Talk:1930 Kansas gubernatorial election
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BorgQueen talk 08:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- ... that a quack doctor best known for transplanting goat testicles into men almost won the 1930 and 1932 Kansas gubernatorial elections?
- Source: 1930 Kansas gubernatorial election page states, "After losing his medical and broadcast licenses, "goat-gland doctor" John R. Brinkley decided to run for governor, a position that would enable him to appoint his own members to the medical board and thus regain his right to practice medicine." And, "Because Brinkley announced his campaign so late, he had to run as a write-in candidate. Three days before the election, the Attorney General of Kansas (a known opponent) announced that the rules surrounding write-in candidates had changed, and that Brinkley's name could only be written in in one specific way for the vote to count (as "J. R. Brinkley"). An article published at the time in The Des Moines Register estimated that between 30,000 and 50,000 ballots were disqualified in this manner. The successful candidate, Woodring, later admitted he would have lost had all of Brinkley's votes been counted."
- Reviewed:
Created by Ziggypower (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Ziggypower (talk) 20:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC).
Hello @Ziggypower: and thank you for your interest in DYK. Per WP:DYKNEW, articles featured at DYK must have been created within the last seven days, expanded 5x by character count, promoted as a good article, moved from userspace or draftspace into mainspace, or translated from another Wikipedia. None of these apply and so therefore this is not eligible. Feel free to nominate any articles that are.--Launchballer 00:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)