Jump to content

Talk:AppleToo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Withdrawn did you know nomination

[edit]
I created {{Did you know nominations/AppleToo}} because the template wasn't created. I boldly tweaked some grammar (Apple Inc and skipped day of month), feel free to readjust as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Converted from a redirect by 74.89.25.100 (talk).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The article does not seem neutral, considering the biased words rarely use quotations, the article also does not seem plagiarism free, with 10 percent of plagiarism, Good enough for DYK. TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheNuggeteer a comprehensive DYK review would give more specific feedback. Which words are biased or WP:WEASEL? Can you give examples so that the nominator can make the relevant improvements? And regarding copyright violation, a percentage doesn't say much. Checking earwig, I checked several examples and determined them to be false matches, or appropriately used, e.g an attributed quote. If you have specific copyright violations in mind, please explicitly mention which ones. The tooling and percentages are meant to guide the search but are not a substitute for in-depth analysis. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shushugah According to WP:CONTENTIOUS "racist" and "sexist" (and probably others: racial discrimination, ableism, assault) are words to watch, considering they are not confirmed (regarding the ongoing 2024 lawsuit). I recommend (also according to WP:ALLEGED) to add alleged and to put quotes beside the alleged words. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, regarding the copyright, I've changed the checklist from blank to yes. Considering the mistake. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TheNuggeteer, can you check the changes? Thank you 2603:7080:AF03:34A4:3487:F0AC:7F1D:1643 (talk) 19:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added alleged to spots where it was missing and reworded lawsuit to also use alleged. 24.169.15.170 (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

helpful sources!

[edit]

Carrigan, Coleen (2023). Cracking the bro code. Labor and technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54705-5.

Pontefract, Dan (October 24, 2023). Work-Life Bloom: How to Nurture a Team that Flourishes. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Figure 1 Publishing. ISBN 9781773272221.

Broussard, Meredith (2023). More than a glitch: confronting race, gender, and ability bias in tech. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-04765-4.

Navas, Eduardo (2023). The rise of metacreativity: AI aesthetics after remix. New York, New York ; London, England: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-000-78548-7.

Alder, Matt; Dinnen, Mervyn (2022). Digital talent: find, recruit and retain the people your business needs in a world of digital transformation. London, England; New York, New York: KoganPage. ISBN 978-0-7494-9165-9.

Aguerrebere, Pablo Medina (May 25, 2023). Diabolical Capitalism: How Companies Destroy People’s Lives. Spain: Caligrama. ISBN 9788419808134. 174.231.117.112 (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]