Category talk:21st-century regents

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Years This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Biography: Politics and Government This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This category is supported by the politics and government work group.

This category was nominated for renaming on 18 June 2023. The result of the discussion was rename to "viceroys".

This category was nominated on 24 May for renaming from viceregal rulers to "viceroys". That was relisted and approved at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_18#Category:21st-century_viceregal_rulers.

Preceding centuries were then renamed to "regents" at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_11#Viceregal_rulers.

@Nederlandse Leeuw and Marcocapelle: I have added links between them, but would it be better for this to use "regents" like the others? – Fayenatic London 11:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @Fayenatic london: yes I suspect that the content of the 21st-century category is meanwhile quite different from when it was originally nominated. It only contains a regent now. I also wonder if the article shouldn't be purged, having been a regent for a few days is not particularly defining. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Heh, well, that was a pretty pointless renaming then. I think it's best to just merge this to Category:Regents (as we are in the process of upmerging all 21st-century "rulers"). I'm not convinced by Marco that being a regent for a few days is nondefining; after all, we've got Umberto II of Italy ("reigned" for 34 days), Dipendra of Nepal ("reigned" for 4 days while in a coma after shooting himself in the head) and of course Khalid bin Barghash of Zanzibar, who was factually "reigning" as a sultan for just 38/45 minutes, but we do categorise even him as a sultan and a monarch. Even so, this may still be deleted/merged as a smallcat. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]