Talk:1993 FA Charity Shield/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 20:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Lemonade51 (talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with other FAs & FLs: 1956 FA Cup Final, 1923 FA Cup Final, Arsenal F.C. league record by opponent & Premier League Manager of the Season
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Cross-checked with other FAs & FLs: 1956 FA Cup Final, 1923 FA Cup Final, Arsenal F.C. league record by opponent & Premier League Manager of the Season
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:
The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give relative emphasis.
- Thanks for your thorough and detailed review. Have expanded the lead to include some pre and post-match detail, as well as more about the match itself. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 08:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
- Thanks for your thorough and detailed review. Have expanded the lead to include some pre and post-match detail, as well as more about the match itself. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 09:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 08:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)