancements of it at m:User:Aaron Liu/v22.css based on User:Jonesey95/common.css.
I license all of these under the GNU Affero General Public License v3 or later.

You may know me from WP:RBV22 and WP:S++. I realize that I've been monkeying around meta stuff a bit too much, but I'll try to do content stuff in my giant checklist below.

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Testimonials

I know you love fights but I have don’t.
— User:Fishytimes196 21:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

OMG, you actually tried to redefine it!!! [1] (I just reverted that nonsense). The level of disruption here is out of control.
— User:Born2cycle 06:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Why the hell are you even commenting on our politics you commie? Go focus on your own dictatorial government you pos.
— User:24.172.154.107 19:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Glossary

Nosist: A person who refers to themself using the first-person plural, a.k.a. using the we/our pronouns. Employed by some pluralists. I did this for a while before I was banned from a Discord server I love and sometimes still do it. I am not a pluralist.
Ip, Ippy, Ippo: A way to humanize IP editors. The latter two are employed when there are multiple IP editors.
nomm'd: A telltale sign that one is a Wifione sockpuppet, despite the entire word being orthographically and grammatically correct. The people who say "nom'd" are the true freaks.

Hate speech

This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Userboxes

Now, how do I do this userbox thingy?

~~big words~~

This user opposes the use of ~~esoteric, abstruse and recondite~~ ^big words in Wikipedia articles when simple ones will do.

Copyeditor

Formatter

Sourcer

Veteran Editor

This user is a recent changes patroller.

This user wants to tax the rich to provide health care, education and welfare for everyone._†

$ £
¥ €

This user contributes using Safari on an iPad.